Impact of daily cyclic enteral nutrition versus standard continuous enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial in three intensive care units in France (DC-SCENIC).

INTENSIVE & CRITICAL CARE NUTRITION & DIETETICS Protocols & guidelines Randomized Controlled Trial

Journal

BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 Jan 2024
Historique:
medline: 30 1 2024
pubmed: 30 1 2024
entrez: 29 1 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Current guidelines on clinical nutrition of ventilated patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) recommend initiating continuous enteral nutrition within 48 hours of ICU admission when feasible. However, discontinuous feeding regimens, alternating feeding and fasting intervals, may have an impact on clinical and patient centred outcomes. The ongoing "Impact of daily cyclic enteral nutrition versus standard continuous enteral nutrition in critically ill patients" (DC-SCENIC) trial aims to compare standard continuous enteral feeding with daily cyclic enteral feeding over 10 hours to evaluate if implementing a fasting-mimicking diet can decrease organ failure in ventilated patients during the acute phase of ICU management. DC-SCENIC is a randomised, controlled, multicentre, open-label trial comparing two parallel groups of patients 18 years of age or older receiving invasive mechanical ventilation and having an indication for enteral nutrition through a gastric tube. Enteral feeding is continuous in the control group and administered over 10 hours daily in the intervention group. Both groups receive isocaloric nutrition with 4 g of protein per 100 mL, and have the same 20 kcal/kg/day caloric target. The primary endpoint is the change in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score at 7 days compared with the day of inclusion in the study. Secondary outcomes include daily caloric and protein delivery, digestive, respiratory and metabolic tolerance as well as 28-day mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation and ventilator-free days. Outcomes will be analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. Recruitment started in June 2023 in 3 French ICU's and a sample size of 318 patients is expected by February 2026. This study received approval from the national ethics review board on 8 November 2022 (Comité de Protection des Personnes Sud-Est VI, registration number 2022-A00827-36). Patients are included after informed consent. Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. NCT05627167.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38286683
pii: bmjopen-2023-080003
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080003
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05627167']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e080003

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Jean-Christophe Callahan (JC)

Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier du Mans, Le Mans, France jccallahan@ch-lemans.fr.

Elsa Parot-Schinkel (E)

Biostatistics and Methodology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, Angers, France.

Pierre Asfar (P)

Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, Angers, France.

Stephan Ehrmann (S)

Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Tours, Tours, France.

Patrice Tirot (P)

Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier du Mans, Le Mans, France.

Christophe Guitton (C)

Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier du Mans, Le Mans, France.

Classifications MeSH