3D bioprinting of microorganisms: principles and applications.
3D bioprinting
Bioink
Bioprocess
Crosslinking
Hydrogel scaffolds
Microorganisms
Journal
Bioprocess and biosystems engineering
ISSN: 1615-7605
Titre abrégé: Bioprocess Biosyst Eng
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101088505
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 Jan 2024
31 Jan 2024
Historique:
received:
20
10
2023
accepted:
24
12
2023
medline:
1
2
2024
pubmed:
1
2
2024
entrez:
31
1
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
In recent years, the ability to create intricate, live tissues and organs has been made possible thanks to three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting. Although tissue engineering has received a lot of attention, there is growing interest in the use of 3D bioprinting for microorganisms. Microorganisms like bacteria, fungi, and algae, are essential to many industrial bioprocesses, such as bioremediation as well as the manufacture of chemicals, biomaterials, and pharmaceuticals. This review covers current developments in 3D bioprinting methods for microorganisms. We go over the bioink compositions designed to promote microbial viability and growth, taking into account factors like nutrient delivery, oxygen supply, and waste elimination. Additionally, we investigate the most important bioprinting techniques, including extrusion-based, inkjet, and laser-assisted approaches, as well as their suitability with various kinds of microorganisms. We also investigate the possible applications of 3D bioprinted microbes. These range from constructing synthetic microbial consortia for improved metabolic pathway combinations to designing spatially patterned microbial communities for enhanced bioremediation and bioprocessing. We also look at the potential for 3D bioprinting to advance microbial research, including the creation of defined microenvironments to observe microbial behavior. In conclusion, the 3D bioprinting of microorganisms marks a paradigm leap in microbial bioprocess engineering and has the potential to transform many application areas. The ability to design the spatial arrangement of various microorganisms in functional structures offers unprecedented possibilities and ultimately will drive innovation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38296889
doi: 10.1007/s00449-023-02965-3
pii: 10.1007/s00449-023-02965-3
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Moroni L, Boland T, Burdick JA et al (2018) Biofabrication: a guide to technology and terminology. Trends Biotechnol 36:384–402
pubmed: 29137814
doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.10.015
Murphy SV, Atala A (2014) 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol 32:773–785
pubmed: 25093879
doi: 10.1038/nbt.2958
Knowlton S, Onal S, Yu CH et al (2015) Bioprinting for cancer research. Trends Biotechnol 33:504–513
pubmed: 26216543
doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.06.007
Peng W, Datta P, Ayan B et al (2017) 3D bioprinting for drug discovery and development in pharmaceutics. Acta Biomater 57:26–46
pubmed: 28501712
doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.05.025
Dubbin K, Dong Z, Park DM et al (2021) Projection microstereolithographic microbial bioprinting for engineered biofilms. Nano Lett 21:1352–1359
pubmed: 33508203
doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04100
Liu Y, Xia X, Liu Z, Dong M (2023) The next frontier of 3D bioprinting: bioactive materials functionalized by bacteria. Small 19:2205949. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202205949
doi: 10.1002/smll.202205949
González LM, Mukhitov N, Voigt CA (2020) Resilient living materials built by printing bacterial spores. Nat Chem Biol 16:126–133
pubmed: 31792444
doi: 10.1038/s41589-019-0412-5
Mohammadi Z, Rabbani M (2018) Bacterial bioprinting on a flexible substrate for fabrication of a colorimetric temperature indicator by using a commercial inkjet printer. J Med Sign Sens 8:170
doi: 10.4103/jmss.JMSS_41_17
Usai F, Loi G, Scocozza F et al (2023) Design and biofabrication of bacterial living materials with robust and multiplexed biosensing capabilities. Mater Today Bio 18:100526
pubmed: 36632629
doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100526
Majerle A, Schmieden DT, Jerala R, Meyer AS (2019) Synthetic biology for multiscale designed biomimetic assemblies: from designed self-assembling biopolymers to bacterial bioprinting. Biochemistry 58:2095–2104
pubmed: 30957491
doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.8b00922
Qian F, Zhu C, Knipe JM et al (2019) Direct writing of tunable living inks for bioprocess intensification. Nano Lett 19:5829–5835
pubmed: 30702295
doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b00066
Cheptsov V, Zhigarkov V, Maximova I et al (2023) Laser-assisted bioprinting of microorganisms with hydrogel microdroplets: peculiarities of Ascomycota and Basidiomycota yeast transfer. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 39:29
doi: 10.1007/s11274-022-03478-z
