LIQUID NITROGEN SPRAY CRYOTHERAPY FOR ERADICATION OF DYSPLASTIC BARRETT'S ESOPHAGUS: RESULTS FROM A MULTICENTER PROSPECTIVE REGISTRY.

Barrett’s esophagus cryotherapy endoscopic eradication esophageal adenocarcinoma

Journal

Gastrointestinal endoscopy
ISSN: 1097-6779
Titre abrégé: Gastrointest Endosc
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0010505

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 25 08 2023
revised: 24 12 2023
accepted: 10 01 2024
medline: 26 1 2024
pubmed: 26 1 2024
entrez: 25 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Liquid nitrogen spray cryotherapy (SCT) is an alternative to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for eradication of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (BE). We aimed to assess the safety, efficacy, and durability of SCT in a multicenter U.S. registry. This is a multicenter prospective registry of adults with BE treated with truFreeze Spray Cryotherapy (4 community and 11 academic sites, 2013-2022). Complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CEIM) and dysplasia (CED) were assessed in BE with dysplasia or intramucosal adenocarcinoma (IMC). Kaplan-Meier analysis of CEIM and CED was performed. Hazard ratios for CEIM stratified by baseline risk factors were calculated. Among 138 subjects, with LGD (24%), HGD (49%) and IMC (27%), 34% received prior RFA therapy. Subjects received a median of 2 SCT sessions. Adverse events were uncommon, with 5.5% reporting strictures and 0.7% a perforation. Rates of CEIM and CED, respectively, were 66% and 84% after two years, and 67% and 92% after three years. In RFA-naive patients, CEIM was 77% and CED was 96% at 3 years. Increasing BE length (adjusted hazard ratio [95% CI]:0.90 [0.83-0.96] per cm) and prior treatment with RFA (0.39 [0.22-0.69]) were associated with a lower rate of CEIM. Recurrence occurred in 8.8% (n=6) at a mean follow-up of 2.5 years after CEIM. In this largest reported prospective cohort, liquid nitrogen SCT was safe and effective for treatment of dysplastic and neoplastic BE. Response was lower in those with prior failed RFA; in that cohort approximately 50% attained CEIM at 3 years.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND AIMS OBJECTIVE
Liquid nitrogen spray cryotherapy (SCT) is an alternative to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for eradication of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (BE). We aimed to assess the safety, efficacy, and durability of SCT in a multicenter U.S. registry.
METHODS METHODS
This is a multicenter prospective registry of adults with BE treated with truFreeze Spray Cryotherapy (4 community and 11 academic sites, 2013-2022). Complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CEIM) and dysplasia (CED) were assessed in BE with dysplasia or intramucosal adenocarcinoma (IMC). Kaplan-Meier analysis of CEIM and CED was performed. Hazard ratios for CEIM stratified by baseline risk factors were calculated.
RESULTS RESULTS
Among 138 subjects, with LGD (24%), HGD (49%) and IMC (27%), 34% received prior RFA therapy. Subjects received a median of 2 SCT sessions. Adverse events were uncommon, with 5.5% reporting strictures and 0.7% a perforation. Rates of CEIM and CED, respectively, were 66% and 84% after two years, and 67% and 92% after three years. In RFA-naive patients, CEIM was 77% and CED was 96% at 3 years. Increasing BE length (adjusted hazard ratio [95% CI]:0.90 [0.83-0.96] per cm) and prior treatment with RFA (0.39 [0.22-0.69]) were associated with a lower rate of CEIM. Recurrence occurred in 8.8% (n=6) at a mean follow-up of 2.5 years after CEIM.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
In this largest reported prospective cohort, liquid nitrogen SCT was safe and effective for treatment of dysplastic and neoplastic BE. Response was lower in those with prior failed RFA; in that cohort approximately 50% attained CEIM at 3 years.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38272279
pii: S0016-5107(24)00042-7
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.01.023
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Swathi Eluri (S)

Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, and; Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC;. Electronic address: swathi@med.unc.edu.

Cary C Cotton (CC)

Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, and; Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.

Vivek Kaul (V)

University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.

Matthew McKinley (M)

Hofstra North Shore - LIJ School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY.

Douglas Pleskow (D)

Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.

Norman Nishioka (N)

Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

Brenda Hoffman (B)

Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.

Jose Nieto (J)

Borland Groover Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.

Franklin Tsai (F)

Scripps Health, La Jolla, CA.

Walter Coyle (W)

Scripps Health, La Jolla, CA.

Shivangi Kothari (S)

University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.

Virendra Joshi (V)

Louisana State University Medical Center, Baton Rouge, LA.

John Dumot (J)

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH.

Bruce Greenwald (B)

University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

Fadlallah G Habr (FG)

Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI.

Nicholas J Shaheen (NJ)

Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, and; Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.

Classifications MeSH