The Effect of Practitioner Empathy on Patient Satisfaction : A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials.


Journal

Annals of internal medicine
ISSN: 1539-3704
Titre abrégé: Ann Intern Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372351

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Jan 2024
Historique:
medline: 29 1 2024
pubmed: 29 1 2024
entrez: 29 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Practitioners who deliver enhanced empathy may improve patient satisfaction with care. Patient satisfaction is associated with positive patient outcomes ranging from medication adherence to survival. To evaluate the effect of health care practitioner empathy on patient satisfaction, using a systematic review of randomized trials. Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus to 23 October 2023. Randomized trials published in any language that evaluated the effect of empathy on improving patient satisfaction as measured on a validated patient satisfaction scale. Data extraction, risk-of-bias assessments, and strength-of-evidence assessments were done by 2 independent reviewers. Disagreements were resolved through consensus. Fourteen eligible randomized trials (80 practitioners; 1986 patients) were included in the analysis. Five studies had high risk of bias, and 9 had some concerns about bias. The trials were heterogeneous in terms of geographic locations (North America, Europe, Asia, and Africa), settings (hospital and primary care), practitioner types (family and hospital physicians, anesthesiologists, nurses, psychologists, and caregivers), and type of randomization (individual patient or clustered by practitioner). Although all trials suggested a positive change in patient satisfaction, inadequate reporting hindered the ability to draw definitive conclusions about the overall effect size. Heterogeneity in the way that empathy was delivered and patient satisfaction was measured and incomplete reporting leading to concerns about the certainty of the underpinning evidence. Various empathy interventions have been studied to improve patient satisfaction. Development, testing, and reporting of high-quality studies within well-defined contexts is needed to optimize empathy interventions that increase patient satisfaction. Stoneygate Trust. (PROSPERO: CRD42023412981).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND UNASSIGNED
Practitioners who deliver enhanced empathy may improve patient satisfaction with care. Patient satisfaction is associated with positive patient outcomes ranging from medication adherence to survival.
PURPOSE UNASSIGNED
To evaluate the effect of health care practitioner empathy on patient satisfaction, using a systematic review of randomized trials.
DATA SOURCES UNASSIGNED
Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus to 23 October 2023.
STUDY SELECTION UNASSIGNED
Randomized trials published in any language that evaluated the effect of empathy on improving patient satisfaction as measured on a validated patient satisfaction scale.
DATA EXTRACTION UNASSIGNED
Data extraction, risk-of-bias assessments, and strength-of-evidence assessments were done by 2 independent reviewers. Disagreements were resolved through consensus.
DATA SYNTHESIS UNASSIGNED
Fourteen eligible randomized trials (80 practitioners; 1986 patients) were included in the analysis. Five studies had high risk of bias, and 9 had some concerns about bias. The trials were heterogeneous in terms of geographic locations (North America, Europe, Asia, and Africa), settings (hospital and primary care), practitioner types (family and hospital physicians, anesthesiologists, nurses, psychologists, and caregivers), and type of randomization (individual patient or clustered by practitioner). Although all trials suggested a positive change in patient satisfaction, inadequate reporting hindered the ability to draw definitive conclusions about the overall effect size.
LIMITATIONS UNASSIGNED
Heterogeneity in the way that empathy was delivered and patient satisfaction was measured and incomplete reporting leading to concerns about the certainty of the underpinning evidence.
CONCLUSION UNASSIGNED
Various empathy interventions have been studied to improve patient satisfaction. Development, testing, and reporting of high-quality studies within well-defined contexts is needed to optimize empathy interventions that increase patient satisfaction.
PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE UNASSIGNED
Stoneygate Trust. (PROSPERO: CRD42023412981).

Identifiants

pubmed: 38285985
doi: 10.7326/M23-2168
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Leila Keshtkar (L)

Stoneygate Centre for Empathic Healthcare, Leicester Medical School, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom (L.K., A.W., I.R., J.H.).

Claire D Madigan (CD)

Centre for Lifestyle Medicine and Behaviour (CLiMB), The School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom (C.D.M.).

Andy Ward (A)

Stoneygate Centre for Empathic Healthcare, Leicester Medical School, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom (L.K., A.W., I.R., J.H.).

Sarah Ahmed (S)

Leicester, United Kingdom (S.A.).

Vinay Tanna (V)

Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom (V.T.).

Ismail Rahman (I)

Stoneygate Centre for Empathic Healthcare, Leicester Medical School, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom (L.K., A.W., I.R., J.H.).

Jennifer Bostock (J)

London School of Economics, London, United Kingdom (J.B.).

Keith Nockels (K)

Library and Learning Services, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom (K.N.).

Wen Wang (W)

School of Business, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom (W.W.).

Clare L Gillies (CL)

Leicester Real World Evidence Unit, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom (C.L.G.).

Jeremy Howick (J)

Stoneygate Centre for Empathic Healthcare, Leicester Medical School, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom (L.K., A.W., I.R., J.H.).

Classifications MeSH