Contribution of the alternative model for DSM-5 personality disorders to relationship satisfaction.
Alternative Model for Personality Disorders
intimate relationships
personality disorders
private practice clinics
relationship satisfaction
Journal
Frontiers in psychiatry
ISSN: 1664-0640
Titre abrégé: Front Psychiatry
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101545006
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
08
09
2023
accepted:
05
12
2023
medline:
29
1
2024
pubmed:
29
1
2024
entrez:
29
1
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Personality is a central factor associated with relationship discord, conflicts, and separation, as well as with dyadic adjustment and relationship stability. The Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) of the DSM-5 offers a hybrid model for understanding personality based on personality dysfunction (Criterion A) and pathological domains and facets (Criterion B). So far, few studies have integrated this model into the understanding of relationship quality. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the contribution of Criterion B to relationship satisfaction in individuals involved in an intimate relationship. We also explored the joint contribution of Criteria A and B, as well as their interaction effects, to relationship satisfaction. Participants were drawn from two clinical samples: patients with personality disorders (PD; Hierarchical regressions showed that, for the PD sample, the Detachment and Negative Affectivity domains, especially the pathological facets of Intimacy Avoidance and Separation Insecurity, explained 22.5% of relationship satisfaction's variance. For PPC clients, Detachment, Negative Affectivity, and Antagonism domains, and especially the pathological facets of Intimacy Avoidance, Anxiousness, and Grandiosity, contribute significantly to relationship satisfaction, explaining 14.8% of its variance. Criterion A elements did not evince incremental value to the regression models in the PPC sample, and no Criteria A and B interaction effects were found. Clinical implications as well as limitations of the study are discussed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38283893
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1291226
pmc: PMC10811608
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1291226Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Savard, Deschênes, Gagné-Pomerleau, Payant, Mayrand, Nolin, Marcoux and Gamache.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.