Screening and Confirmation of Psilocin, Mitragynine, Phencyclidine, Ketamine, and Ketamine Metabolites by Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry.

LC-MS/MS hallucinogens high-throughput workplace drug testing

Journal

Journal of analytical toxicology
ISSN: 1945-2403
Titre abrégé: J Anal Toxicol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7705085

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 09 11 2023
revised: 10 01 2024
accepted: 22 01 2024
medline: 30 1 2024
pubmed: 30 1 2024
entrez: 30 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

A safe and productive workplace requires a sober workforce, free from substances that impair judgment and concentration. Although drug monitoring programs already exist, the scope and loopholes of standard workplace testing panels are well-known, allowing other substances to remain a source of risk. Therefore, a high-throughput urine screening method for psilocin, mitragynine, phencyclidine, ketamine, norketamine, and dehydronorketamine was developed and validated in conjunction with a urine and blood confirmation method. There are analytical challenges to overcome with psilocin and mitragynine, particularly when it comes to drug stability and unambiguous identification in authentic specimens. Screening and confirmation methods were validated according to ANSI/ASB Standard 036, Standard Practices for Method Validation in Forensic Toxicology. An automated liquid handling system equipped with dispersive pipette extraction tips was utilized for preparing screening samples, whereas an offline SPE method was used for confirmation sample preparation. Both methods utilized liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry to achieve limits of detection between 1-5 ng/mL for the screening method and 1 ng/mL for the confirmation method. Automation allows for faster throughput and enhanced quality assurance, which improves turnaround time. Compared to previous in-house methods, specimen volumes were substantially decreased for both blood and urine, which is an advantage when volume is limited. This screening technique is well-suited for evaluating large numbers of specimens from those employed in safety-sensitive workforce positions. This method can be utilized by workplace drug testing, human performance, and postmortem laboratories seeking robust qualitative screening and confirmation methods for analytes that have traditionally been too challenging to routinely analyze.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38287693
pii: 7591598
doi: 10.1093/jat/bkae002
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : SNA International

Informations de copyright

Published by Oxford University Press 2024. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.

Auteurs

Madeleine E Wood (ME)

Division of Forensic Toxicology, Armed Forces Medical Examiner System, 115 Purple Heart Dr., Dover AFB, DE 19902, USA.

Glenna J Brown (GJ)

Division of Forensic Toxicology, Armed Forces Medical Examiner System, 115 Purple Heart Dr., Dover AFB, DE 19902, USA.

Erin L Karschner (EL)

Division of Forensic Toxicology, Armed Forces Medical Examiner System, 115 Purple Heart Dr., Dover AFB, DE 19902, USA.

Joshua Z Seither (JZ)

Division of Forensic Toxicology, Armed Forces Medical Examiner System, 115 Purple Heart Dr., Dover AFB, DE 19902, USA.

Jordan T Brown (JT)

Division of Forensic Toxicology, Armed Forces Medical Examiner System, 115 Purple Heart Dr., Dover AFB, DE 19902, USA.

Jessica L Knittel (JL)

Division of Forensic Toxicology, Armed Forces Medical Examiner System, 115 Purple Heart Dr., Dover AFB, DE 19902, USA.

Jeffrey P Walterscheid (JP)

Division of Forensic Toxicology, Armed Forces Medical Examiner System, 115 Purple Heart Dr., Dover AFB, DE 19902, USA.

Classifications MeSH