Virtual pacing of a patient's digital twin to predict left ventricular reverse remodelling after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Identifying heart failure (HF) patients who will benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remains challenging. We evaluated whether virtual pacing in a digital twin (DT) of the patient's heart could be used to predict the degree of left ventricular (LV) reverse remodelling post-CRT. Forty-five HF patients with wide QRS complex (≥130 ms) and reduced LV ejection fraction (≤35%) receiving CRT were retrospectively enrolled. Echocardiography was performed before (baseline) and 6 months after CRT implantation to obtain LV volumes and 18-segment longitudinal strain. A previously developed algorithm was used to generate 45 DTs by personalizing the CircAdapt model to each patient's baseline measurements. From each DT, baseline septal-to-lateral myocardial work difference (MWLW-S,DT) and maximum rate of LV systolic pressure rise (dP/dtmax,DT) were derived. Biventricular pacing was then simulated using patient-specific atrioventricular delay and lead location. Virtual pacing-induced changes ΔMWLW-S,DT and ΔdP/dtmax,DT were correlated with real-world LV end-systolic volume change at 6-month follow-up (ΔLVESV). The DT's baseline MWLW-S,DT and virtual pacing-induced ΔMWLW-S,DT were both significantly associated with the real patient's reverse remodelling ΔLVESV (r = -0.60, P < 0.001 and r = 0.62, P < 0.001, respectively), while correlation between ΔdP/dtmax,DT and ΔLVESV was considerably weaker (r = -0.34, P = 0.02). Our results suggest that the reduction of septal-to-lateral work imbalance by virtual pacing in the DT can predict real-world post-CRT LV reverse remodelling. This DT approach could prove to be an additional tool in selecting HF patients for CRT and has the potential to provide valuable insights in optimization of CRT delivery.

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest: The authors of this manuscript report the following competing interests: K.V. has been a consultant for Medtronic, Abbott, Boston Scientific, Philips, and Biosense Webster (fees paid to institute) and has received research/educational grants from Medtronic, Abbott, and Biosense Webster (grants paid to institute); J.L. has received research grants from Medtronic and speaker fees from Abbott. Others have nothing to declare.