Biophotonics-Intraoperative Guidance During Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Biophotonics Intraoperative guidance Kidney cancer Partial nephrectomy Selective clamping

Journal

European urology focus
ISSN: 2405-4569
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol Focus
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101665661

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 02 11 2023
revised: 11 12 2023
accepted: 15 01 2024
medline: 27 1 2024
pubmed: 27 1 2024
entrez: 26 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Partial nephrectomy (PN) with intraoperative guidance by biophotonics has the potential to improve surgical outcomes due to higher precision. However, its value remains unclear since high-level evidence is lacking. To provide a comprehensive analysis of biophotonic techniques used for intraoperative real-time assistance during PN. We performed a comprehensive database search based on the PICO criteria, including studies published before October 2022. Two independent reviewers screened the titles and abstracts followed by full-text screening of eligible studies. For a quantitative analysis, a meta-analysis was conducted. In total, 35 studies were identified for the qualitative analysis, including 27 studies on near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging using indocyanine green, four studies on hyperspectral imaging, two studies on folate-targeted molecular imaging, and one study each on optical coherence tomography and 5-aminolevulinic acid. The meta-analysis investigated seven studies on selective arterial clamping using NIRF. There was a significantly shorter warm ischemia time in the NIRF-PN group (mean difference [MD]: -2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -5.6, -0.1; p = 0.04). No differences were noted regarding transfusions (odds ratio [OR]: 0.5; 95% CI: 0.2, 1.7; p = 0.27), positive surgical margins (OR: 0.7; 95% CI: 0.2, 2.0; p = 0.46), or major complications (OR: 0.4; 95% CI: 0.1, 1.2; p = 0.08). In the NIRF-PN group, functional results were favorable at short-term follow-up (MD of glomerular filtration rate decline: 7.6; 95% CI: 4.6, 10.5; p < 0.01), but leveled off at long-term follow-up (MD: 7.0; 95% CI: -2.8, 16.9; p = 0.16). Remarkably, these findings were not confirmed by the included randomized controlled trial. Biophotonics comprises a heterogeneous group of imaging modalities that serve intraoperative decision-making and guidance. Implementation into clinical practice and cost effectiveness are the limitations that should be addressed by future research. We reviewed the application of biophotonics during partial removal of the kidney in patients with kidney cancer. Our results suggest that these techniques support the surgeon in successfully performing the challenging steps of the procedure.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38278713
pii: S2405-4569(24)00008-7
doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.01.005
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Luisa Egen (L)

Department of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim at Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany. Electronic address: luisa.egen@umm.de.

Greta S Demmel (GS)

Department of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim at Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.

Maurizio Grilli (M)

Library of the Medical Faculty Mannheim at Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.

Alexander Studier-Fischer (A)

Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Felix Nickel (F)

Department of General, Visceral, and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Caelan M Haney (CM)

Department of Urology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Julia Mühlbauer (J)

Department of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim at Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.

Friedrich O Hartung (FO)

Department of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim at Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.

Hanna S Menold (HS)

Department of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim at Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.

Pietro Piazza (P)

Association of Urology Young Academic Urologist-Urotechnology Working Party, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Juan Gomez Rivas (JG)

Association of Urology Young Academic Urologist-Urotechnology Working Party, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.

Enrico Checcucci (E)

Association of Urology Young Academic Urologist-Urotechnology Working Party, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery, FPO-IRCCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, Turin, Italy.

Stefano Puliatti (S)

Association of Urology Young Academic Urologist-Urotechnology Working Party, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, University of Modena, and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.

Ines Rivero Belenchon (IR)

Association of Urology Young Academic Urologist-Urotechnology Working Party, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Urology and Nephrology Department, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Seville, Spain.

Mark Taratkin (M)

Association of Urology Young Academic Urologist-Urotechnology Working Party, Arnhem, The Netherlands.

Severin Rodler (S)

Association of Urology Young Academic Urologist-Urotechnology Working Party, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, University Hospital LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Giovanni Cacciamani (G)

Association of Urology Young Academic Urologist-Urotechnology Working Party, Arnhem, The Netherlands; USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Maurice S Michel (MS)

Department of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim at Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.

Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski (KF)

Department of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim at Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Association of Urology Young Academic Urologist-Urotechnology Working Party, Arnhem, The Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH