Ceragenin-coated endotracheal tubes for the reduction of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a prospective, longitudinal, cross-over, interrupted time, implementation study protocol (CEASE VAP study).

Adult intensive & critical care Infection control Respiratory infections

Journal

BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Feb 2024
Historique:
medline: 4 2 2024
pubmed: 4 2 2024
entrez: 3 2 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Critically ill patients are at high risk of acquiring ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), which occurs in approximately 20% of mechanically ventilated patients. VAP results either from aspiration of pathogen-contaminated oropharyngeal secretions or contaminated biofilms that form on endotracheal tubes (ETTs) after intubation. VAP results in increased duration of mechanical ventilation, increased intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, increased risk of death and increased healthcare costs. Because of its impact on patient outcomes and the healthcare system, VAP is regarded as an important patient safety issue and there is an urgent need for better evidence on the efficacy of prevention strategies. Modified ETTs that reduce aspiration of oropharyngeal secretions with subglottic secretion drainage or reduce the occurrence of biofilm with a coating of ceragenins (CSAs) are available for clinical use in Canada. In this implementation study, we will evaluate the efficacy of these two types of Health Canada-licensed ETTs on the occurrence of VAP, and impact on patient-centred outcomes. In this ongoing, pragmatic, prospective, longitudinal, interrupted time, cross-over implementation study, we will compare the efficacy of a CSA-coated ETT (CeraShield N8 Pharma) with an ETT with subglottic secretion drainage (Taper Guard, Covidien). The study periods consist of four alternating time periods of 11 or 12 weeks or a total of 23 weeks for each ETT. All patients intubated with the study ETT in each time period will be included in an intention-to-treat analysis. Outcomes will include VAP incidence, mortality and health services utilisation including antibiotic use and length of stay. This study has been approved by the Health Sciences Research Ethics Board at Queen's University. The results of this study will be actively disseminated through manuscript publication and conference presentations. NCT05761613.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Critically ill patients are at high risk of acquiring ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), which occurs in approximately 20% of mechanically ventilated patients. VAP results either from aspiration of pathogen-contaminated oropharyngeal secretions or contaminated biofilms that form on endotracheal tubes (ETTs) after intubation. VAP results in increased duration of mechanical ventilation, increased intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, increased risk of death and increased healthcare costs. Because of its impact on patient outcomes and the healthcare system, VAP is regarded as an important patient safety issue and there is an urgent need for better evidence on the efficacy of prevention strategies. Modified ETTs that reduce aspiration of oropharyngeal secretions with subglottic secretion drainage or reduce the occurrence of biofilm with a coating of ceragenins (CSAs) are available for clinical use in Canada. In this implementation study, we will evaluate the efficacy of these two types of Health Canada-licensed ETTs on the occurrence of VAP, and impact on patient-centred outcomes.
METHODS METHODS
In this ongoing, pragmatic, prospective, longitudinal, interrupted time, cross-over implementation study, we will compare the efficacy of a CSA-coated ETT (CeraShield N8 Pharma) with an ETT with subglottic secretion drainage (Taper Guard, Covidien). The study periods consist of four alternating time periods of 11 or 12 weeks or a total of 23 weeks for each ETT. All patients intubated with the study ETT in each time period will be included in an intention-to-treat analysis. Outcomes will include VAP incidence, mortality and health services utilisation including antibiotic use and length of stay.
ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION BACKGROUND
This study has been approved by the Health Sciences Research Ethics Board at Queen's University. The results of this study will be actively disseminated through manuscript publication and conference presentations.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER BACKGROUND
NCT05761613.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38309761
pii: bmjopen-2023-076720
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076720
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05761613']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e076720

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Nicola E Symonds (NE)

Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Eric X M Meng (EXM)

Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

John Gordon Boyd (JG)

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Tracy Boyd (T)

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Andrew Day (A)

Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Hailey Hobbs (H)

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

David M Maslove (DM)

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Patrick A Norman (PA)

Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Joanna S Semrau (JS)

School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Stephanie Sibley (S)

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

John Muscedere (J)

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada john.muscedere@kingstonhsc.ca.

Classifications MeSH