Changes in the European Union definition for endocrine disruptors: how many molecules remain a cause for concern? The example of crop protection products used in agriculture in France in the six last decades.

crop protection products endocrine disrupting endocrine target organs occupational exposure occupational medicine

Journal

Frontiers in public health
ISSN: 2296-2565
Titre abrégé: Front Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101616579

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 22 11 2023
accepted: 18 12 2023
medline: 31 1 2024
pubmed: 31 1 2024
entrez: 31 1 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The endocrine-disrupting effects of phytopharmaceutical active substances (PAS) on human health are a public health concern. The CIPATOX-PE database, created in 2018, listed the PAS authorized in France between 1961 and 2014 presenting endocrine-disrupting effects for humans according to data from official international organizations. Since the creation of CIPATOX-PE, European regulations have changed, and new initiatives identifying substances with endocrine-disrupting effects have been implemented and new PAS have been licensed. The study aimed to update the CIPATOX-PE database by considering new 2018 European endocrine-disrupting effect identification criteria as well as the new PAS authorized on the market in France since 2015. The endocrine-disrupting effect assessment of PAS from five international governmental and non-governmental initiatives was reviewed, and levels of evidence were retained by these initiatives for eighteen endocrine target organs. The synthesis of the identified endocrine-disrupting effects allowed to assign an endocrine-disrupting effect level of concern for 241 PAS among 980 authorized in France between 1961 and 2021. Thus, according to the updated CIPATOX-PE data, 44 PAS (18.3%) had an endocrine-disrupting effect classified as "high concern," 133 PAS (55.2%) "concern," and 64 PAS (26.6%) "unknown effect" in the current state of knowledge. In the study, 42 PAS with an endocrine-disrupting effect of "high concern" are similarly classified in CIPATOX-PE-2018 and 2021, and 2 new PAS were identified as having an endocrine-disrupting effect of "high concern" in the update, and both were previously classified with an endocrine-disrupting effect of "concern" in CIPATOX-PE-2018. Finally, a PAS was identified as having an endocrine-disrupting effect of "high concern" in CIPATOX-PE-2018 but is now classified as a PAS not investigated for endocrine-disrupting effects in CIPATOX-PE-2021. The endocrine target organs associated with the largest number of PAS with an endocrine-disrupting effect of "high concern" is the reproductive system with 31 PAS. This is followed by the thyroid with 25 PAS and the hypothalamic-pituitary axis (excluding the gonadotropic axis) with 5 PAS. The proposed endocrine-disrupting effect indicator, which is not a regulatory classification, can be used as an epidemiological tool for occupational risks and surveillance.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
The endocrine-disrupting effects of phytopharmaceutical active substances (PAS) on human health are a public health concern. The CIPATOX-PE database, created in 2018, listed the PAS authorized in France between 1961 and 2014 presenting endocrine-disrupting effects for humans according to data from official international organizations. Since the creation of CIPATOX-PE, European regulations have changed, and new initiatives identifying substances with endocrine-disrupting effects have been implemented and new PAS have been licensed.
Objectives UNASSIGNED
The study aimed to update the CIPATOX-PE database by considering new 2018 European endocrine-disrupting effect identification criteria as well as the new PAS authorized on the market in France since 2015.
Methods UNASSIGNED
The endocrine-disrupting effect assessment of PAS from five international governmental and non-governmental initiatives was reviewed, and levels of evidence were retained by these initiatives for eighteen endocrine target organs.
Results UNASSIGNED
The synthesis of the identified endocrine-disrupting effects allowed to assign an endocrine-disrupting effect level of concern for 241 PAS among 980 authorized in France between 1961 and 2021. Thus, according to the updated CIPATOX-PE data, 44 PAS (18.3%) had an endocrine-disrupting effect classified as "high concern," 133 PAS (55.2%) "concern," and 64 PAS (26.6%) "unknown effect" in the current state of knowledge. In the study, 42 PAS with an endocrine-disrupting effect of "high concern" are similarly classified in CIPATOX-PE-2018 and 2021, and 2 new PAS were identified as having an endocrine-disrupting effect of "high concern" in the update, and both were previously classified with an endocrine-disrupting effect of "concern" in CIPATOX-PE-2018. Finally, a PAS was identified as having an endocrine-disrupting effect of "high concern" in CIPATOX-PE-2018 but is now classified as a PAS not investigated for endocrine-disrupting effects in CIPATOX-PE-2021. The endocrine target organs associated with the largest number of PAS with an endocrine-disrupting effect of "high concern" is the reproductive system with 31 PAS. This is followed by the thyroid with 25 PAS and the hypothalamic-pituitary axis (excluding the gonadotropic axis) with 5 PAS.
Discussion UNASSIGNED
The proposed endocrine-disrupting effect indicator, which is not a regulatory classification, can be used as an epidemiological tool for occupational risks and surveillance.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38292391
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1343047
pmc: PMC10826603
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1343047

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Roger, Paul, Fort, Lamouroux, Samal, Spinosi and Charbotel.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Auteurs

Cloé Roger (C)

University Lyon, Umrestte UMR T 9405 (University Claude Bernard Lyon 1 and Gustave Eiffel), Lyon, France.

Adèle Paul (A)

University Lyon, Umrestte UMR T 9405 (University Claude Bernard Lyon 1 and Gustave Eiffel), Lyon, France.

Emmanuel Fort (E)

University Lyon, Umrestte UMR T 9405 (University Claude Bernard Lyon 1 and Gustave Eiffel), Lyon, France.

Céline Lamouroux (C)

University Lyon, Umrestte UMR T 9405 (University Claude Bernard Lyon 1 and Gustave Eiffel), Lyon, France.
CRPPE de Lyon, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Lyon, France.

Areejit Samal (A)

The Institute of Mathematical Sciences, A CI of Homi Bhabha National Institute, Chennai, India.

Johan Spinosi (J)

Santé Publique France, French National Public Health Agency, Paris, France.

Barbara Charbotel (B)

University Lyon, Umrestte UMR T 9405 (University Claude Bernard Lyon 1 and Gustave Eiffel), Lyon, France.
CRPPE de Lyon, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Lyon, France.

Classifications MeSH