Fluorescence-Based Lateral Flow Immunoassay for Quantification of Infliximab: Analytical and Clinical Performance Evaluation.


Journal

Therapeutic drug monitoring
ISSN: 1536-3694
Titre abrégé: Ther Drug Monit
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7909660

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 13 07 2023
accepted: 15 11 2023
medline: 30 1 2024
pubmed: 30 1 2024
entrez: 30 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab (IFX) can improve treatment outcomes; however, the temporal gap between drug concentration monitoring and subsequent availability restricts its practical application. To address this issue, an automated monitoring method, AFIAS IFX, was developed to rapidly and accurately analyze IFX concentration in blood. The analytical and clinical performances of this method were assessed to establish its clinical utility. The analytical performance of AFIAS IFX was evaluated according to Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute guidelines. For clinical validation, AFIAS IFX was compared with 3 established enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits (LISA TRACKER, RIDASCREEN, and ImmunoGuide) using 100 consecutive samples from 28 patients treated with IFX. Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman analyses were performed to compare the methods. The detection and quantification limits of AFIAS IFX were 0.12 and 0.20 mcg/mL, respectively. Furthermore, AFIAS IFX analyzed samples within 10 minutes for concentrations up to 50 mcg/mL, exhibiting reproducibility (coefficient of variation [CV] ≤7.8%) and accuracy (recovery 98%-101%) with serum, plasma, and whole blood samples. Clinically, it exhibited a good correlation with the 3 established enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. For patients treated with Remicade (IFX), the Passing-Bablok regression slope was 1.001-1.259, with a mean difference of -1.48 to 0.28 mcg/mL. For patients treated with CT-P13, the Passing-Bablok regression slope was 0.974-1.254, with a mean difference of -2.44 to 0.15 mcg/mL. AFIAS IFX, a novel fluorescence-based lateral flow assay, exhibited excellent performance in analyzing IFX trough levels and is a potentially powerful tool for therapeutic drug monitoring in clinical settings, with opportunities for further development.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab (IFX) can improve treatment outcomes; however, the temporal gap between drug concentration monitoring and subsequent availability restricts its practical application. To address this issue, an automated monitoring method, AFIAS IFX, was developed to rapidly and accurately analyze IFX concentration in blood. The analytical and clinical performances of this method were assessed to establish its clinical utility.
METHODS METHODS
The analytical performance of AFIAS IFX was evaluated according to Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute guidelines. For clinical validation, AFIAS IFX was compared with 3 established enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits (LISA TRACKER, RIDASCREEN, and ImmunoGuide) using 100 consecutive samples from 28 patients treated with IFX. Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman analyses were performed to compare the methods.
RESULTS RESULTS
The detection and quantification limits of AFIAS IFX were 0.12 and 0.20 mcg/mL, respectively. Furthermore, AFIAS IFX analyzed samples within 10 minutes for concentrations up to 50 mcg/mL, exhibiting reproducibility (coefficient of variation [CV] ≤7.8%) and accuracy (recovery 98%-101%) with serum, plasma, and whole blood samples. Clinically, it exhibited a good correlation with the 3 established enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. For patients treated with Remicade (IFX), the Passing-Bablok regression slope was 1.001-1.259, with a mean difference of -1.48 to 0.28 mcg/mL. For patients treated with CT-P13, the Passing-Bablok regression slope was 0.974-1.254, with a mean difference of -2.44 to 0.15 mcg/mL.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
AFIAS IFX, a novel fluorescence-based lateral flow assay, exhibited excellent performance in analyzing IFX trough levels and is a potentially powerful tool for therapeutic drug monitoring in clinical settings, with opportunities for further development.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38287890
doi: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000001176
pii: 00007691-990000000-00183
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

M.L. and H.C. have been involved in the development of the product discussed in this paper, only. Their involvement was limited and not extend to any other aspects of this study. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

