Is it feasible to nest a Trial within a Cohort Study (TwiCS) to evaluate an early years parenting programme? A Born in Bradford's Better Start study protocol.

Better Start Bradford Birth cohort Born in Bradford’s Better Start Feasibility Incredible years Parenting programme Trial within a cohort study

Journal

Pilot and feasibility studies
ISSN: 2055-5784
Titre abrégé: Pilot Feasibility Stud
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101676536

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 02 08 2023
accepted: 21 12 2023
medline: 31 1 2024
pubmed: 31 1 2024
entrez: 30 1 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Evaluating the effectiveness of early years parenting interventions provides evidence to improve the development and wellbeing of children. This protocol paper describes a study to explore the feasibility of evaluating the Incredible Years Toddler early life intervention programme, which is offered to parents of 1-3-year-olds via the Better Start Bradford programme. The study aims to use a Trial within a Cohort Study (TwiCS) design that randomly selects individuals participating in a cohort to be offered an intervention. The TwiCS information and consent process is person-centred and aims to replicate real-world practice whereby only those who are offered the intervention are given information about the intervention. The cohort is the Born in Bradford's Better Start (BiBBS) cohort, an interventional birth cohort recruiting expectant parents in three areas of Bradford, UK. The study will assess the feasibility of TwiCS procedures, staged consent, and intervention take-up. We will conduct a feasibility TwiCS to test study procedures. We aim to establish the following: (1) whether TwiCS methodology can be implemented to create control and intervention arms, whilst documenting any incidences of contamination within the cohort; (2) whether satisfactory rates of intervention uptake are achieved among participants allocated to the intervention; and (3) whether satisfactory rates of retention of participants in the intervention can be achieved. A Red Amber Green (RAG) rating system has been applied to support the feasibility assessment of each objective: to be rated red (not achieved), amber (partly achieved), and green (achieved). Eligible participants in the BiBBS cohort will be individually randomised 1:1 to the intervention or control arms, with stratification by child age (1 or 2 years old at the time of randomisation) and ethnicity (White British, South Asian, or other). BiBBS researchers will seek consent from participants randomised to the intervention to pass their contact details onto Incredible Years' delivery agents. This feasibility study will inform the utility of the TwiCs approach within an experimental birth cohort to evaluate interventions for infants, toddlers, and their families. The study was prospectively registered on ISRCTN (ISRCTN16150114).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Evaluating the effectiveness of early years parenting interventions provides evidence to improve the development and wellbeing of children. This protocol paper describes a study to explore the feasibility of evaluating the Incredible Years Toddler early life intervention programme, which is offered to parents of 1-3-year-olds via the Better Start Bradford programme. The study aims to use a Trial within a Cohort Study (TwiCS) design that randomly selects individuals participating in a cohort to be offered an intervention. The TwiCS information and consent process is person-centred and aims to replicate real-world practice whereby only those who are offered the intervention are given information about the intervention. The cohort is the Born in Bradford's Better Start (BiBBS) cohort, an interventional birth cohort recruiting expectant parents in three areas of Bradford, UK. The study will assess the feasibility of TwiCS procedures, staged consent, and intervention take-up.
METHODS METHODS
We will conduct a feasibility TwiCS to test study procedures. We aim to establish the following: (1) whether TwiCS methodology can be implemented to create control and intervention arms, whilst documenting any incidences of contamination within the cohort; (2) whether satisfactory rates of intervention uptake are achieved among participants allocated to the intervention; and (3) whether satisfactory rates of retention of participants in the intervention can be achieved. A Red Amber Green (RAG) rating system has been applied to support the feasibility assessment of each objective: to be rated red (not achieved), amber (partly achieved), and green (achieved). Eligible participants in the BiBBS cohort will be individually randomised 1:1 to the intervention or control arms, with stratification by child age (1 or 2 years old at the time of randomisation) and ethnicity (White British, South Asian, or other). BiBBS researchers will seek consent from participants randomised to the intervention to pass their contact details onto Incredible Years' delivery agents.
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
This feasibility study will inform the utility of the TwiCs approach within an experimental birth cohort to evaluate interventions for infants, toddlers, and their families.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
The study was prospectively registered on ISRCTN (ISRCTN16150114).

Identifiants

pubmed: 38291514
doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01441-9
pii: 10.1186/s40814-023-01441-9
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

19

Subventions

Organisme : National Lottery Community Fund
ID : 10094849
Organisme : National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Yorkshire and Humber
ID : NIHR200166
Organisme : National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Yorkshire and Humber
ID : NIHR200166
Organisme : National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Yorkshire and Humber
ID : NIHR200166
Organisme : National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Yorkshire and Humber
ID : NIHR200166

