Impact of different reconstruction algorithms and setting parameters on radiomics features of PSMA PET images: A preliminary study.

NEMA Image Quality Phantom PSMA PET Imaging Prostate Cancer Radiomics Features Reconstruction Algorithms

Journal

European journal of radiology
ISSN: 1872-7727
Titre abrégé: Eur J Radiol
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8106411

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 11 10 2023
revised: 09 01 2024
accepted: 25 01 2024
medline: 5 2 2024
pubmed: 5 2 2024
entrez: 4 2 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Radiomics analysis of oncologic positron emission tomography (PET) images is an area of significant activity and potential. The reproducibility of radiomics features is an important consideration for routine clinical use. This preliminary study investigates the robustness of radiomics features in PSMA-PET images across penalized-likelihood (Q.Clear) and standard ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) reconstruction algorithms and their setting parameters in phantom and prostate cancer (PCa) patients. A NEMA image quality (IQ) phantom and 8 PCa patients were selected for phantom and patient analyses, respectively. PET images were reconstructed using Q.Clear (reconstruction β-value: 100-700, at intervals of 100 for both NEMA IQ phantom and patients) and OSEM (duration: 15sec, 30sec, 1 min, 2 min, 3 min, 4 min and 5 min for NEMA phantom and duration: 30 s, 1 min and 2 min for patients) reconstruction methods. Subsequently, 129 radiomic features were extracted from the reconstructed images. The coefficient of variation (COV) of each feature across reconstruction methods and their parameters was calculated to determine feature robustness. The extracted radiomics features showed a different range of variability, depending on the reconstruction algorithms and setting parameters. Specifically, 23.0 % and 53.5 % of features were found as robust against β-value variations in Q.Clear and different durations in OSEM reconstruction algorithms, respectively. Taking into account the two algorithms and their parameters, eleven features (8.5 %) showed COV ≤ 5 % and eighteen (14 %) showed 5 %<COV ≤ 10 %, independent of changes in the methods and parameters. Forty-two (32.5 %) were found with 10 %<COV ≤ 20 %. The remaining fifty-eight features (45 %) showed high variability with COV > 20 %. The mean COVs of the extracted radiomics features were significantly different between the two reconstruction methods (p < 0.05) except for the phantom morphological features. All radiomics features were affected by reconstruction methods and parameters, but features with small or very small variations are considered better candidates for reproducible quantification of either tumor or metastatic tissues in clinical trials. There is a need for standardization before the implementation of PET radiomics in clinical practice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38310673
pii: S0720-048X(24)00065-2
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111349
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

111349

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Masoomeh Fooladi (M)

Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Yunus Soleymani (Y)

Department of Neuroscience and Addiction Studies, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Arman Rahmim (A)

Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Departments of Radiology and Physics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Saeed Farzanefar (S)

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Farahnaz Aghahosseini (F)

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Negisa Seyyedi (N)

Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Health Management Research Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Peyman Sh Zadeh (P)

Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Electronic address: sheikhzadeh-p@sina.tums.ac.ir.

Classifications MeSH