Standing middle cerebral artery velocity predicts cognitive function and gait speed in older adults with cognitive impairment, and is impacted by sex differences.
Cerebral perfusion
Montreal cognitive assessment
Pulsatility index
Sex differences
Supine to stand
Transcranial doppler
Journal
Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior
ISSN: 2666-2450
Titre abrégé: Cereb Circ Cogn Behav
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101774849
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
received:
25
10
2023
revised:
08
12
2023
accepted:
23
12
2023
medline:
1
2
2024
pubmed:
1
2
2024
entrez:
1
2
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Upright posture challenges the cerebrovascular system, leading to changes in middle cerebral artery velocity (MCAv) dynamics which are less evident at supine rest. Chronic alterations in MCAv have been linked to hypoperfusion states and the effect that this may have on cognition remains unclear. This study aimed to determine if MCAv and oscillatory metrics of MCAv (ex. pulsatility index, PI) during upright posture are i) associated with cognitive function and gait speed (GS) to a greater extent than during supine rest, and ii) are different between sexes. Beat-by-beat MCAv (transcranial Doppler ultrasound) and mean arterial pressure (MAP, plethysmography) were averaged for 30-seconds during supine-rest through a transition to standing for 53 participants (73±6yrs, 17 females). While controlling for age, multiple linear regressions predicting MoCA scores and GS from age, supine MCAv metrics, and standing MCAv metrics, were completed. Simple linear regressions predicting Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score and GS from MCAv metrics were performed separately for females and males. Significance was set to
Identifiants
pubmed: 38298456
doi: 10.1016/j.cccb.2023.100198
pii: S2666-2450(23)00042-9
pmc: PMC10827680
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100198Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Author(s).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.