Characterizing the bacterial communities associated with Mediterranean sponges: a metataxonomic analysis.
bacteria
metataxonomic analysis
molecular identification
morphological identification
sponges
Journal
Frontiers in microbiology
ISSN: 1664-302X
Titre abrégé: Front Microbiol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101548977
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
02
10
2023
accepted:
20
12
2023
medline:
26
1
2024
pubmed:
26
1
2024
entrez:
26
1
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The oceans cover over 70% of our planet, hosting a biodiversity of tremendous wealth. Sponges are one of the major ecosystem engineers on the seafloor, providing a habitat for a wide variety of species to be considered a good source of bioactive compounds. In this study, a metataxonomic approach was employed to describe the bacterial communities of the sponges collected from Faro Lake (Sicily) and Porto Paone (Gulf of Naples). Morphological analysis and amplification of the conserved molecular markers, including 18S and 28S (RNA ribosomal genes), CO1 (mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit 1), and ITS (internal transcribed spacer), allowed the identification of four sponges. Metataxonomic analysis of sponges revealed a large number of amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) belonging to the phyla Proteobacteria, Cloroflexi, Dadabacteria, and Poribacteria. In particular,
Identifiants
pubmed: 38274771
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1295459
pmc: PMC10808595
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1295459Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Esposito, Federico, Sonnessa, Reddel, Bertolino, Ruocco, Zagami, Giovine, Pozzolini, Guida, Zupo and Costantini.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
MS and SR were employed by Bio-Fab Research Srl. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.