Predictors of azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil response in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: A cohort study.

Azathioprine Cohort Mycophenolate mofetil Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder Predictor Treatment response

Journal

Multiple sclerosis and related disorders
ISSN: 2211-0356
Titre abrégé: Mult Scler Relat Disord
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101580247

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 25 10 2023
revised: 12 12 2023
accepted: 16 01 2024
medline: 27 1 2024
pubmed: 27 1 2024
entrez: 26 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Relapse rates of 47 % have been reported in patients with neuromyelitis optica (NMOSD) using Azathioprine (AZA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Prediction of non-responders could help determine which patients are most likely to benefit from newer monoclonal antibody treatments from the outset. To identify predictors of AZA and MMF treatment response in NMOSD. Multicenter cohort study of NMOSD patients from Brazil and the United Kingdom, treated with AZA and MMF. An unsatisfactory response was defined as one severe or two non-severe attacks in a year. Cox regression was used to identify predictive factors of unsatisfactory response to AZA and MMF. 103 NMOSD patients, mean age 38 years, 83% female, and 65% of Black ethnic group were included. An unsatisfactory IS response was observed in 42% of patients over 2.5 years (IQR 1.0-8.8) years. A severe preceding attack was more common in non-responders (31.1% x 76.7%, p = <0.001). In multivariable analysis, severe attack (RR 3.13; 95 % CI 1.37-7.18, p = 0.007) or higher annualized relapse rate (RR 4.84; 95 % CI 2.01-11.65, p = < 0.001) predicted an unsatisfactory response. Interestingly, Black NMOSD patients had a lower risk of poor response (RR 0.39, 95 % CI 0.17-0.85, p = 0.019). Severe attack and a higher annualized relapse rate before AZA or MMF initiation were associated with an unsatisfactory IS response. In patients with these characteristics, treatment with higher-efficacy drugs should be considered from the outset.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Relapse rates of 47 % have been reported in patients with neuromyelitis optica (NMOSD) using Azathioprine (AZA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Prediction of non-responders could help determine which patients are most likely to benefit from newer monoclonal antibody treatments from the outset.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
To identify predictors of AZA and MMF treatment response in NMOSD.
METHODS METHODS
Multicenter cohort study of NMOSD patients from Brazil and the United Kingdom, treated with AZA and MMF. An unsatisfactory response was defined as one severe or two non-severe attacks in a year. Cox regression was used to identify predictive factors of unsatisfactory response to AZA and MMF.
RESULTS RESULTS
103 NMOSD patients, mean age 38 years, 83% female, and 65% of Black ethnic group were included. An unsatisfactory IS response was observed in 42% of patients over 2.5 years (IQR 1.0-8.8) years. A severe preceding attack was more common in non-responders (31.1% x 76.7%, p = <0.001). In multivariable analysis, severe attack (RR 3.13; 95 % CI 1.37-7.18, p = 0.007) or higher annualized relapse rate (RR 4.84; 95 % CI 2.01-11.65, p = < 0.001) predicted an unsatisfactory response. Interestingly, Black NMOSD patients had a lower risk of poor response (RR 0.39, 95 % CI 0.17-0.85, p = 0.019).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Severe attack and a higher annualized relapse rate before AZA or MMF initiation were associated with an unsatisfactory IS response. In patients with these characteristics, treatment with higher-efficacy drugs should be considered from the outset.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38277981
pii: S2211-0348(24)00031-2
doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2024.105452
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

105452

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest None.

Auteurs

Daniel Lordelo San Martin (DL)

Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil 40026-010. Electronic address: daniel_lordelo@hotmail.com.

Thiago Gonçalves Fukuda (TG)

Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil 40026-010.

Thiago Santos Nascimento (TS)

Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil 40026-010.

Mariana Brito Silva (MB)

Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil 40026-010.

Marcos Baruch Portela Filho (MBP)

State University of Bahia. Salvador, Brazil 41.150-000.

Mirasol Forcadela (M)

NMOSD National Service, Walton Centre Foundation Trust Liverpool, United Kingdom L9 7LI. Electronic address: mirasol.forcadela@nhs.net.

Chiara Rocchi (C)

NMOSD National Service, Walton Centre Foundation Trust Liverpool, United Kingdom L9 7LI. Electronic address: chiara.rocchi@nhs.net.

Emily Gibbons (E)

NMOSD National Service, Walton Centre Foundation Trust Liverpool, United Kingdom L9 7LI. Electronic address: emily.gibbons@nhs.net.

Shahd Hamid (S)

NMOSD National Service, Walton Centre Foundation Trust Liverpool, United Kingdom L9 7LI. Electronic address: shahd.hamid1@nhs.net.

Saif Huda (S)

NMOSD National Service, Walton Centre Foundation Trust Liverpool, United Kingdom L9 7LI. Electronic address: shuda@nhs.net.

Jamary Oliveira-Filho (J)

Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil 40026-010. Electronic address: jamary@mail.harvard.edu.

Classifications MeSH