Weaning from Kidney Replacement Therapy in the Critically Ill Patient with Acute Kidney Injury.

KRT weaning acute kidney injury creatinine clearance critical care kidney replacement therapy (KRT) urinary biomarkers urinary creatinine urinary urea urine output

Journal

Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 21 12 2023
revised: 12 01 2024
accepted: 16 01 2024
medline: 26 1 2024
pubmed: 26 1 2024
entrez: 26 1 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Around 10% of critically ill patients suffer acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring kidney replacement therapy (KRT), with a mortality rate approaching 50%. Although most survivors achieve sufficient renal recovery to be weaned from KRT, there are no recognized guidelines on the optimal period for weaning from KRT. A systematic review was conducted using a peer-reviewed strategy, combining themes of KRT (intermittent hemodialysis, CKRT: continuous veno-venous hemo/dialysis/filtration/diafiltration, sustained low-efficiency dialysis/filtration), factors predictive of successful weaning (defined as a prolonged period without new KRT) and patient outcomes. Our research resulted in studies, all observational, describing clinical and biological parameters predictive of successful weaning from KRT. Urine output prior to KRT cessation is the most studied variable and the most widely used in practice. Other predictive factors, such as urinary urea and creatinine and new urinary and serum renal biomarkers, including cystatin C and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), were also analyzed in the light of recent studies. This review presents the rationale for early weaning from KRT, the parameters that can guide it, and its practical modalities. Once the patient's clinical condition has stabilized and volume status optimized, a diuresis greater than 500 mL/day should prompt the intensivist to consider weaning. Urinary parameters could be useful in predicting weaning success but have yet to be validated.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38276085
pii: jcm13020579
doi: 10.3390/jcm13020579
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Auteurs

Kada Klouche (K)

Intensive Care Unit Département, Lapeyronie University Hospital Montpellier, 34295 Montpellier, France.
Phymedexp, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montpellier, Inserm, Centre National de Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), CHRU de Montpellier, 34295 Montpellier, France.

Vincent Brunot (V)

Intensive Care Unit Département, Lapeyronie University Hospital Montpellier, 34295 Montpellier, France.

Romaric Larcher (R)

Intensive Care Unit Département, Lapeyronie University Hospital Montpellier, 34295 Montpellier, France.
Phymedexp, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montpellier, Inserm, Centre National de Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), CHRU de Montpellier, 34295 Montpellier, France.

Alexandre Lautrette (A)

Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Jean PERRIN, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Classifications MeSH