Kačarević ŽP, Rider PM, Alkildani S et al (2018) An introduction to 3D bioprinting: possibilities, challenges and future aspects. Materials 11:2199
pubmed: 30404222
pmcid: 6266989
doi: 10.3390/ma11112199
Jakab K, Damon B, Neagu A et al (2006) Three-dimensional tissue constructs built by bioprinting. Biorheology 43:509–513
pubmed: 16912422
Chang R, Nam J, Sun W (2008) Effects of dispensing pressure and nozzle diameter on cell survival from solid freeform fabrication–based direct cell writing. Tissue Eng Part A 14:41–48
pubmed: 18333803
doi: 10.1089/ten.a.2007.0004
Pati F, Jang J, Lee JW, Cho D-W (2015) Extrusion bioprinting. Essentials of 3D biofabrication and translation. Elsevier, pp 123–152
doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800972-7.00007-4
Hinton TJ, Jallerat Q, Palchesko RN et al (2015) Three-dimensional printing of complex biological structures by freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels. Sci Adv 1:e1500758
pubmed: 26601312
pmcid: 4646826
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1500758
Chen DX, Chen DX (2019) Extrusion bioprinting of scaffolds. Springer
doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-03460-3
Jiang T, Munguia-Lopez JG, Flores-Torres S et al (2019) Extrusion bioprinting of soft materials: an emerging technique for biological model fabrication. Appl Phys Rev 6:011310
doi: 10.1063/1.5059393
Ovsianikov A, Gruene M, Pflaum M et al (2010) Laser printing of cells into 3D scaffolds. Biofabrication 2:014104
pubmed: 20811119
doi: 10.1088/1758-5082/2/1/014104
Chen Y, Xiong X, Liu X et al (2020) 3D Bioprinting of shear-thinning hybrid bioinks with excellent bioactivity derived from gellan/alginate and thixotropic magnesium phosphate-based gels. J Mater Chem B 8:5500–5514
pubmed: 32484194
doi: 10.1039/D0TB00060D
Loebel C, Rodell CB, Chen MH, Burdick JA (2017) Shear-thinning and self-healing hydrogels as injectable therapeutics and for 3D-printing. Nat Protoc 12:1521–1541. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2017.053
doi: 10.1038/nprot.2017.053
pubmed: 28683063
pmcid: 7546336
Paxton N, Smolan W, Böck T et al (2017) Proposal to assess printability of bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting and evaluation of rheological properties governing bioprintability. Biofabrication 9:044107
pubmed: 28930091
doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/aa8dd8
Chand R, Muhire BS, Vijayavenkataraman S (2022) Computational fluid dynamics assessment of the effect of bioprinting parameters in extrusion bioprinting. Int J Bioprint 8(2):545. https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v8i2.545
doi: 10.18063/ijb.v8i2.545
pubmed: 35669321
pmcid: 9159488
Pardo L, Wilson WC, Boland T (2003) Characterization of patterned self-assembled monolayers and protein arrays generated by the ink-jet method. Langmuir 19:1462–1466
doi: 10.1021/la026171u
Xu T, Kincaid H, Atala A, Yoo JJ (2008) High-throughput production of single-cell microparticles using an inkjet printing technology. J Manuf Sci Eng 130(2):021017. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2903064
doi: 10.1115/1.2903064
Choudhury D, Anand S, Naing MW (2018) The arrival of commercial bioprinters–towards 3D bioprinting revolution! Int J Bioprint 4:139
pubmed: 33102917
pmcid: 7582003
doi: 10.18063/ijb.v4i2.139
Calvert P (2001) Inkjet printing for materials and devices. Chem Mater 13:3299–3305
doi: 10.1021/cm0101632
Xu T, Jin J, Gregory C et al (2005) Inkjet printing of viable mammalian cells. Biomaterials 26:93–99
pubmed: 15193884
doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.04.011
Cui X, Dean D, Ruggeri ZM, Boland T (2010) Cell damage evaluation of thermal inkjet printed Chinese hamster ovary cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 106:963–969
pubmed: 20589673
doi: 10.1002/bit.22762
Okamoto T, Suzuki T, Yamamoto N (2000) Microarray fabrication with covalent attachment of DNA using bubble jet technology. Nat Biotechnol 18:438–441
pubmed: 10748527
doi: 10.1038/74507
Cui X, Breitenkamp K, Finn M et al (2012) Direct human cartilage repair using three-dimensional bioprinting technology. Tissue Eng Part A 18:1304–1312
pubmed: 22394017
pmcid: 3360507
doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2011.0543
Ng WL, Huang X, Shkolnikov V et al (2022) Controlling droplet impact velocity and droplet volume: key factors to achieving high cell viability in sub-nanoliter droplet-based bioprinting. Int J Bioprint 8(1):424. https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v8i1.424
doi: 10.18063/ijb.v8i1.424
pubmed: 35187273
Ng WL, Huang X, Shkolnikov V et al (2023) Polyvinylpyrrolidone-based bioink: influence of bioink properties on printing performance and cell proliferation during inkjet-based bioprinting. Bio-des Manuf 6:676–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-023-00245-3
doi: 10.1007/s42242-023-00245-3
Tekin E, Smith PJ, Schubert US (2008) Inkjet printing as a deposition and patterning tool for polymers and inorganic particles. Soft Matter 4:703–713
pubmed: 32907172
