COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign.

autoimmune cardiovascular covid-19 mrna vaccines gene therapy products immunity mortality registrational trials risk-benefit assessment sars-cov-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus -2) serious adverse events

Journal

Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2024
Historique:
accepted: 24 01 2024
medline: 26 1 2024
pubmed: 26 1 2024
entrez: 26 1 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Our understanding of COVID-19 vaccinations and their impact on health and mortality has evolved substantially since the first vaccine rollouts. Published reports from the original randomized phase 3 trials concluded that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines could greatly reduce COVID-19 symptoms. In the interim, problems with the methods, execution, and reporting of these pivotal trials have emerged. Re-analysis of the Pfizer trial data identified statistically significant increases in serious adverse events (SAEs) in the vaccine group. Numerous SAEs were identified following the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), including death, cancer, cardiac events, and various autoimmune, hematological, reproductive, and neurological disorders. Furthermore, these products never underwent adequate safety and toxicological testing in accordance with previously established scientific standards. Among the other major topics addressed in this narrative review are the published analyses of serious harms to humans, quality control issues and process-related impurities, mechanisms underlying adverse events (AEs), the immunologic basis for vaccine inefficacy, and concerning mortality trends based on the registrational trial data. The risk-benefit imbalance substantiated by the evidence to date contraindicates further booster injections and suggests that, at a minimum, the mRNA injections should be removed from the childhood immunization program until proper safety and toxicological studies are conducted. Federal agency approval of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines on a blanket-coverage population-wide basis had no support from an honest assessment of all relevant registrational data and commensurate consideration of risks versus benefits. Given the extensive, well-documented SAEs and unacceptably high harm-to-reward ratio, we urge governments to endorse a global moratorium on the modified mRNA products until all relevant questions pertaining to causality, residual DNA, and aberrant protein production are answered.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38274635
doi: 10.7759/cureus.52876
pmc: PMC10810638
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

e52876

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024, Mead et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Steve Kirsch is the founder of the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation or VSRF (vacsafety.org) but receives no income from this entity

Auteurs

M Nathaniel Mead (MN)

Biology and Nutritional Epidemiology, Independent Research, Copper Hill, USA.

Stephanie Seneff (S)

Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA.

Russ Wolfinger (R)

Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Independent Research, Research Triangle Park, USA.

Jessica Rose (J)

Immunology and Public Health Research, Independent Research, Ottawa, CAN.

Kris Denhaerynck (K)

Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Independent Research, Basel, CHE.

Steve Kirsch (S)

Data Science, Independent Research, Los Angeles, USA.

Peter A McCullough (PA)

Cardiology, Epidemiology, and Public Health, McCullough Foundation, Dallas, USA.
Cardiology, Epidemiology, and Public Health, Truth for Health Foundation, Tucson, USA.

Classifications MeSH