Development and Implementation of Digital Diagnostic Algorithms for Neonatal Units in Zimbabwe and Malawi: Development and Usability Study.

Malawi, Zimbabwe clinical decision support digital health mHealth mobile apps mobile health neonatology newborn usability

Journal

JMIR formative research
ISSN: 2561-326X
Titre abrégé: JMIR Form Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101726394

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 06 11 2023
accepted: 20 12 2023
revised: 19 12 2023
medline: 26 1 2024
pubmed: 26 1 2024
entrez: 26 1 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Despite an increase in hospital-based deliveries, neonatal mortality remains high in low-resource settings. Due to limited laboratory diagnostics, there is significant reliance on clinical findings to inform diagnoses. Accurate, evidence-based identification and management of neonatal conditions could improve outcomes by standardizing care. This could be achieved through digital clinical decision support (CDS) tools. Neotree is a digital, quality improvement platform that incorporates CDS, aiming to improve neonatal care in low-resource health care facilities. Before this study, first-phase CDS development included developing and implementing neonatal resuscitation algorithms, creating initial versions of CDS to address a range of neonatal conditions, and a Delphi study to review key algorithms. This second-phase study aims to codevelop and implement neonatal digital CDS algorithms in Malawi and Zimbabwe. Overall, 11 diagnosis-specific web-based workshops with Zimbabwean, Malawian, and UK neonatal experts were conducted (August 2021 to April 2022) encompassing the following: (1) review of available evidence, (2) review of country-specific guidelines (Essential Medicines List and Standard Treatment Guidelinesfor Zimbabwe and Care of the Infant and Newborn, Malawi), and (3) identification of uncertainties within the literature for future studies. After agreement of clinical content, the algorithms were programmed into a test script, tested with the respective hospital's health care professionals (HCPs), and refined according to their feedback. Once finalized, the algorithms were programmed into the Neotree software and implemented at the tertiary-level implementation sites: Sally Mugabe Central Hospital in Zimbabwe and Kamuzu Central Hospital in Malawi, in December 2021 and May 2022, respectively. In Zimbabwe, usability was evaluated through 2 usability workshops and usability questionnaires: Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ) and System Usability Scale (SUS). Overall, 11 evidence-based diagnostic and management algorithms were tailored to local resource availability. These refined algorithms were then integrated into Neotree. Where national management guidelines differed, country-specific guidelines were created. In total, 9 HCPs attended the usability workshops and completed the SUS, among whom 8 (89%) completed the PSSUQ. Both usability scores (SUS mean score 75.8 out of 100 [higher score is better]; PSSUQ overall score 2.28 out of 7 [lower score is better]) demonstrated high usability of the CDS function but highlighted issues around technical complexity, which continue to be addressed iteratively. This study describes the successful development and implementation of the only known neonatal CDS system, incorporated within a bedside data capture system with the ability to deliver up-to-date management guidelines, tailored to local resource availability. This study highlighted the importance of collaborative participatory design. Further implementation evaluation is planned to guide and inform the development of health system and program strategies to support newborn HCPs, with the ultimate goal of reducing preventable neonatal morbidity and mortality in low-resource settings.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Despite an increase in hospital-based deliveries, neonatal mortality remains high in low-resource settings. Due to limited laboratory diagnostics, there is significant reliance on clinical findings to inform diagnoses. Accurate, evidence-based identification and management of neonatal conditions could improve outcomes by standardizing care. This could be achieved through digital clinical decision support (CDS) tools. Neotree is a digital, quality improvement platform that incorporates CDS, aiming to improve neonatal care in low-resource health care facilities. Before this study, first-phase CDS development included developing and implementing neonatal resuscitation algorithms, creating initial versions of CDS to address a range of neonatal conditions, and a Delphi study to review key algorithms.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This second-phase study aims to codevelop and implement neonatal digital CDS algorithms in Malawi and Zimbabwe.
METHODS METHODS
Overall, 11 diagnosis-specific web-based workshops with Zimbabwean, Malawian, and UK neonatal experts were conducted (August 2021 to April 2022) encompassing the following: (1) review of available evidence, (2) review of country-specific guidelines (Essential Medicines List and Standard Treatment Guidelinesfor Zimbabwe and Care of the Infant and Newborn, Malawi), and (3) identification of uncertainties within the literature for future studies. After agreement of clinical content, the algorithms were programmed into a test script, tested with the respective hospital's health care professionals (HCPs), and refined according to their feedback. Once finalized, the algorithms were programmed into the Neotree software and implemented at the tertiary-level implementation sites: Sally Mugabe Central Hospital in Zimbabwe and Kamuzu Central Hospital in Malawi, in December 2021 and May 2022, respectively. In Zimbabwe, usability was evaluated through 2 usability workshops and usability questionnaires: Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ) and System Usability Scale (SUS).
RESULTS RESULTS
Overall, 11 evidence-based diagnostic and management algorithms were tailored to local resource availability. These refined algorithms were then integrated into Neotree. Where national management guidelines differed, country-specific guidelines were created. In total, 9 HCPs attended the usability workshops and completed the SUS, among whom 8 (89%) completed the PSSUQ. Both usability scores (SUS mean score 75.8 out of 100 [higher score is better]; PSSUQ overall score 2.28 out of 7 [lower score is better]) demonstrated high usability of the CDS function but highlighted issues around technical complexity, which continue to be addressed iteratively.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
This study describes the successful development and implementation of the only known neonatal CDS system, incorporated within a bedside data capture system with the ability to deliver up-to-date management guidelines, tailored to local resource availability. This study highlighted the importance of collaborative participatory design. Further implementation evaluation is planned to guide and inform the development of health system and program strategies to support newborn HCPs, with the ultimate goal of reducing preventable neonatal morbidity and mortality in low-resource settings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38277198
pii: v8i1e54274
doi: 10.2196/54274
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e54274

Informations de copyright

©Hannah Gannon, Leyla Larsson, Simbarashe Chimhuya, Marcia Mangiza, Emma Wilson, Erin Kesler, Gwendoline Chimhini, Felicity Fitzgerald, Gloria Zailani, Caroline Crehan, Nushrat Khan, Tim Hull-Bailey, Yali Sassoon, Morris Baradza, Michelle Heys, Msandeni Chiume. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 26.01.2024.

Auteurs

Hannah Gannon (H)

Population, Policy and Practice, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Biomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Leyla Larsson (L)

Institute of Computational Biology, Computational Health Centre, Helmholtz, Munich, Germany.

Simbarashe Chimhuya (S)

Department of Child, Adolescent and Women's Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Marcia Mangiza (M)

Sally Mugabe Central Hospital, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Emma Wilson (E)

Population, Policy and Practice, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Erin Kesler (E)

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philidephia, PA, United States.

Gwendoline Chimhini (G)

Department of Child, Adolescent and Women's Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Felicity Fitzgerald (F)

Biomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Gloria Zailani (G)

Kamuzu Central Hospital, Lilongwe, Malawi.

Caroline Crehan (C)

Population, Policy and Practice, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Nushrat Khan (N)

Population, Policy and Practice, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Tim Hull-Bailey (T)

Population, Policy and Practice, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Yali Sassoon (Y)

Snowplow Analytics, London, United Kingdom.

Morris Baradza (M)

Baobab Web Services, City of Cape Town, South Africa.

Michelle Heys (M)

Population, Policy and Practice, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Msandeni Chiume (M)

Kamuzu Central Hospital, Lilongwe, Malawi.

Classifications MeSH