Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of modified vaccinia Ankara pre-exposure vaccination against mpox according to previous smallpox vaccine exposure and HIV infection: prospective cohort study.
Cellular response
HIV
Humoral response
MVA-BN
MVA-BN immunogenicity
Orthopox
PLWH
Reactogenicity
Vaccination
Vaccine
mpox
Journal
EClinicalMedicine
ISSN: 2589-5370
Titre abrégé: EClinicalMedicine
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101733727
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2024
Feb 2024
Historique:
received:
05
11
2023
revised:
24
12
2023
accepted:
26
12
2023
medline:
31
1
2024
pubmed:
31
1
2024
entrez:
31
1
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Pre-exposure vaccination with MVA-BN has been widely used against mpox to contain the 2022 outbreak. Many countries have defined prioritized strategies, administering a single dose to those historically vaccinated for smallpox, to achieve quickly adequate coverage in front of low supplies. Using epidemiological models, real-life effectiveness was estimated at approximately 36%-86%, but no clinical trials were performed. Few data on MVA-BN immunogenicity are currently available, and there are no established correlates of protection. Immunological response in PLWH in the context of the 2022 outbreak was also poorly described. Blood samples were collected from participants eligible for pre-exposure MVA-BN vaccination before (T1) receiving a full course of vaccine (single-dose for vaccine-experienced or smallpox-primed and two-dose for smallpox vaccine-naïve or smallpox non-primed) and one month after the last dose (T2 and T3, respectively). MPXV-specific IgGs were measured by in-house immunofluorescence assay, using 1:20 as screening dilution, MPXV-specific nAbs by 50% plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT Among the 164 participants included, 90 (54.8%) were smallpox vaccine-experienced. Median age was 49 years (IQR 41-55). Among the 76 (46%) PLWH, 76% had a CD4 count >500 cells/μL. There was evidence that both the IgG and nAbs titers increased after administration of the MVA-BN vaccine. However, there was no evidence for a difference in the potential mean change in humoral response from baseline to the completion of a full cycle when comparing primed vs. non-primed participants. Similarly, there was no evidence for a difference in the seroconversion rate after full cycle vaccination in the subset of participants not reactive for nAbs at T1 (p = 1.00 by Fisher's exact test). In this same analysis and for the nAbs outcome, there was some evidence of negative effect modification by HIV (interaction p-value = 0.17) as primed people living with HIV (PLWH) showed a lower probability of seroconversion vs. non-primed, and the opposite was seen in PLWoH. When evaluating the response in continuous, we observed an increase in T-cell response after MVA-BN vaccination in both primed and non-primed. There was evidence for a larger increase when using the 2-dose vs. one-dose strategy with a mean difference of -2.01 log The evaluation of the humoral and cellular response one month after the completion of the vaccination cycle suggested that MVA-BN is immunogenic and that the administration of a two-dose schedule is preferable regardless of the previous smallpox vaccination history, especially in PLWH, to maximize nAbs response. MVA-BN was safe as well tolerated, with grade 2 reactogenicity higher after the first administration in vaccine-naïve than in vaccine-experienced individuals, but with no evidence for a difference in the duration of these adverse effects. Further studies are needed to evaluate the long-term duration of immunity and to establish specific correlates of protection. The study was supported by the National Institute for Infectious Disease Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS "Advanced grant 5 × 1000, 2021" and by the Italian Ministry of Health "
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Pre-exposure vaccination with MVA-BN has been widely used against mpox to contain the 2022 outbreak. Many countries have defined prioritized strategies, administering a single dose to those historically vaccinated for smallpox, to achieve quickly adequate coverage in front of low supplies. Using epidemiological models, real-life effectiveness was estimated at approximately 36%-86%, but no clinical trials were performed. Few data on MVA-BN immunogenicity are currently available, and there are no established correlates of protection. Immunological response in PLWH in the context of the 2022 outbreak was also poorly described.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
Blood samples were collected from participants eligible for pre-exposure MVA-BN vaccination before (T1) receiving a full course of vaccine (single-dose for vaccine-experienced or smallpox-primed and two-dose for smallpox vaccine-naïve or smallpox non-primed) and one month after the last dose (T2 and T3, respectively). MPXV-specific IgGs were measured by in-house immunofluorescence assay, using 1:20 as screening dilution, MPXV-specific nAbs by 50% plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT
Findings
UNASSIGNED
Among the 164 participants included, 90 (54.8%) were smallpox vaccine-experienced. Median age was 49 years (IQR 41-55). Among the 76 (46%) PLWH, 76% had a CD4 count >500 cells/μL. There was evidence that both the IgG and nAbs titers increased after administration of the MVA-BN vaccine. However, there was no evidence for a difference in the potential mean change in humoral response from baseline to the completion of a full cycle when comparing primed vs. non-primed participants. Similarly, there was no evidence for a difference in the seroconversion rate after full cycle vaccination in the subset of participants not reactive for nAbs at T1 (p = 1.00 by Fisher's exact test). In this same analysis and for the nAbs outcome, there was some evidence of negative effect modification by HIV (interaction p-value = 0.17) as primed people living with HIV (PLWH) showed a lower probability of seroconversion vs. non-primed, and the opposite was seen in PLWoH. When evaluating the response in continuous, we observed an increase in T-cell response after MVA-BN vaccination in both primed and non-primed. There was evidence for a larger increase when using the 2-dose vs. one-dose strategy with a mean difference of -2.01 log
Interpretation
UNASSIGNED
The evaluation of the humoral and cellular response one month after the completion of the vaccination cycle suggested that MVA-BN is immunogenic and that the administration of a two-dose schedule is preferable regardless of the previous smallpox vaccination history, especially in PLWH, to maximize nAbs response. MVA-BN was safe as well tolerated, with grade 2 reactogenicity higher after the first administration in vaccine-naïve than in vaccine-experienced individuals, but with no evidence for a difference in the duration of these adverse effects. Further studies are needed to evaluate the long-term duration of immunity and to establish specific correlates of protection.
Funding
UNASSIGNED
The study was supported by the National Institute for Infectious Disease Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS "Advanced grant 5 × 1000, 2021" and by the Italian Ministry of Health "
Identifiants
pubmed: 38292040
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102420
pii: S2589-5370(23)00597-7
pmc: PMC10825638
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
102420Investigateurs
Enza Anzalone
(E)
Marta Camici
(M)
Fabio Cannone
(F)
Priscilla Caputi
(P)
Claudia Cimaglia
(C)
Rita Corso
(R)
Flavia Cristofanelli
(F)
Stefania Cruciani
(S)
Nicola De Marco
(N)
Chiara De Ponte
(C)
Giulia Del Duca
(G)
Paolo Faccendini
(P)
Francesca Faraglia
(F)
Augusto Faticoni
(A)
Marisa Fusto
(M)
Saba Gebremeskel
(S)
Maria Letizia Giancola
(ML)
Giuseppina Giannico
(G)
Simona Gili
(S)
Maria Rosaria Iannella
(MR)
Angela Junea
(A)
Alessandra Lamonaca
(A)
Alessandra Marani
(A)
Erminia Masone
(E)
Ilaria Mastrorosa
(I)
Stefania Mazzotta
(S)
Alessandra Nappo
(A)
Giorgia Natalini
(G)
Alfredo Parisi
(A)
Sara Passacantilli
(S)
Jessica Paulicelli
(J)
Maria Maddalena Plazzi
(MM)
Adriano Possi
(A)
Gianni Preziosi
(G)
Silvia Rosati
(S)
Marika Rubino
(M)
Pietro Scanzano
(P)
Laura Scorzolini
(L)
Virginia Tomassi
(V)
Maurizio Vescovo
(M)
Serena Vita
(S)
Luciano Caterini
(L)
Luigi Coppola
(L)
Dimitra Kontogiannis
(D)
Gabriella D'Ettorre
(G)
Marco Ridolfi
(M)
Simona Di Giambenedetto
(S)
Damiano Farinacci
(D)
Alessandra Latini
(A)
Mauro Marchili
(M)
Raffaella Marocco
(R)
Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Author(s).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that no conflicting financial interests or other competing relationships exist.