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Tierney AL, Charles A, Nelson I. Brain development and the role of experience in the early years. Zero Three [Internet]. 2009 Nov 11 [cited 2023 Mar 10];30(2):9. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC3722610/.
Hurt L, Paranjothy S, Lucas PJ, Watson D, Mann M, Griffiths LJ, et al. Interventions that enhance health services for parents and infants to improve child development and social and emotional well-being in high-income countries: a systematic review. BMJ Open [Internet]. 2018 Feb 1 [cited 2022 Nov 21];8(2):e014899. Available from: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/8/2/e014899 .
Newman L, Judd F, Olsson CA, Castle D, Bousman C, Sheehan P, et al. Early origins of mental disorder - risk factors in the perinatal and infant period. BMC Psychiatry [Internet]. 2016;16(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-0982-7 .
doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0982-7
Barlow J, Coren E. The effectiveness of parenting programs. https://doi.org/101177/1049731517725184 [Internet]. 2017 Sep 22 [cited 2022 Dec 20];28(1):99–102. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1049731517725184 .
Furlong M, McGilloway S, Bywater T, Hutchings J, Smith SM, Donnelly M. Behavioural and cognitive-behavioural group-based parenting programmes for early-onset conduct problems in children aged 3 to 12 years. Campbell Systematic Reviews [Internet]. 2012 Jan 1 [cited 2022 Nov 21];8(1):1–239. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.4073/csr.2012.12 .
Pidano AE, Allen AR. The Incredible Years series: a review of the independent research base. J Child Fam Stud [Internet]. 2015;24(7):1898–916. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-014-9991-7 .
doi: 10.1007/s10826-014-9991-7
Hariton E, Locascio JJ. Randomised controlled trials—the gold standard for effectiveness research. BJOG [Internet]. 2018 Dec 1 [cited 2022 Nov 21];125(13):1716. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC6235704/.
Stewart-Brown S, Anthony R, Wilson L, Winstanley S, Stallard N, Snooks H, et al. Should randomised controlled trials be the “‘gold standard’” for research on preventive interventions for children? J Child Serv. 2011;6(4):228–36.
doi: 10.1108/17466661111190929
Relton C, Torgerson D, O’Cathain A, Nicholl J. Rethinking pragmatic randomised controlled trials: Introducing the “cohort multiple randomised controlled trial” design. BMJ (Online). 2010;340(7753):963–7.
Young-Afat DA, Verkooijen HAM, Van Gils CH, Van Der Velden JM, Burbach JP, Elias SG, et al. Staged-informed consent in the cohort multiple randomized controlled trial design. Epidemiology [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2023 Mar 21];27(3):389–92. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/epidem/Fulltext/2016/05000/Brief_Report__Staged_informed_Consent_in_the.13.aspx .
Kim SY, Flory J, Relton C. Ethics and practice of Trials within Cohorts: An emerging pragmatic trial design. Ethics CLINICAL TRIALS Clinical Trials. 2018;15(1):9–16.
doi: 10.1177/1740774517746620 pubmed: 29224380
Young-Afat DA, Verkooijen HAM, Van Gils CH, Van Der Velden JM, Burbach JP, Elias SG, et al. Staged-informed consent in the cohort multiple randomized controlled trial design. Epidemiology. 2016;27(3):389–92.
doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000435 pubmed: 27035689
Quinn L, Playle R, Drew CJG, Taiyari K, Williams-Thomas R, Muratori LM, et al. Physical activity and exercise outcomes in Huntington’s disease (PACE-HD): results of a 12-month trial-within-cohort feasibility study of a physical activity intervention in people with Huntington’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2022;101:75–89.
doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2022.06.013 pubmed: 35809488
Tomassen ML, Damen PJJ, Verkooijen HM, Peters M, van der Stap J, van Lindert ASR, et al. Feasibility and first results of the ‘Trials-within-Cohorts’ (TwiCs) design in patients undergoing radiotherapy for lung cancer. Acta Oncol (Madr). 2023;62(3):237–44.
doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2023.2183778
Teunissen FR, Willigenburg T, Meijer RP, van Melick HHE, Verkooijen HM, van der Voort van Zyp JRN. The first patient-reported outcomes from the Utrecht Prostate Cohort (UPC): the first platform facilitating ‘trials within cohorts’ (TwiCs) for the evaluation of interventions for prostate cancer. World J Urol. 2022;40(9):2205–12.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04092-2 pubmed: 35861861 pmcid: 9427931
Dickerson J, Bird PK, McEachan RRC, Pickett KE, Waiblinger D, Uphoff E, et al. Born in Bradford’s Better Start: an experimental birth cohort study to evaluate the impact of early life interventions. BMC Public Health [Internet]. 2016 Aug 4 [cited 2021 Mar 19];16(1):711. Available from: http://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-016-3318-0 .
Dickerson J, Bridges S, Willan K, Kelly B, Moss RH, Lister J, et al. Born in Bradford’s Better Start (BiBBS) interventional birth cohort study: Interim cohort profile. Wellcome Open Research 2022 7:244 [Internet]. 2022 Oct 3 [cited 2022 Nov 21];7:244. Available from: https://wellcomeopenresearch.org/articles/7-244 .
Bradford Council. Poverty in Bradford District | Understanding Bradford District [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 Feb 1]. Available from: https://ubd.bradford.gov.uk/about-us/poverty-in-bradford-district/ .
The Incredible Years. Toddler Basic Program | Incredible Years [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2021 Nov 18]. Available from: https://incredibleyears.com/programs/parent/toddler-curriculum/ .
