Trends in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty among 138 international experienced arthroplasty knee surgeons.

Indications Knee osteoarthritis Survey UKA Unicompartmental knee replacement

Journal

Heliyon
ISSN: 2405-8440
Titre abrégé: Heliyon
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101672560

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 21 04 2023
revised: 05 01 2024
accepted: 05 01 2024
medline: 2 2 2024
pubmed: 2 2 2024
entrez: 2 2 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an established option for treating isolated unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis (OA), but controversies still exist about patient selection, indications, perioperative management and alignment goals. This survey was designed to understand the current trends of experienced arthroplasty knee surgeons performing UKA. An online questionnaire was created with SurveyMonkey A total of 138 ESSKA members from 34 different countries completed the survey. A total of 81 % of the responders performed fewer than 50 UKAs per year; 53 % of UKAs represented less than 20 % of their knee replacements; 71 % used mainly or only fixed-bearing implants; 81 % performed UKA in a shorter time compared to TKA; and 61 % and 72 % were interested in custom-made UKA and robotics, respectively. Thirty-six percent considered a minimum postoperative alignment of 0° for medial UKA, and 32 % considered 10° as the maximum valgus deformity for lateral UKA. Fifty-five percent had no minimum age cut-off, 47 % had no BMI cut-off, and 57 % believed TKA was better than UKA in knees with concomitant high-grade patellofemoral OA. Approximately 50 % of the surgeons desired a coronal alignment that was the same as the predegeneration alignment. A high level of agreement was reached regarding the following: preference for fixed-bearing UKAs, lower surgical time for UKA compared to TKA, interest in custom-made and robotic UKAs, no age and weight cut-off, TKA preferred in the presence of patellofemoral OA, and a final alignment goal of the predegenerative state both for medial and lateral. There was no agreement regarding length of stay, rehabilitation protocol, preoperative varus and valgus cut-off values, and treatment in cases of absence of anterior cruciate ligament or previous osteotomy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38304773
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24307
pii: S2405-8440(24)00338-4
pmc: PMC10830546
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e24307

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper..

Auteurs

Matteo Marullo (M)

IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy.

Reha N Tandogan (RN)

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Emsey Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Halic University Istanbul & Cankaya Orthopedics, Ankara, Turkey.

Nanne Kort (N)

CortoClinics, Nederweert, Netherlands.

Amit Meena (A)

Gelenkpunkt - Sports and Joint Surgery, FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Innsbruck, Austria.

Manish Attri (M)

Central Institute of Orthopaedics, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Bruce Gomberg (B)

Northern Light Mercy Orthopaedics, Portland, ME, USA.

Riccardo D'Ambrosi (R)

IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy.
Università Degli Studi di Milano, Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per La Salute, Milan, Italy.

Classifications MeSH