doi: 10.1039/b711984d
Demirci U, Montesano G (2007) Single cell epitaxy by acoustic picolitre droplets. Lab Chip 7:1139–1145
pubmed: 17713612
doi: 10.1039/b704965j
Wijshoff H (2010) The dynamics of the piezo inkjet printhead operation. Phys Rep 491:77–177
doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2010.03.003
Nakamura M, Kobayashi A, Takagi F et al (2005) Biocompatible inkjet printing technique for designed seeding of individual living cells. Tissue Eng 11:1658–1666
pubmed: 16411811
doi: 10.1089/ten.2005.11.1658
Li W, Wang M, Ma H et al (2023) Stereolithography apparatus and digital light processing-based 3D bioprinting for tissue fabrication. Iscience. 26:106039
pubmed: 36761021
pmcid: 9906021
doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106039
Raman R, Bashir R (2015) Stereolithographic 3D bioprinting for biomedical applications. Essentials of 3D biofabrication and translation. Elsevier, pp 89–121
doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800972-7.00006-2
Wang Z, Abdulla R, Parker B et al (2015) A simple and high-resolution stereolithography-based 3D bioprinting system using visible light crosslinkable bioinks. Biofabrication 7:045009
pubmed: 26696527
doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/7/4/045009
Ng WL, Lee JM, Zhou M, Chen YW, Lee KA, Yeong WY, Shen YF (2020) Vat polymerization-based bioprinting-process, materials, applications and regulatory challenges. Biofabrication 12(2):022001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab6034
doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab6034
pubmed: 31822648
Raman R, Bhaduri B, Mir M et al (2016) High-resolution projection microstereolithography for patterning of neovasculature. Adv Healthc Mater 5:610–619
pubmed: 26696464
doi: 10.1002/adhm.201500721
Zheng X, Lee H, Weisgraber TH et al (2014) Ultralight, ultrastiff mechanical metamaterials. Science 344:1373–1377
pubmed: 24948733
doi: 10.1126/science.1252291
Serra P, Piqué A (2019) Laser-induced forward transfer: fundamentals and applications. Adv Mater Technol 4:1800099
doi: 10.1002/admt.201800099
Bohandy J, Kim B, Adrian F (1986) Metal deposition from a supported metal film using an excimer laser. J Appl Phys 60:1538–1539
doi: 10.1063/1.337287
Catros S, Desbat B, Pippenger B et al (2011) Laser-assisted bioprinting for creating on-demand patterns of human osteoprogenitor cells and nano-hydroxyapatite. Biofabrication 3:025001
pubmed: 21527813
doi: 10.1088/1758-5082/3/2/025001
Koch L, Kuhn S, Sorg H et al (2010) Laser printing of skin cells and human stem cells. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 16:847–854
pubmed: 19883209
doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2009.0397
Kryou C, Leva V, Chatzipetrou M, Zergioti I (2019) Bioprinting for liver transplantation. Bioengineering 6:95
pubmed: 31658719
pmcid: 6956058
doi: 10.3390/bioengineering6040095
Leva V, Chatzipetrou M, Alexopoulos L et al (2018) Direct laser printing of liver cells on porous collagen scaffolds. J Laser Micro Nanoeng 13:234–237
Ringeisen BR, Rincon K, Fitzgerald LA et al (2015) Printing soil: a single-step, high-throughput method to isolate micro-organisms and near-neighbour microbial consortia from a complex environmental sample. Methods Ecol Evol 6:209–217
doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12303
Taidi B, Lebernede G, Koch L et al (2016) Colony development of laser printed eukaryotic (yeast and microalga) microorganisms in co-culture. Int J Bioprint 2:37–43
doi: 10.18063/IJB.2016.02.001
Delaporte P, Alloncle A-P (2016) Laser-induced forward transfer: a high resolution additive manufacturing technology. Opt Laser Technol 78:33–41
doi: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2015.09.022
Guillemot F, Souquet A, Catros S, Guillotin B (2010) Laser-assisted cell printing: principle, physical parameters versus cell fate and perspectives in tissue engineering. Nanomedicine 5:507–515
pubmed: 20394540
doi: 10.2217/nnm.10.14
Guillotin B, Souquet A, Catros S et al (2010) Laser assisted bioprinting of engineered tissue with high cell density and microscale organization. Biomaterials 31:7250–7256
pubmed: 20580082
doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.05.055
Cheptsov V, Churbanova E, Yusupov V et al (2018) Laser printing of microbial systems: effect of absorbing metal film. Lett Appl Microbiol 67:544–549
pubmed: 30223313
doi: 10.1111/lam.13074
Cheptsov V, Tsypina S, Minaev N et al (2019) New microorganism isolation techniques with emphasis on laser printing. Int J Bioprint 5:165
pubmed: 32596530
doi: 10.18063/ijb.v5i1.165
Lin Y, Huang Y, Chrisey DB (2011) Metallic foil-assisted laser cell printing. J Biomech Eng 10(1115/1):4003132. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4003132
doi: 10.1115/1.4003132
Jones N (2012) Science in three dimensions: the print revolution. Nature 487:22–23
pubmed: 22763531
doi: 10.1038/487022a
Gao Q, He Y, Fu J et al (2015) Coaxial nozzle-assisted 3D bioprinting with built-in microchannels for nutrients delivery. Biomaterials 61:203–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.031
doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.031
pubmed: 26004235
Lozano R, Stevens L, Thompson BC et al (2015) 3D printing of layered brain-like structures using peptide modified gellan gum substrates. Biomaterials 67:264–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.07.022
doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.07.022
pubmed: 26231917
Neufurth M, Wang X, Schröder HC et al (2014) Engineering a morphogenetically active hydrogel for bioprinting of bioartificial tissue derived from human osteoblast-like SaOS-2 cells. Biomaterials 35:8810–8819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.07.002
doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.07.002
pubmed: 25047630
Park JY, Choi J-C, Shim J-H et al (2014) A comparative study on collagen type I and hyaluronic acid dependent cell behavior for osteochondral tissue bioprinting. Biofabrication 6:035004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/6/3/035004
doi: 10.1088/1758-5082/6/3/035004
pubmed: 24758832
Rutz AL, Gargus ES, Hyland KE et al (2019) Employing PEG crosslinkers to optimize cell viability in gel phase bioinks and tailor post printing mechanical properties. Acta Biomater 99:121–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.09.007
doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.09.007
pubmed: 31539655
Zhang Y, Yu Y, Akkouch A et al (2015) In vitro study of directly bioprinted perfusable vasculature conduits. Biomater Sci 3:134–143. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4BM00234B
doi: 10.1039/C4BM00234B
pubmed: 25574378
Gao G, Schilling AF, Yonezawa T et al (2014) Bioactive nanoparticles stimulate bone tissue formation in bioprinted three-dimensional scaffold and human mesenchymal stem cells. Biotechnol J 9:1304–1311. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201400305
doi: 10.1002/biot.201400305
pubmed: 25130390
Kim JD, Choi JS, Kim BS et al (2010) Piezoelectric inkjet printing of polymers: stem cell patterning on polymer substrates. Polymer 51:2147–2154
doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.03.038
Xu C, Zhang M, Huang Y et al (2014) Study of droplet formation process during drop-on-demand inkjetting of living cell-laden bioink. Langmuir 30:9130–9138. https://doi.org/10.1021/la501430x
doi: 10.1021/la501430x
pubmed: 25005170
Xu T, Binder KW, Albanna MZ et al (2012) Hybrid printing of mechanically and biologically improved constructs for cartilage tissue engineering applications. Biofabrication 5:015001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/5/1/015001
doi: 10.1088/1758-5082/5/1/015001
pubmed: 23172542
Shopperly LK, Spinnen J, Krüger J et al (2022) Blends of gelatin and hyaluronic acid stratified by stereolithographic bioprinting approximate cartilaginous matrix gradients. J Biomed Mater Res 110:2310–2322. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.35079
doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.35079
Koch L, Deiwick A, Schlie S et al (2012) Skin tissue generation by laser cell printing. Biotechnol Bioeng 109:1855–1863. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.24455
doi: 10.1002/bit.24455
pubmed: 22328297
Michael S, Sorg H, Peck C-T et al (2013) Tissue engineered skin substitutes created by laser-assisted bioprinting form skin-like structures in the dorsal skin fold chamber in mice. PLoS One 8:e57741. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057741
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057741
pubmed: 23469227
pmcid: 3587634
Wang LL, Highley CB, Yeh Y et al (2018) Three-dimensional extrusion bioprinting of single- and double-network hydrogels containing dynamic covalent crosslinks. J Biomed Mater Res 106:865–875. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36323
doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.36323
Schwab A, Levato R, D’Este M et al (2020) Printability and shape fidelity of bioinks in 3D bioprinting. Chem Rev 120:11028–11055. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00084
doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00084
pubmed: 32856892
Chung JHY, Naficy S, Yue Z et al (2013) Bio-ink properties and printability for extrusion printing living cells. Biomater Sci 1:763. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3bm00012e
doi: 10.1039/c3bm00012e
pubmed: 32481829
Khoeini R, Nosrati H, Akbarzadeh A et al (2021) Natural and synthetic bioinks for 3D bioprinting. Adv NanoBio Res 1:2000097. https://doi.org/10.1002/anbr.202000097
doi: 10.1002/anbr.202000097
Hennink WE, van Nostrum CF (2002) Novel crosslinking methods to design hydrogels. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 64:223–236
doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.009
Hu W, Wang Z, Xiao Y et al (2019) Advances in crosslinking strategies of biomedical hydrogels. Biomater Sci 7:843–855. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8BM01246F
doi: 10.1039/C8BM01246F
pubmed: 30648168