Early Intervention Foundation. Incredible Years Preschool | EIF Guidebook [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2021 Nov 18]. Available from: https://guidebook.eif.org.uk/programme/incredible-years-preschool .
Hutchings J, Griffith N, Bywater T, Williams ME, Hutchings J, Psych D, et al. Evaluating the Incredible Years Toddler Parenting Programme with parents of toddlers in disadvantaged (Flying Start) areas of Wales. Child Care Health Dev [Internet]. 2017 Jan 1 [cited 2022 Nov 23];43(1):104–13. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/cch.12415 .
Perrin EC, Sheldrick RC, McMenamy JM, Henson BS, Carter AS. Improving parenting skills for families of young children in pediatric settings: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr [Internet]. 2014 Jan 1 [cited 2022 Nov 23];168(1):16–24. Available from: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/1766496 .
Furlong M, McGilloway S. Barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based parenting programs in disadvantaged settings: a qualitative study. J Child Fam Stud [Internet]. 2015 Jun 1 [cited 2023 Mar 21];24(6):1809–18. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10826-014-9984-6 .
Berry V, Mitchell SB, Blower S, Whittaker K, Wilkinson K, McGilloway S, et al. Barriers and facilitators in the delivery of a proportionate universal parenting program model (E-SEE Steps) in community family services. PLoS One. 2022;17(6):e0265946. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265946 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265946 pubmed: 35696375 pmcid: 9191704
Bibby AC. A Trial of Intra-Pleural bacteriaL immunoTherapy in Mesothelioma (Tilt): a feasibility study using the trial within a cohort methodology. PQDT - UK & Ireland [Internet]. 2020; Available from: https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/trial-intra-pleural-bacterial-immunotherapy/docview/2508804556/se-2?accountid=13621%0Ahttps://resolver.ebscohost.com/openurl?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/ProQuest+Dissertation .
Couwenberg AM, Burbach JPM, May AM, Berbee M, Intven MPW, Verkooijen HM. The trials within cohorts design facilitated efficient patient enrollment and generalizability in oncology setting. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;120:33–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.015 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.015 pubmed: 31866471
Fibert P, Relton C, Peasgood T, Daley D. Protocol for the STAR (Sheffield Treatments for ADHD) project: an internal pilot study assessing the feasibility of the Trials within Cohorts (TwiCs) design to test the effectiveness of interventions for children with ADHD. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018;4(1):1–9.
doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0250-3
Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ [Internet]. 2013 Jan 9 [cited 2021 Jul 29];346. Available from: https://www.bmj.com/content/346/bmj.e7586 .
Kwakkenbos L, Imran M, Mccall SJ, Mccord KA, Fletcher J, Torgerson D, et al. CONSORT extension for the reporting of randomised controlled trials conducted using cohorts and routinely collected data (CONSORT-ROUTINE): checklist with explanation and elaboration. 2021 [cited 2021 Jul 29];2:28. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n857http://www.bmj.com/.
Thabane L, Lancaster G. A guide to the reporting of protocols of pilot and feasibility trials. Vol. 5. Pilot and Feasibility Studies. BioMed Central Ltd.; 2019.
doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0423-8
Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, Craig P, Baird J, Blazeby JM, et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ [Internet]. 2021 Sep 30 [cited 2023 Feb 27];374. Available from: https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n2061 .
Better Start Bradford Innovation Hub. Incredible Years: Toddler. Research At The Better Start Bradford Innovation Hub [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Nov 6]. Available from: https://bsbinnovationhub.wordpress.com/incredible-years/ .
Torgerson DJ. Contamination in trials: Is cluster randomisation the answer? BMJ. 2001;322(7282):355.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7282.355 pubmed: 11159665 pmcid: 1119583
Kendall S, Nash A, Braun A, Bastug G, Rougeaux E, Bedford H. Acceptability and understanding of the Ages & Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition, as part of the Healthy Child Programme 2-year health and development review in England: Parent and professional perspectives. Child Care Health Dev [Internet]. 2019 Mar 1 [cited 2023 Oct 13];45(2):251–6. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/cch.12639 .
GOV.UK. Changes to the early years foundation stage (EYFS) framework - GOV.UK [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 Nov 17]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/changes-to-the-early-years-foundation-stage-eyfs-framework/changes-to-the-early-years-foundation-stage-eyfs-framework .

Auteurs

Kate E Mooney (KE)

Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK. kate.mooney@york.ac.uk.
Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK. kate.mooney@york.ac.uk.

Charlie Welch (C)

Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.

Kirsty Crossley (K)

Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK.

Tracey Bywater (T)

Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.

John Wright (J)

Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK.

Josie Dickerson (J)

Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK.

Sarah Blower (S)

Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.

Classifications MeSH