Point-of-Care Coating of Revision Femoral Stems With Antibiotic-Loaded Calcium Sulfate: Reduction in Infection After 2nd Stage Reimplantation but Not With Aseptic Revisions.
Antibiotic coating
Calcium sulfate
Point of care
Revision
Total hip arthroplasty
Journal
Arthroplasty today
ISSN: 2352-3441
Titre abrégé: Arthroplast Today
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101681808
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2024
Feb 2024
Historique:
received:
18
01
2023
revised:
24
08
2023
accepted:
04
11
2023
medline:
2
2
2024
pubmed:
2
2
2024
entrez:
2
2
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Infection rates in revision total hip arthroplasty are lower when antibiotic loaded cemented stems are utilized. Inspired by this technique, a point-of-care coating of antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate (CaSO One hundred eleven consecutive femoral stems were coated. Just prior to insertion, 10 cc of CaSO In the study cohort of 111 patients, there were 69 aseptic revisions with one periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) (1.4%) and 42 second-stage reimplantations with 2 PJIs (4.8%). In the control cohort of 104 patients, there were 74 aseptic revisions with one PJI (1.4%) and 30 second-stage reimplantations with 7 PJIs (23.3%). There was no significant reduction in PJI rate in the aseptic revision subgroup (1.4% study vs 1.4% control group), Point-of-care antibiotic coating of cementless revision femoral stems reduces PJI infection rate in 2nd stage reimplantations only. We theorize that microbes persist in the endosteal cortices after resection and may contribute to infection recurrence.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Infection rates in revision total hip arthroplasty are lower when antibiotic loaded cemented stems are utilized. Inspired by this technique, a point-of-care coating of antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate (CaSO
Methods
UNASSIGNED
One hundred eleven consecutive femoral stems were coated. Just prior to insertion, 10 cc of CaSO
Results
UNASSIGNED
In the study cohort of 111 patients, there were 69 aseptic revisions with one periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) (1.4%) and 42 second-stage reimplantations with 2 PJIs (4.8%). In the control cohort of 104 patients, there were 74 aseptic revisions with one PJI (1.4%) and 30 second-stage reimplantations with 7 PJIs (23.3%). There was no significant reduction in PJI rate in the aseptic revision subgroup (1.4% study vs 1.4% control group),
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
Point-of-care antibiotic coating of cementless revision femoral stems reduces PJI infection rate in 2nd stage reimplantations only. We theorize that microbes persist in the endosteal cortices after resection and may contribute to infection recurrence.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38304243
doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101302
pii: S2352-3441(23)00207-8
pmc: PMC10830497
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
101302Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors.