The cost of monitoring in time-based prospective memory.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Jan 2024
27 Jan 2024
Historique:
received:
25
05
2023
accepted:
19
01
2024
medline:
28
1
2024
pubmed:
28
1
2024
entrez:
27
1
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Time-based prospective memory (TBPM) involves remembering to perform actions at specific times in the future. Several studies suggest that monetary consequences improve prospective remembering; however, the effect of monetary consequences on strategic time monitoring (i.e., clock-checking behaviour) in TBPM is still unknown. The present study investigated how the monetary costs on clock-checking affected TBPM accuracy and strategic time monitoring. Participants performed an ongoing lexical decision task while carrying out a TBPM task every two minutes. Motivational incentives were manipulated across three experimental conditions: a single-cost condition in which missed TBPM responses led to monetary deductions, a double-cost condition in which both missed responses and time monitoring led to monetary deductions, and a control condition with no monetary deductions. Overall, the findings indicated that monetary costs on clock-checking prompted more parsimonious strategic time monitoring behaviour, which negatively impacted TBPM accuracy. These results emphasize the importance of weighing the motivational aspects involved in strategic monitoring, shedding light on the complex relationship between clock-checking behaviour, its consequences, and TBPM performance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38280894
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52501-w
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-52501-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2279Subventions
Organisme : Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
ID : 51NF40-185901
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Einstein, G. O. & McDaniel, M. A. Normal aging and prospective memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 16, 717–726 (1990).
pubmed: 2142956
doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.16.4.717
Hering, A., Kliegel, M., Rendell, P. G., Craik, F. I. M. & Rose, N. S. Prospective memory is a key predictor of functional independence in older adults. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 24, 640–645 (2018).
pubmed: 29606153
doi: 10.1017/S1355617718000152
Suchy, Y. Introduction to special issue: Contextually valid assessment of executive functions in the era of personalized medicine. Clin. Neuropsychol. 34, 613–618 (2020).
pubmed: 32295481
doi: 10.1080/13854046.2020.1748827
Woods, S. P. et al. Does prospective memory influence quality of life in community-dwelling older adults?. Aging Neuropsychol. Cogn. 22, 679–692 (2015).
doi: 10.1080/13825585.2015.1027651
Labelle, M. A., Graf, P., Grondin, S. & Gagné-Roy, L. Time-related processes in time-based prospective memory and in time-interval production. Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol. 21, 501–521 (2009).
doi: 10.1080/09541440802031000
Mioni, G., Grondin, S., McLennan, S. N. & Stablum, F. The role of time-monitoring behaviour in time-based prospective memory performance in younger and older adults. Memory 28, 34–48 (2020).
pubmed: 31594475
doi: 10.1080/09658211.2019.1675711
Wilson, M. D., Strickland, L., Farrell, S., Visser, T. A. W. & Loft, S. Prospective memory performance in simulated air traffic control: Robust to interruptions but impaired by retention interval. Hum. Factors 62, 1249–1264 (2020).
pubmed: 31539282
doi: 10.1177/0018720819875888
Kliegel, M., Martin, M., McDaniel, M. A. & Einstein, G. O. Varying the importance of a prospective memory task: Differential effects across time- and event-based prospective memory. Memory 9, 1–11 (2001).
pubmed: 11315657
doi: 10.1080/09658210042000003
Kliegel, M., Martin, M., McDaniel, M. & Einstein, G. Importance effects on performance in event-based prospective memory tasks. Memory 12, 553–561 (2004).
pubmed: 15615314
doi: 10.1080/09658210344000099
Schnitzspahn, K. M., Kvavilashvili, L. & Altgassen, M. Redefining the pattern of age-prospective memory-paradox: New insights on age effects in lab-based, naturalistic, and self-assigned tasks. Psychol. Res. 84, 1370–1386 (2020).
pubmed: 30588544
doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1140-2
Rummel, J., Snijder, J.-P. & Kvavilashvili, L. Prospective memories in the wild: Predicting memory for intentions in natural environments. Mem. Cogn. 51, 1061–1075 (2023).
doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01379-y
Cook, G. I., Rummel, J. & Dummel, S. Toward an understanding of motivational influences on prospective memory using value-added intentions. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9, 278 (2015).
pubmed: 26042017
pmcid: 4435068
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00278
Horn, S. S. & Freund, A. M. How do gain and loss incentives affect memory for intentions across adulthood?. J. Gerontol. B 76, 711–721 (2021).
doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa140
Penningroth, S. & Scott, W. A motivational-cognitive model of prospective memory: The influence of goal relevance. Psychol. Motiv. 1, 115–128 (2007).
Shah, J. Y., Friedman, R. & Kruglanski, A. W. Forgetting all else: On the antecedents and consequences of goal shielding. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 83, 1261–1280 (2002).
pubmed: 12500810
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1261
Brandimonte, M. A., Ferrante, D., Bianco, C. & Villani, M. G. Memory for pro-social intentions: When competing motives collide. Cognition 114, 436–441 (2010).
pubmed: 19913218
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.011
Horn, S. S. & Freund, A. M. Adult age differences in remembering gain- and loss-related intentions. Cogn. Emot. 35, 1652–1669 (2021).
pubmed: 34637692
doi: 10.1080/02699931.2021.1986375
Aberle, I., Rendell, P. G., Rose, N. S., McDaniel, M. A. & Kliegel, M. The age prospective memory paradox: Young adults may not give their best outside of the lab. Dev. Psychol. 46, 1444–1453 (2010).
pubmed: 21058832
pmcid: 3071572
doi: 10.1037/a0020718
Meacham, J. A. & Singer, J. Incentive effects in prospective remembering. J. Psychol. Interdiscipl. Appl. 97, 191–197 (1977).
doi: 10.1080/00223980.1977.9923962
Freund, A. M. & Ebner, N. C. The aging self: Shifting from promoting gains to balancing losses. in The Adaptive Self: Personal Continuity and Intentional Self-development, 185–202 (Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, 2005).
Mäntylä, T., Carelli, M. G. & Forman, H. Time monitoring and executive functioning in children and adults. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 96, 1–19 (2006).
pubmed: 17030038
doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2006.08.003
Mioni, G., Santon, S., Stablum, F. & Cornoldi, C. Time-based prospective memory difficulties in children with ADHD and the role of time perception and working memory. Child Neuropsychol. 23, 588–608 (2017).
pubmed: 27094171
doi: 10.1080/09297049.2016.1172561
Munaretto, G., Stragà, M., Mäntylä, T., Mioni, G. & Missier, F. D. External time monitoring in time-based prospective memory: An integrative framework. Cogn. Sci. 46, 12 (2022).
doi: 10.1111/cogs.13216
Vanneste, S., Baudouin, A., Bouazzaoui, B. & Taconnat, L. Age-related differences in time-based prospective memory: The role of time estimation in the clock monitoring strategy. Memory 24, 812–825 (2016).
pubmed: 26247302
doi: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1054837
Mioni, G. & Stablum, F. Monitoring behaviour in a time-based prospective memory task: The involvement of executive functions and time perception. Memory 22, 536–552 (2014).
pubmed: 23734633
doi: 10.1080/09658211.2013.801987
Harris, J. & Wilkins, A. Remembering to do things: A theoretical framework and an illustrative experiment. Hum. Learn. 1, 123–136 (1982).
Niedźwieńska, A. & Barzykowski, K. The age prospective memory paradox within the same sample in time-based and event-based tasks. Aging Neuropsychol. Cogn. 19, 58–83 (2012).
doi: 10.1080/13825585.2011.628374
Huang, T., Loft, S. & Humphreys, M. S. Internalizing versus externalizing control: Different ways to perform a time-based prospective memory task. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 40, 1064–1071 (2014).
pubmed: 24548325
doi: 10.1037/a0035786
Altgassen, M., Kliegel, M., Brandimonte, M. A. & Filippello, P. Are older adults more social than Younger Adults? Social importance increases older Adults’ prospective memory performance. Aging Neuropsychol. Cogn. 17, 312–328 (2010).
doi: 10.1080/13825580903281308
Schnitzspahn, K. M., Zeintl, M., Jäger, T. & Kliegel, M. Metacognition in prospective memory: Are performance predictions accurate?. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 65, 19–26 (2011).
pubmed: 21443326
doi: 10.1037/a0022842
Joly-Burra, E. et al. Frequency and strategicness of clock-checking explain detrimental age effects in time-based prospective memory. Psychol. Aging 37, 637–648 (2022).
pubmed: 35653723
doi: 10.1037/pag0000693
Maylor, E. A., Smith, G., Sala, S. D. & Logie, R. H. Prospective and retrospective memory in normal aging and dementia: An experimental study. Mem. Cogn. 30, 871–884 (2002).
doi: 10.3758/BF03195773
Kruglanski, A. W. et al. A theory of goal systems. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 34, 331–378 (2002).
doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(02)80008-9
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G. & Buchner, A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 39, 175–191 (2007).
pubmed: 17695343
doi: 10.3758/BF03193146
Finley, A. J. & Penningroth, S. L. Online versus in-lab: Pros and cons of an online prospective memory experiment. Adv. Psychol. Res. 113, 135–162 (2015).
Logie, R. H. & Maylor, E. A. An Internet study of prospective memory across adulthood. Psychol. Aging 24, 767–774 (2009).
pubmed: 19739935
doi: 10.1037/a0015479
Peirce, J. et al. PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behav. Res. 51, 195–203 (2019).
doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
Bridges, D., Pitiot, A., MacAskill, M. R. & Peirce, J. W. The timing mega-study: Comparing a range of experiment generators, both lab-based and online. PeerJ 8, e9414 (2020).
pubmed: 33005482
pmcid: 7512138
doi: 10.7717/peerj.9414
Balota, D. A. et al. The English Lexicon project. Behav. Res. Methods 39, 445–459 (2007).
pubmed: 17958156
doi: 10.3758/BF03193014
Thönes, S. & Stocker, K. A standard conceptual framework for the study of subjective time. Conscious. Cogn. 71, 114–122 (2019).
pubmed: 31004875
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.04.004
Gächter, S., Johnson, E. J. & Herrmann, A. Individual-level loss aversion in riskless and risky choices. Theor. Decis. 92, 599–624 (2022).
doi: 10.1007/s11238-021-09839-8
Wittmann, M. & Lehnhoff, S. Age effects in perception of time. Psychol. Rep. 97, 921–935 (2005).
pubmed: 16512313
doi: 10.2466/pr0.97.3.921-935
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/ (2022).
OpenAI. ChatGPT. (2023).
The Jamovi Project. jamovi (Version 1.6) https://www.jamovi.org/ (2021).
Gallucci, M. PATHj: Path analysis in jamovi. https://pathj.github.io/ (2021).
Smith, R. E. & Bayen, U. J. A multinomial model of event-based prospective memory. J. Exp. Psychol. 30, 756–777 (2004).
Block, R. A. & Zakay, D. Prospective remembering involves time estimation and memory processes. In Timing the Future (eds Glicksohn, J. & Myslobodsky, M. S.) 25–49 (World Scientific, 2006).
doi: 10.1142/9789812707123_0002
Cicogna, P. C., Nigro, G., Occhionero, M. & Esposito, M. J. Time-based prospective remembering: Interference and facilitation in a dual task. Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol. 17, 221–240 (2005).
doi: 10.1080/09541440340000556
Occhionero, M., Esposito, M. J., Cicogna, P. C. & Nigro, G. The effects of ongoing activity on time estimation in prospective remembering. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 24, 774–791 (2010).
doi: 10.1002/acp.1585
Germine, L. et al. Is the Web as good as the lab? Comparable performance from Web and lab in cognitive/perceptual experiments. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 19, 847–857 (2012).
pubmed: 22829343
doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0296-9
Greene, N. R. & Naveh-Benjamin, M. Online experimentation and sampling in cognitive aging research. Psychol. Aging 37, 72–83 (2022).
pubmed: 35113615
doi: 10.1037/pag0000655
Uittenhove, K., Jeanneret, S. & Vergauwe, E. From lab-testing to web-testing in cognitive research: Who you test is more important than how you test. J. Cogn. 6, 13 (2023).
pubmed: 36721797
pmcid: 9854315
doi: 10.5334/joc.259
Gilbert, S. J. Strategic use of reminders: Influence of both domain-general and task-specific metacognitive confidence, independent of objective memory ability. Conscious. Cogn. 33, 245–260 (2015).
pubmed: 25666463
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.01.006
Zuber, S. et al. The Geneva Space Cruiser: A fully self-administered online tool to assess prospective memory across the adult lifespan. Memory 30, 117–132 (2022).
pubmed: 34699342
doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1995435
Webb, M. A. & Tangney, J. P. Too good to be true: Bots and bad data from mechanical Turk. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221120027 (2022).
doi: 10.1177/17456916221120027
pubmed: 36343213