Gungor-Ozkerim PS, Inci I, Zhang YS et al (2018) Bioinks for 3D bioprinting: an overview. Biomater Sci 6:915–946. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7BM00765E
doi: 10.1039/C7BM00765E
pubmed: 29492503
pmcid: 6439477
Zhang T, Zhao W, Xiahou Z et al (2021) Bioink design for extrusion-based bioprinting. Appl Mater Today 25:101227
doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2021.101227
Klak M, Kosowska K, Bryniarski T et al (2022) Bioink based on the dECM for 3D bioprinting of bionic tissue, the first results obtained on murine model. Bioprinting. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2022.e00233
doi: 10.1016/j.bprint.2022.e00233
Stanton MM, Samitier J, Sánchez S (2015) Bioprinting of 3D hydrogels. Lab Chip 15:3111–3115. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5LC90069G
doi: 10.1039/C5LC90069G
pubmed: 26066320
Hospodiuk M, Dey M, Sosnoski D, Ozbolat IT (2017) The bioink: a comprehensive review on bioprintable materials. Biotechnol Adv 35:217–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.12.006
doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.12.006
pubmed: 28057483
GhavamiNejad A, Ashammakhi N, Wu XY, Khademhosseini A (2020) Crosslinking strategies for 3D bioprinting of polymeric hydrogels. Small 16:2002931. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202002931
doi: 10.1002/smll.202002931
Bruchet M, Melman A (2015) Fabrication of patterned calcium cross-linked alginate hydrogel films and coatings through reductive cation exchange. Carbohyd Polym 131:57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.05.021
doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.05.021
Madl CM, Heilshorn SC (2019) Rapid Diels-Alder cross-linking of cell encapsulating hydrogels. Chem Mater 31:8035–8043. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b02485
doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b02485
pubmed: 32410775
pmcid: 7224313
Song P, Wang H (2020) High-performance polymeric materials through hydrogen-bond cross-linking. Adv Mater 32:1901244. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201901244
doi: 10.1002/adma.201901244
Shadhar MH, Mohammed MM, Abdullah MH et al (2023) Self-healing of concrete using bacteria: investigation of the impact of the process’s conditions. Innov Infrastruct Solut. 8:115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-023-01079-9
doi: 10.1007/s41062-023-01079-9
Shiwarski DJ, Hudson AR, Tashman JW, Feinberg AW (2021) Emergence of FRESH 3D printing as a platform for advanced tissue biofabrication. APL Bioeng 5(1):010904. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0032777
doi: 10.1063/5.0032777
pubmed: 33644626
pmcid: 7889293
Watari S, Inaba H, Tamura T et al (2022) Light-induced stabilization of microtubules by photo-crosslinking of a Tau-derived peptide. Chem Commun 58:9190–9193. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2CC01890J
doi: 10.1039/D2CC01890J
Wippel HH, Chavez JD, Tang X, Bruce JE (2022) Quantitative interactome analysis with chemical cross-linking and mass spectrometry. Curr Opin Chem Biol 66:102076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2021.06.011
doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2021.06.011
pubmed: 34393043
Westhaus E, Messersmith PB (2001) Triggered release of calcium from lipid vesicles: a bioinspired strategy for rapid gelation of polysaccharide and protein hydrogels. Biomaterials 22:453–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00200-3
doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00200-3
pubmed: 11214756
Sarker Md, Izadifar M, Schreyer D, Chen X (2018) Influence of ionic crosslinkers (Ca
doi: 10.1080/09205063.2018.1433420
pubmed: 29376775
Gao G, Kim BS, Jang J, Cho D-W (2019) Recent strategies in extrusion-based three-dimensional cell printing toward organ biofabrication. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 5:1150–1169. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00691
doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00691
pubmed: 33405637
Moreira Teixeira LS, Feijen J, Van Blitterswijk CA et al (2012) Enzyme-catalyzed crosslinkable hydrogels: emerging strategies for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 33:1281–1290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.067
doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.067
Wei M, Inoue T, Hsu Y-I et al (2022) Preparation of pH-responsive poly(γ-glutamic acid) hydrogels by enzymatic cross-linking. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 8:551–559. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c01378
doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c01378
pubmed: 35103468
Sun N, Sun P, Wu A et al (2018) Facile fabrication of thermo/redox responsive hydrogels based on a dual crosslinked matrix for a smart on–off switch. Soft Matter 14:4327–4334. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8SM00504D
doi: 10.1039/C8SM00504D
pubmed: 29761197
Fairbanks BD, Schwartz MP, Bowman CN, Anseth KS (2009) Photoinitiated polymerization of PEG-diacrylate with lithium phenyl-2,4,6-trimethylbenzoylphosphinate: polymerization rate and cytocompatibility. Biomaterials 30:6702–6707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.08.055
doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.08.055
pubmed: 19783300
pmcid: 2896013
Na K, Shin S, Lee H et al (2018) Effect of solution viscosity on retardation of cell sedimentation in DLP 3D printing of gelatin methacrylate/silk fibroin bioink. J Ind Eng Chem 61:340–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.12.032
doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2017.12.032
Wu D, Yu Y, Tan J et al (2018) 3D bioprinting of gellan gum and poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate based hydrogels to produce human-scale constructs with high-fidelity. Mater Des 160:486–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.09.040
doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.09.040
Ouyang L, Highley CB, Sun W, Burdick JA (2017) A Generalizable strategy for the 3D bioprinting of Hydrogels from nonviscous photo-crosslinkable inks. Adv Mater 29:1604983. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201604983
doi: 10.1002/adma.201604983
Yu B, Zheng J, Wu J et al (2022) Preparation of isotropic tensile photosensitive resins for digital light processing 3D printing using orthogonal thiol-ene and thiol-epoxy dual-cured strategies. Polym Testing 116:107767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107767
doi: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107767
De Grave L, Di Meo C, Greant C et al (2023) Photo-crosslinkable poly (aspartic acid) for light-based additive manufacturing: chain-growth versus step-growth crosslinking. Eur Polymer J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.112017
doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.112017
Briou B, Améduri B, Boutevin B (2021) Trends in the Diels-Alder reaction in polymer chemistry. Chem Soc Rev 50:11055–11097. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CS01382J
doi: 10.1039/D0CS01382J
pubmed: 34605835
Loebel C, Broguiere N, Alini M et al (2015) Microfabrication of photo-cross-linked hyaluronan hydrogels by single- and two-photon tyramine oxidation. Biomacromol 16:2624–2630. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00363
doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00363
Fei S-T, Phelps MVB, Wang Y et al (2006) A redox responsive polymeric gel based on ionic crosslinking. Soft Matter 2:397. https://doi.org/10.1039/b516972k
doi: 10.1039/b516972k
pubmed: 32680253
Roh H-H, Kim H-S, Kim C, Lee K-Y (2021) 3D printing of polysaccharide-based self-healing hydrogel reinforced with alginate for secondary cross-linking. Biomedicines 9:1224. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9091224
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9091224
pubmed: 34572410
pmcid: 8471923
Seto A, Gatt CJ, Dunn MG (2009) Improved tendon radioprotection by combined cross-linking and free radical scavenging. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:2994–3001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0934-3
doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0934-3
pubmed: 19543778
pmcid: 2758987
Collins MN, Birkinshaw C (2007) Comparison of the effectiveness of four different crosslinking agents with hyaluronic acid hydrogel films for tissue-culture applications. J Appl Polym Sci 104:3183–3191. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.25993
doi: 10.1002/app.25993
Ma T, Gao X, Dong H et al (2017) High-throughput generation of hyaluronic acid microgels via microfluidics-assisted enzymatic crosslinking and/or Diels-Alder click chemistry for cell encapsulation and delivery. Appl Mater Today 9:49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2017.01.007
doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2017.01.007
Awadhiya A, Kumar D, Verma V (2016) Crosslinking of agarose bioplastic using citric acid. Carbohyd Polym 151:60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.05.040
doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.05.040
Willson K, Atala A, Yoo JJ (2021) Bioprinting Au natural: the biologics of bioinks. Biomolecules 11:1593. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11111593
doi: 10.3390/biom11111593
pubmed: 34827591
pmcid: 8615908
Connell JL, Ritschdorff ET, Whiteley M, Shear JB (2013) 3D printing of microscopic bacterial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:18380–18385. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1309729110
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1309729110
pubmed: 24101503
pmcid: 3832025
Lehner BAE, Schmieden DT, Meyer AS (2017) A straightforward approach for 3D bacterial printing. ACS Synth Biol 6:1124–1130. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.6b00395
doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.6b00395
pubmed: 28225616
pmcid: 5525104
Balasubramanian S, Aubin-Tam M-E, Meyer AS (2019) 3D printing for the fabrication of biofilm-based functional living materials. ACS Synth Biol 8:1564–1567. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.9b00192
doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.9b00192
pubmed: 31319670
Schmieden DT, Basalo Vázquez SJ, Sangüesa H et al (2018) Printing of patterned, engineered E. coli Biofilms with a low-cost 3D printer. ACS Synth Biol 7:1328–1337. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.7b00424
doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.7b00424
pubmed: 29690761
Demain AL (2000) Microbial biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol 18:26–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7799(99)01400-6
doi: 10.1016/S0167-7799(99)01400-6
pubmed: 10631778
Schaffner M, Rühs PA, Coulter F et al (2017) 3D printing of bacteria into functional complex materials. Sci Adv 3:eaao6804. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aao6804
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aao6804
pubmed: 29214219
pmcid: 5711516
Liu X, Yuk H, Lin S et al (2018) 3D printing of living responsive materials and devices. Adv Mater 30:1704821. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201704821
doi: 10.1002/adma.201704821
McBee RM, Lucht M, Mukhitov N et al (2022) Engineering living and regenerative fungal–bacterial biocomposite structures. Nat Mater 21:471–478. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-021-01123-y
doi: 10.1038/s41563-021-01123-y
pubmed: 34857911
Mittermeier F, Bäumler M, Arulrajah P et al (2023) Artificial microbial consortia for bioproduction processes. Eng Life Sci 23:e2100152. https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.202100152
doi: 10.1002/elsc.202100152
pubmed: 36619879
Johnston TG, Yuan S-F, Wagner JM et al (2020) Compartmentalized microbes and co-cultures in hydrogels for on-demand bioproduction and preservation. Nat Commun 11:563. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14371-4
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14371-4
pubmed: 32019917
pmcid: 7000784
Cui Z, Feng Y, Liu F et al (2022) 3D bioprinting of living materials for structure-dependent production of hyaluronic acid. ACS Macro Lett 11:452–459. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmacrolett.2c00037
doi: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.2c00037
pubmed: 35575323
Reinhardt O, Ihmann S, Ahlhelm M, Gelinsky M (2023) 3D bioprinting of mineralizing cyanobacteria as novel approach for the fabrication of living building materials. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 11:1145177. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1145177
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1145177
pubmed: 37077229
pmcid: 10106584
Rahman AM, Bhardwaj A, Pei Z et al (2022) The 3D printing of biomass-fungi composites: effects of waiting time after mixture preparation on mechanical properties, rheological properties, minimum extrusion pressure, and print quality of the prepared mixture. J Compos Sci 6:237. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs6080237
doi: 10.3390/jcs6080237
Bhardwaj A, Rahman AM, Wei X et al (2021) 3D printing of biomass-fungi composite material: effects of mixture composition on print quality. JMMP 5:112. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp5040112
doi: 10.3390/jmmp5040112
Prosser JI, Bohannan BJM, Curtis TP et al (2007) The role of ecological theory in microbial ecology. Nat Rev Microbiol 5:384–392. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1643
doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1643
pubmed: 17435792
Costerton JW, Lewandowski Z, Caldwell DE et al (1995) Microbial biofilms. Annu Rev Microbiol 49:711–745. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.mi.49.100195.003431
doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.49.100195.003431
pubmed: 8561477
Hall-Stoodley L, Costerton JW, Stoodley P (2004) Bacterial biofilms: from the Natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat Rev Microbiol 2:95–108. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro821
doi: 10.1038/nrmicro821
pubmed: 15040259
Branda SS, Vik Å, Friedman L, Kolter R (2005) Biofilms: the matrix revisited. Trends Microbiol 13:20–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2004.11.006
doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2004.11.006
pubmed: 15639628
Flemming H-C, Wingender J (2010) The biofilm matrix. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:623–633. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2415
doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2415
pubmed: 20676145
Douglas S, Beveridge TJ (1998) Mineral formation by bacteria in natural microbial communities. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 26:79–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.1998.tb00494.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.1998.tb00494.x
Bazylinski DA, Frankel RB (2004) Magnetosome formation in prokaryotes. Nat Rev Microbiol 2:217–230. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro842
doi: 10.1038/nrmicro842
pubmed: 15083157
