The new robotic system HUGO RAS for gynecologic surgery: First European experience from Gemelli Hospital.
HUGO RAS
colposacropexy
gynecologic surgery
hysterectomy
robotic-assisted surgery
robotics
Journal
International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics
ISSN: 1879-3479
Titre abrégé: Int J Gynaecol Obstet
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0210174
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Feb 2024
01 Feb 2024
Historique:
revised:
11
01
2024
received:
06
06
2023
accepted:
13
01
2024
medline:
1
2
2024
pubmed:
1
2
2024
entrez:
1
2
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
To evaluate the safety and feasibility of the new surgical robot HUGO robotic assisted surgery (RAS) in a series of gynecologic surgical procedures. Between March and October 2022, 138 patients treated at Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy were enrolled in the study. All patients suitable for a minimally-invasive approach were prospectively included and divided into two groups: Group 1 (78 patients) made up of patients operated on for uterine and/or adnexal pathologies, and Group 2 (60 patients) made up of patients treated for pelvic organ prolapse. In Group 1, median docking time (DT) was 5 min and median console time (CT) was 90 min. In two patients (2.6%) redocking was necessary. In two patients (2.6%), the surgeon continued the surgery laparoscopically. Intraoperative complications occurred in two surgeries (2.6%). In Group 2, median DT was 4 min and median CT was 134.5 min. In three patients (5%), redocking was necessary. In all patients, the surgery was successfully completed robotically without intraoperative complications. The present study demonstrates that the new HUGO RAS system for gynecologic surgery is safe with good results in terms of surgical efficacy and perioperative outcomes. Further studies are needed to investigate its use in other technical and surgical aspects.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Références
Turner LC, Shepherd JP, Wang L, Bunker CH, Lowder JL. Hysterectomy surgery trends: a more accurate depiction of the last decade? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208(4):277.
Muaddi H, Hafid ME, Choi W, et al. Clinical outcomes of robotic surgery compared to conventional surgical approaches (laparoscopic or open): a systematic overview of reviews. Ann Surg. 2021;273(3):467-473.
Gressel GM, Potts JR 3rd, Cha S, Valea FA, Banks E. Hysterectomy route and numbers reported by graduating residents in obstetrics and gynecology training programs. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(2):268-273.
Gueli Alletti S, Chiantera V, Arcuri G, et al. Introducing the new surgical robot HUGO™ RAS: system description and docking settings for gynecological surgery. Front Oncol. 2022;9(12):898060.
Ragavan N, Bharathkumar S, Chirravur P, Sankaran S, Mottrie A. Evaluation of HUGO RAS system in major urologic surgery: our initial experience. J Endourol. 2022;36(8):1029-1035. doi:10.1089/end.2022.0015
Bravi CA, Paciotti M, Sarchi L, et al. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with the novel HUGO robotic system: initial experience and optimal surgical set-up at a tertiary referral robotic center. Eur Urol. 2022;82(2):233-237.
Totaro A, Campetella M, Bientinesi R, et al. The new surgical robotic platform HUGO™ RAS: system description and docking settings for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Urologia. 2022;89(4):603-609.
Ragavan N, Bharathkumar S, Chirravur P, Sankaran S. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy utilizing HUGO RAS platform: initial experience. J Endourol. 2022;37:147-150.
Monterossi G, Pedone Anchora L, Gueli Alletti S, Fagotti A, Fanfani F, Scambia G. The first European gynaecological procedure with the new surgical robot HUGO™ RAS. A total hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy in a woman affected by BRCA-1 mutation. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2022;14(1):91-94.
Giovanni P, Giuseppe C, Daniela C, et al. HUGO RAS system in urogynecology: the first nerve sparing sacral colpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2023;15(1):83-87.
Campagna G, Panico G, Vacca L, et al. Robotic sacrocolpopexy plus ventral rectopexy as combined treatment for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse using the new HUGO RAS system. Tech Coloproctol. 2023;27:499-500. doi:10.1007/s10151-023-02768-4
Kung FT, Chang SY. The relationship between ultrasonic volume and actual weight of pathologic uterus. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 1996;42(1):35-38.
Harb TS, Adam RA. Predicting uterine weight before hysterectomy: ultrasound measurements versus clinical assessment. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(6):2122-2125.
Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):187-196.
Albright BB, Witte T, Tofte AN, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23(1):18-27.
Buchs NC, Pugin F, Volonté F, Morel P. Reliability of robotic system during general surgical procedures in a university hospital. Am J Surg. 2014;207(1):84-88.