Age-Stratified Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis.

Aortic Stenosis Bicuspid aortic valve Bioprosthesis Lifetime Management Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

Journal

The Annals of thoracic surgery
ISSN: 1552-6259
Titre abrégé: Ann Thorac Surg
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 15030100R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 07 11 2023
revised: 22 01 2024
accepted: 23 01 2024
medline: 30 1 2024
pubmed: 30 1 2024
entrez: 29 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The management of aortic stenosis (AS) has evolved to stratification by age as reflected in recent societal guidelines. We evaluated age-stratified surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) trends and outcomes in patients with bicuspid (BAV) or tricuspid (TAV) aortic valves from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. This cohort included adults (≥18 years) undergoing SAVR for severe AS between July 2011 and December 2022. Comparisons were stratified by age (<65, 65-79, ≥80 years) and BAV/TAV status. Primary endpoints included operative mortality, composite morbidity/mortality, and permanent stroke. Observed-to-expected (O/E) ratios by STS-predicted risk of mortality (PROM) were calculated. In total, 200,849 SAVR patients [55,326 BAV (27.5%), 145,526 TAV (72.5%)] from 1,238 participating hospitals met study criteria. Annual SAVR volumes decreased by 45% (19,560 to 10,851) over the study period. The decrease was greatest (96%) among patients ≥80 years of age (4,914 to 207). The relative prevalence of BAV was greater in younger patients [<65: 69,068 (49.5% BAV); 65-79: 104,382 (19.1% BAV); ≥80: 27,399 (4.5% BAV)]. The observed mortality in <80 years old BAV patients (<65: 1.08, 65-79: 1.21, ≥80: 3.68) was better than the expected mortality rate (<65: 1.22, 65-79: 1.54, ≥80: 3.14). SAVR volume in the transcatheter era has decreased substantially, particularly for patients ≥80 years old and for those with TAV. Younger patients with BAV have better-than-expected outcomes, which should be carefully considered during shared-decision making in the treatment of AS. SAVR should remain the preferred therapy in this population.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The management of aortic stenosis (AS) has evolved to stratification by age as reflected in recent societal guidelines. We evaluated age-stratified surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) trends and outcomes in patients with bicuspid (BAV) or tricuspid (TAV) aortic valves from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Adult Cardiac Surgery Database.
METHODS METHODS
This cohort included adults (≥18 years) undergoing SAVR for severe AS between July 2011 and December 2022. Comparisons were stratified by age (<65, 65-79, ≥80 years) and BAV/TAV status. Primary endpoints included operative mortality, composite morbidity/mortality, and permanent stroke. Observed-to-expected (O/E) ratios by STS-predicted risk of mortality (PROM) were calculated.
RESULTS RESULTS
In total, 200,849 SAVR patients [55,326 BAV (27.5%), 145,526 TAV (72.5%)] from 1,238 participating hospitals met study criteria. Annual SAVR volumes decreased by 45% (19,560 to 10,851) over the study period. The decrease was greatest (96%) among patients ≥80 years of age (4,914 to 207). The relative prevalence of BAV was greater in younger patients [<65: 69,068 (49.5% BAV); 65-79: 104,382 (19.1% BAV); ≥80: 27,399 (4.5% BAV)]. The observed mortality in <80 years old BAV patients (<65: 1.08, 65-79: 1.21, ≥80: 3.68) was better than the expected mortality rate (<65: 1.22, 65-79: 1.54, ≥80: 3.14).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
SAVR volume in the transcatheter era has decreased substantially, particularly for patients ≥80 years old and for those with TAV. Younger patients with BAV have better-than-expected outcomes, which should be carefully considered during shared-decision making in the treatment of AS. SAVR should remain the preferred therapy in this population.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38286202
pii: S0003-4975(24)00068-7
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.01.013
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Christopher K Mehta (CK)

Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL. Electronic address: christopher.mehta@nm.org.

Tom X Liu (TX)

Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL.

Levi Bonnell (L)

Society of Thoracic Surgeons Research and Analytic Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

Robert H Habib (RH)

Society of Thoracic Surgeons Research and Analytic Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

Tsuyoshi Kaneko (T)

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.

James D Flaherty (JD)

Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Division of Cardiology, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL.

Charles J Davidson (CJ)

Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Division of Cardiology, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL.

James D Thomas (JD)

Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Division of Cardiology, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL.

Vera H Rigolin (VH)

Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Division of Cardiology, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL.

Robert O Bonow (RO)

Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Division of Cardiology, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL.

Duc Thinh Pham (DT)

Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL.

Douglas R Johnston (DR)

Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL.

Patrick M McCarthy (PM)

Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL.

S Chris Malaisrie (SC)

Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL.

Classifications MeSH