Predictive Performance of a Gentamicin Pharmacokinetic Model in Term Neonates with Perinatal Asphyxia Undergoing Controlled Therapeutic Hypothermia.


Journal

Therapeutic drug monitoring
ISSN: 1536-3694
Titre abrégé: Ther Drug Monit
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7909660

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 06 08 2023
accepted: 24 10 2023
medline: 30 1 2024
pubmed: 30 1 2024
entrez: 30 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Model validation procedures are crucial when population pharmacokinetic (PK) models are used to develop dosing algorithms and to perform model-informed precision dosing. We have previously published a population PK model describing the PK of gentamicin in term neonates with perinatal asphyxia during controlled therapeutic hypothermia (TH), which showed altered gentamicin clearance during the hypothermic phase dependent on gestational age and weight. In this study, the predictive performance and generalizability of this model were assessed using an independent data set of neonates with perinatal asphyxia undergoing controlled TH. The external data set contained a subset of neonates included in the prospective observational multicenter PharmaCool Study. Predictive performance was assessed by visually inspecting observed-versus-predicted concentration plots and calculating bias and precision. In addition, simulation-based diagnostics, model refitting, and bootstrap analyses were performed. The external data set included 323 gentamicin concentrations of 39 neonates. Both the model-building and external data set included neonates from multiple centers. The original gentamicin PK model predicted the observed gentamicin concentrations with adequate accuracy and precision during all phases of controlled TH. Model appropriateness was confirmed with prediction-corrected visual predictive checks and normalized prediction distribution error analyses. Model refitting to the merged data set (n = 86 neonates with 935 samples) showed accurate estimation of PK parameters. The results of this external validation study justify the generalizability of the gentamicin dosing recommendations made in the original study for neonates with perinatal asphyxia undergoing controlled TH (5 mg/kg every 36 or 24 h with gestational age 36-41 and 42 wk, respectively) and its applicability in model-informed precision dosing.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Model validation procedures are crucial when population pharmacokinetic (PK) models are used to develop dosing algorithms and to perform model-informed precision dosing. We have previously published a population PK model describing the PK of gentamicin in term neonates with perinatal asphyxia during controlled therapeutic hypothermia (TH), which showed altered gentamicin clearance during the hypothermic phase dependent on gestational age and weight. In this study, the predictive performance and generalizability of this model were assessed using an independent data set of neonates with perinatal asphyxia undergoing controlled TH.
METHODS METHODS
The external data set contained a subset of neonates included in the prospective observational multicenter PharmaCool Study. Predictive performance was assessed by visually inspecting observed-versus-predicted concentration plots and calculating bias and precision. In addition, simulation-based diagnostics, model refitting, and bootstrap analyses were performed.
RESULTS RESULTS
The external data set included 323 gentamicin concentrations of 39 neonates. Both the model-building and external data set included neonates from multiple centers. The original gentamicin PK model predicted the observed gentamicin concentrations with adequate accuracy and precision during all phases of controlled TH. Model appropriateness was confirmed with prediction-corrected visual predictive checks and normalized prediction distribution error analyses. Model refitting to the merged data set (n = 86 neonates with 935 samples) showed accurate estimation of PK parameters.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The results of this external validation study justify the generalizability of the gentamicin dosing recommendations made in the original study for neonates with perinatal asphyxia undergoing controlled TH (5 mg/kg every 36 or 24 h with gestational age 36-41 and 42 wk, respectively) and its applicability in model-informed precision dosing.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38287875
doi: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000001166
pii: 00007691-990000000-00181
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : ZonMw
ID : 40-41500-98-9002
Pays : Netherlands

