Influence of pathogenic filaggrin variants on dupilumab treatment in atopic dermatitis.

atopic dermatitis biologics dupilumab filaggrin patient-reported outcomes

Journal

The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology
ISSN: 1097-6825
Titre abrégé: J Allergy Clin Immunol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 1275002

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 21 07 2023
revised: 22 10 2023
accepted: 01 12 2023
medline: 26 1 2024
pubmed: 26 1 2024
entrez: 25 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Pathogenic variants in filaggrin (FLG) are associated with an increased risk of atopic dermatitis (AD). To evaluate the influence of FLG variants on the effectiveness of dupilumab treatment in AD. This prospective observational study included adult AD patients treated with dupilumab from the BioDay Registry. FLG was analysed with smMIP targeted sequencing. Novel mutations were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Investigator Global Assessment (IGA), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pruritus, Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DLQI) and Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) were assessed at baseline, week 16 and 52. Genetic analysis of 285 included patients showed bi-allelic pathogenic variants (FLG-/-) in n=41 (14%), mono-allelic pathogenic variants (FLG-/+) in n=64 (23%) and wild-type alleles (FLG+/+) in n=180 (63%). Three novel pathogenic variants were found. We observed no clinically relevant differences in EASI, IGA, NRS pruritus, DLQI and total POEM scores for patients with and without pathogenic FLG variants at all time points. The FLG-/- group showed significantly higher POEM flaking and dryness scores at week 16 (p<0.001 and p=0.002, respectively) and 52 (p<0.001 and p=0.016, respectively) compared to FLG+/+, and also significant differences compared with FLG-/+, while differences in delta scores were non-significant. This study suggests that the effectiveness of dupilumab treatment in AD patients was not influenced by pathogenic FLG variants. However, patients with bi-allelic pathogenic FLG variants tended to have a drier skin before and during dupilumab treatment compared to patients with mono-allelic pathogenic variants or wild-type alleles.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Pathogenic variants in filaggrin (FLG) are associated with an increased risk of atopic dermatitis (AD).
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the influence of FLG variants on the effectiveness of dupilumab treatment in AD.
METHODS METHODS
This prospective observational study included adult AD patients treated with dupilumab from the BioDay Registry. FLG was analysed with smMIP targeted sequencing. Novel mutations were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Investigator Global Assessment (IGA), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pruritus, Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DLQI) and Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) were assessed at baseline, week 16 and 52.
RESULTS RESULTS
Genetic analysis of 285 included patients showed bi-allelic pathogenic variants (FLG-/-) in n=41 (14%), mono-allelic pathogenic variants (FLG-/+) in n=64 (23%) and wild-type alleles (FLG+/+) in n=180 (63%). Three novel pathogenic variants were found. We observed no clinically relevant differences in EASI, IGA, NRS pruritus, DLQI and total POEM scores for patients with and without pathogenic FLG variants at all time points. The FLG-/- group showed significantly higher POEM flaking and dryness scores at week 16 (p<0.001 and p=0.002, respectively) and 52 (p<0.001 and p=0.016, respectively) compared to FLG+/+, and also significant differences compared with FLG-/+, while differences in delta scores were non-significant.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
This study suggests that the effectiveness of dupilumab treatment in AD patients was not influenced by pathogenic FLG variants. However, patients with bi-allelic pathogenic FLG variants tended to have a drier skin before and during dupilumab treatment compared to patients with mono-allelic pathogenic variants or wild-type alleles.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38272373
pii: S0091-6749(24)00075-7
doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.12.027
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Julia Clabbers (J)

Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Dermatology, Haga Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.

Celeste Boesjes (C)

Department of Dermatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Lotte Spekhorst (L)

Department of Dermatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Marike W van Gisbergen (MW)

Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Emmy Maas (E)

Department of Dermatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Josephine Marshall (J)

Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Renske Janssen (R)

Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Miranda Janssen (M)

Department of Methodology and Statistics, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Nicolaas P A Zuithoff (NPA)

Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Peter Steijlen (P)

Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Marlies de Graaf (M)

Department of Dermatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Michel van Geel (M)

Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Marjolein de Bruin-Weller (M)

Department of Dermatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Antoni Gostyński (A)

Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: antoni.gostynski@mumc.nl.

Classifications MeSH