Références

Aardoom MA, Veereman G, de Ridder L. A review on the use of anti-TNF in children and adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:2529.
Prignano F, Choi J, Pieper B, et al. Anti-tumor necrosis factor agents in psoriasis: addressing key challenges using biosimilars. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2021;21:75–80.
Lata M, Hettinghouse AS, Liu CJ. Targeting tumor necrosis factor receptors in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2019;1442:5–16.
Jang DI, Lee AH, Shin HY, et al. The Role of Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) in autoimmune disease and current TNF-α inhibitors in therapeutics. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:2719.
Farrugia M, Baron B. The role of TNF-α in rheumatoid arthritis: a focus on regulatory T cells. J Clin Transl Res. 2016;2:84–90.
Ben-Horin S, Chowers Y. Review article: loss of response to anti-TNF treatments in Crohn's disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;33:987–995.
Steenholdt C, Ainsworth MA, Tovey M, et al. Comparison of techniques for monitoring infliximab and antibodies against infliximab in Crohn's disease. Ther Drug Monit. 2013;35:530–538.
Gomollón F, Dignass A, Annese V, et al. 3rd European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn's disease 2016: Part 1: diagnosis and medical management. J Crohns Colitis. 2017;11:3–25.
Fernandes SR, Bernardo S, Simões C, et al. Proactive infliximab drug monitoring is superior to conventional management in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2020;26:263–270.
Roda G, Jharap B, Neeraj N, et al. Loss of response to anti-TNFs: definition, epidemiology, and management. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2016;7:e135.
Savelkoul EHJ, Thomas PWA, Derikx LAAP, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis: loss of response and need for dose escalation of infliximab and adalimumab in ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2023;29:1633–1647.
Gisbert JP, Chaparro M. Primary failure to an anti-TNF agent in inflammatory bowel disease: switch (to a second anti-TNF agent) or swap (for another mechanism of action)?. J Clin Med. 2021;10:5318.
Gisbert JP, Panés J. Loss of response and requirement of infliximab dose intensification in Crohn's disease: a review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:760–767.
Pouillon L, Ferrante M, Van Assche G, et al. Mucosal healing and long-term outcomes of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases receiving clinic-based vs trough concentration-based dosing of infliximab. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;16:1276–1283.e1.
Argollo M, Kotze PG, Kakkadasam P, et al. Optimizing biologic therapy in IBD: how essential is therapeutic drug monitoring? Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;17:702–710.
Vande Casteele N, Ferrante M, Van Assche G, et al. Trough concentrations of infliximab guide dosing for patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:1320–1329.e3.
Papamichael K, Chachu KA, Vajravelu RK, et al. Improved long-term outcomes of patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving proactive compared with reactive monitoring of serum concentrations of infliximab. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15:1580–1588.e3.
Ungar B, Levy I, Yavne Y, et al. Optimizing anti-TNF-α therapy: serum levels of infliximab and adalimumab are associated with mucosal healing in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14:550–557.e2.
Schmitz EMH, van de Kerkhof D, Hamann D, et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab: performance evaluation of three commercial ELISA kits. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016;54:1211–1219.
Lee MWM, Connor S, Ng W, et al. Comparison of infliximab drug measurement across three commercially available ELISA kits. Pathology. 2016;48:608–612.
Vermeire S, Dreesen E, Papamichael K, et al. How, when, and for whom should we perform therapeutic drug monitoring?. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18:1291–1299.
Ogrič M, Žigon P, Drobne D, et al. Routinely utilized in-house assays for infliximab, adalimumab and their anti-drug antibody levels. Immunol Res. 2018;66:726–736.
Ates HC, Roberts JA, Lipman J, et al. On-site therapeutic drug monitoring. Trends Biotechnol. 2020;38:1262–1277.
Afonso J, Lopes S, Gonçalves R, et al. Proactive therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab: a comparative study of a new point-of-care quantitative test with two established ELISA assays. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016;44:684–692.
Cherry M, Dutzer D, Nasser Y, et al. Point-of-care assays could be useful for therapeutic drug monitoring of IBD Patients in a proactive strategy with Adalimumab. J Clin Med. 2020;9:2739.
Facchin S, Buda A, Cardin R, et al. Rapid point-of-care anti-infliximab antibodies detection in clinical practice: comparison with ELISA and potential for improving therapeutic drug monitoring in IBD patients. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2021;14: 1756284821999902.
ThermoFisher Scientific. Fluorescent Amine-Reactive Alexa Fluor Dye Labeling of IgM Antibodies. https://www.thermofisher.com/kr/ko/home/references/protocols/cell-and-tissue-analysis/labeling-chemistry-protocols/fluorescent-amine-reactive-alexa-fluor-dye-labeling-of-igm-antibodies.html. Accessed October 17, 2023.
Thermo Fisher Scientific. EZ-Link® NHS-Biotin Reagents. https://www.thermofisher.com/document-connect/document-connect.html?url=https://assets.thermofisher.com/TFS-Assets%2FLSG%2Fmanuals%2FMAN0011206_EZ_NHS_Biotin_Reag_UG.pdf. Accessed October 17, 2023.
Mitrev N, Vande Casteele N, Seow CH, et al. Review article: consensus statements on therapeutic drug monitoring of anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy in inflammatory bowel diseases. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;46:1037–1053.

Auteurs

Eun Sil Kim (ES)

Department of Pediatrics, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Republic of Korea.
Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Republic of Korea.

Hyangah Chon (H)

Department of R&D, Boditech Med Inc., Gangwon-do, Republic of Korea; and.

Yiyoung Kwon (Y)

Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Republic of Korea.
Department of Pediatrics, Inha University School of Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, Republic of Korea.

Misook Lee (M)

Department of R&D, Boditech Med Inc., Gangwon-do, Republic of Korea; and.

Mi Jin Kim (MJ)

Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Republic of Korea.

Yon Ho Choe (YH)

Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Republic of Korea.

Classifications MeSH