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Références

Douglas-Escobar M, Weiss MD. Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: a review for the clinician. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169:397–403.
Nair J, Kumar VHS. Current and emerging therapies in the management of hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy in neonates. Children (Basel). 2018;5:99.
de Haan TR, Bijleveld YA, van der Lee JH, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of medication in asphyxiated newborns during controlled hypothermia. The PharmaCool multicenter study. BMC Pediatr. 2012;12:45.
Polin RA, Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Management of neonates with suspected or proven early-onset bacterial sepsis. Pediatrics. 2012;129:1006–1015.
Musiime GM, Seale AC, Moxon SG, et al. Risk of gentamicin toxicity in neonates treated for possible severe bacterial infection in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review. Trop Med Int Health. 2015;20:1593–1606.
Touw DJ, Westerman EM, Sprij AJ. Therapeutic drug monitoring of aminoglycosides in neonates. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2009;48:71–88.
Lutz IC, Allegaert K, de Hoon JN, et al. Pharmacokinetics during therapeutic hypothermia for neonatal hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy: a literature review. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2020;4:e000685.
Bijleveld YA, de Haan TR, van der Lee HJ, et al. Altered gentamicin pharmacokinetics in term neonates undergoing controlled hypothermia. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;81:1067–1077.
Tod M, Jullien V, Pons G. Facilitation of drug evaluation in children by population methods and modelling. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2008;47:231–243.
Krekels EH, DeJongh J, van Lingen RA, et al. Predictive performance of a recently developed population pharmacokinetic model for morphine and its metabolites in new datasets of (preterm) neonates, infants and children. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2011;50:51–63.
Bijleveld YA, Mathôt R, van der Lee JH, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of amoxicillin in term neonates undergoing moderate hypothermia. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018;103:458–467.
Sampson MR, Frymoyer A, Rattray B, et al. Predictive performance of a gentamicin population pharmacokinetic model in neonates receiving full-body hypothermia. Ther Drug Monit. 2014;36:584–589.
Cies JJ, Habib T, Bains V, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in neonates with hypoxemic-ischemic encephalopathy receiving controlled hypothermia. Pharmacotherapy. 2018;38:1120–1129.
Frymoyer A, Meng L, Bonifacio SL, et al. Gentamicin pharmacokinetics and dosing in neonates with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy receiving hypothermia. Pharmacotherapy. 2013;33:718–726.
Formulary. DP. Gentamicine. 2023 Available at: https://www.kinderformularium.nl/geneesmiddel/23/gentamicine.2023 Accessed August 10, 2023.
Bijleveld Y, de Haan T, Toersche J, et al. A simple quantitative method analysing amikacin, gentamicin, and vancomycin levels in human newborn plasma using ion-pair liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry and its applicability to a clinical study. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2014;951-952:110–118.
Bauer RJ. NONMEM tutorial part I: description of commands and options, with simple examples of population analysis. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2019;8:525–537.
Sheiner LB, Beal SL. Some suggestions for measuring predictive performance. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1981;9:503–512.
Bijleveld YA, van den Heuvel ME, Hodiamont CJ, et al. Population pharmacokinetics and dosing considerations for gentamicin in newborns with suspected or proven sepsis caused by gram-negative bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61:e01304–e01316.
Bergstrand M, Hooker AC, Wallin JE, et al. Prediction-corrected visual predictive checks for diagnosing nonlinear mixed-effects models. AAPS J. 2011;13:143–151.
Brendel K, Comets E, Laffont C, et al. Evaluation of different tests based on observations for external model evaluation of population analyses. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2010;37:49–65.
Brendel K, Dartois C, Comets E, et al. Are population pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic models adequately evaluated? A survey of the literature from 2002 to 2004. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2007;46:221–234.
Cheng Y, Wang CY, Li ZR, et al. Can population pharmacokinetics of antibiotics be extrapolated? Implications of external evaluations. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2021;60:53–68.
El Hassani M, Marsot A. External evaluation of population pharmacokinetic models for precision dosing: current state and knowledge gaps. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2023;62:533–540.
Aggarwal A, Kumar P, Chowdhary G, et al. Evaluation of renal functions in asphyxiated newborns. J Trop Pediatr. 2005;51:295–299.
Tong DMH, Hughes JH, Keizer RJ. Evaluating and improving neonatal gentamicin pharmacokinetic models using aggregated routine clinical care data. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:2089.

Auteurs

Marlotte A A van der Veer (MAA)

Department of Pharmacy & Clinical Pharmacology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Timo R de Haan (TR)

Department of Neonatology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Linda G W Franken (LGW)

Department of Pharmacy & Clinical Pharmacology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Floris Groenendaal (F)

Department of Neonatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Peter H Dijk (PH)

Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University Medical Center Groningen, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Willem P de Boode (WP)

Department of Neonatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Sinno Simons (S)

Department of Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Koen P Dijkman (KP)

Department of Neonatology, Máxima Medical Center Veldhoven, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.

Henrica L M van Straaten (HLM)

Department of Neonatology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands.

Monique Rijken (M)

Department of Neonatology, Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; and.

Filip Cools (F)

Department of Neonatology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

Debbie H G M Nuytemans (DHGM)

Department of Neonatology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Anton H van Kaam (AH)

Department of Neonatology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Yuma A Bijleveld (YA)

Department of Pharmacy & Clinical Pharmacology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Ron A A Mathôt (RAA)

Department of Pharmacy & Clinical Pharmacology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH