Therapeutic role of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Endometrial Neoplasms Lymph Nodes Lymphatic Metastasis Retroperitoneal Neoplasms

Journal

International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society
ISSN: 1525-1438
Titre abrégé: Int J Gynecol Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9111626

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
31 Jan 2024
Historique:
medline: 1 2 2024
pubmed: 1 2 2024
entrez: 31 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Lymph nodal involvement is a prognostic factor in endometrial cancer. The added value of para-aortic lymphadenectomy compared with pelvic nodal evaluation alone remains a matter of debate in the management of patients with intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the prognostic value of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in terms of overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer. The study adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from January 2000 to April 2023. Studies on intermediate- and high-risk patients who underwent pelvic versus pelvic and para-aortic dissection were included in the analysis. The Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies (MINORS) and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool (QUADAS-2) were used for quality assessment of the selected articles. Fourteen studies were identified, encompassing 9415 patients with a median age of 62 years (IQR 56.5-66.5). The majority had International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I-II disease (76%) and endometrioid histology (89%). The 72% of patients who underwent only pelvic nodal evaluation and the 87% who underwent pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy received adjuvant treatment (p=0.44). Pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy was associated with a significant improvement in 5-year overall survival (RR=0.71, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.88, p<0.01), translating to a 41% reduction in the risk of overall death. However, no significant differences were observed in the 5-year risk of recurrence (RR=1.12, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.34, p=0.15). Additionally, patients undergoing pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy experienced a 26% increased risk of post-operative complications (RR=1.26, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.53, p=0.03) and prolonged operative times (MD=56.27, 95% CI 15.94 to 96.60, p<0.01). Pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy appears to confer a prognostic benefit in patients with intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer. Robust prospective studies are needed to further validate these findings and elucidate the precise role of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the optimal management of these patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38296516
pii: ijgc-2023-005134
doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-005134
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© IGCS and ESGO 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Matteo Pavone (M)

IHU Strasbourg, Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, Strasbourg, France.
Dipartimento di Scienze per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.

Floriane Jochum (F)

Department of Gynecology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.

Lise Lecointre (L)

IHU Strasbourg, Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, Strasbourg, France.
Department of Gynecology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.

Francesco Fanfani (F)

Dipartimento di Scienze per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.

Giovanni Scambia (G)

Dipartimento di Scienze per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.

Denis Querleu (D)

IHU Strasbourg, Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, Strasbourg, France denis.querleu@esgo.org.
Dipartimento di Scienze per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.

Chérif Akladios (C)

Department of Gynecology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.

Classifications MeSH