Rehm BHA (2010) Bacterial polymers: biosynthesis, modifications and applications. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:578–592. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2354
doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2354
pubmed: 20581859
Bhuwal AK, Singh G, Aggarwal NK et al (2013) Isolation and screening of polyhydroxyalkanoates producing bacteria from pulp, paper, and cardboard industry wastes. Int J Biomater 2013:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/752821
doi: 10.1155/2013/752821
Lu Q, Zhou J, Zhu G et al (2022) Anoxic/oxic treatment without biomass recycle. Sci Total Environ 834:155166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155166
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155166
pubmed: 35413348
Wu Y, Liu J, Rene ER (2018) Periphytic biofilms: a promising nutrient utilization regulator in wetlands. Biores Technol 248:44–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.081
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.081
Rühs PA, Böni L, Fuller GG et al (2013) In-situ quantification of the interfacial rheological response of bacterial biofilms to environmental stimuli. PLoS One 8:e78524. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078524
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078524
pubmed: 24244319
pmcid: 3823922
Vlamakis H, Chai Y, Beauregard P et al (2013) Sticking together: building a biofilm the Bacillus subtilis way. Nat Rev Microbiol 11:157–168. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2960
doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2960
pubmed: 23353768
pmcid: 3936787
Klaus-Joerger T, Joerger R, Olsson E, Granqvist C (2001) Bacteria as workers in the living factory: metal-accumulating bacteria and their potential for materials science. Trends Biotechnol 19:15–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-7799(00)01514-6
doi: 10.1016/s0167-7799(00)01514-6
pubmed: 11146098
Napoli F, Olivieri G, Russo ME et al (2010) Butanol production by Clostridium acetobutylicum in a continuous packed bed reactor. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 37:603–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-010-0707-8
doi: 10.1007/s10295-010-0707-8
pubmed: 20349108
Bäckdahl H, Helenius G, Bodin A et al (2006) Mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose and interactions with smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials 27:2141–2149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.026
doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.026
pubmed: 16310848
Brown RM, Willison JH, Richardson CL (1976) Cellulose biosynthesis in Acetobacter xylinum: visualization of the site of synthesis and direct measurement of the in vivo process. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 73:4565–4569. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.73.12.4565
doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.12.4565
pubmed: 1070005
pmcid: 431544
Schmeckebier A, Zayed A, Ulber R (2022) Productive biofilms: from prokaryotic to eukaryotic systems. J Chem Tech Biotech 97:3049–3064. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.7208
doi: 10.1002/jctb.7208
Zhang H, Bruns MA, Logan BE (2006) Biological hydrogen production by Clostridium acetobutylicum in an unsaturated flow reactor. Water Res 40:728–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.11.041
doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.11.041
pubmed: 16427113
Tay PKR, Manjula-Basavanna A, Joshi NS (2018) Repurposing bacterial extracellular matrix for selective and differential abstraction of rare earth elements. Green Chem 20:3512–3520. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8GC01355A
doi: 10.1039/C8GC01355A
Rodrigo-Navarro A, Sankaran S, Dalby MJ et al (2021) Engineered living biomaterials. Nat Rev Mater 6:1175–1190. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-021-00350-8
doi: 10.1038/s41578-021-00350-8
Szarlej P, Carayon I, Gnatowski P et al (2021) Composite polyurethane-polylactide (PUR/PLA) flexible filaments for 3d fused filament fabrication (FFF) of antibacterial wound dressings for skin regeneration. Materials 14:6054. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14206054
doi: 10.3390/ma14206054
pubmed: 34683646
pmcid: 8538761
Bottan S, Robotti F, Jayathissa P et al (2015) Surface-structured bacterial cellulose with guided assembly-based biolithography (GAB). ACS Nano 9:206–219. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn5036125
doi: 10.1021/nn5036125
pubmed: 25525956
Kowalska-Ludwicka K, Cala J, Grobelski B et al (2013) New methods Modified bacterial cellulose tubes for regeneration of damaged peripheral nerves. Arch Med Sci 3:527–534. https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2013.33433
doi: 10.5114/aoms.2013.33433
Krishna Kumar R, Foster KR (2023) 3D printing of microbial communities: A new platform for understanding and engineering microbiomes. Microb Biotechnol 16:489–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.14168
doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.14168
pubmed: 36511313