Value of chemical shift imaging in the evaluation of neural foramen stenosis.

Background

Chemical shift Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is often routinely acquired to assess a spectrum of spinal lesions due to its ability versatility to obtain rapid sequences at the expense of spatial resolution images. It is one of the quickest sequences to acquire at the expense of spatial resolution.

Objective

In this study we assess the diagnostic efficacy of Chemical shift Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of Neural Foraminal stenosis.

Materials and methods

Conventional T2, T1 and STIR sagittal and axial images as well as 'in' and 'out' phase chemical shift sagittal MRI sequences of 25 consecutive patients presenting with back pain and radiculopathy were reviewed. The degree of neural stenosis in the lumbar spine foramina on both sides was graded using the Lee classification on T2 and 'in' and 'out' phase MRI sequences by two independent MSK radiologists. Statistical analysis was performed using paired T-Test and Cohen's weighted kappa test was applied as a measure of agreement between the two observed raters.

Results

A total of 250 lumbar neural foramina were assessed. There was substantial agreement (Cohen's weighted kappa) for both raters between 'in' and 'out' phase chemical shift sagittal MRI sequences (rater 1 = 0.699, rater 2 = 0.718), as well as good agreement between raters for both 'in' and 'out' phase chemical shift sagittal MRI sequences (in phase = 0.656, 'out' phase = 0.576). However, when compared to the gold standard rating on a T2 based sequence, ratings on in' and 'out' phase MRI sequences overestimated the degree of stenosis. When comparing 'in' and 'out' ratings to the T2 ratings, agreement was poor with kappa ranging from 0.132 to 0.202.

Conclusion

Though both 'in' and 'out' phase chemical shift sagittal MRI sequences can be used to analyse neural foraminal stenosis, given its propensity to over-estimate the degree of stenosis in comparison to the T2 based images, assessment of the condition on these complementary limited sequences technique should be avoided/should be undertaken with caution.

Informations de copyright

© 2024 Delhi Orthopedic Association. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: RB is on editorial board of JCOT