Comparable Efficacy of Oral Bendamustine versus Intravenous Administration in Treating Hematologic Malignancies.

Bendamustine acute lymphoblastic leukemia lymphoma multiple myeloma pharmacokinetics

Journal

Research square
Titre abrégé: Res Sq
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101768035

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Jan 2024
Historique:
pubmed: 5 2 2024
medline: 5 2 2024
entrez: 5 2 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The purpose of this study was to analyze potential differences in antitumor efficacy and pharmacokinetics between intravenous (IV) bendamustine (BEN) and a novel orally administered bendamustine agent (PO) that is utilizing the beneficial properties of superstaturated solid dispersions formulated in nanoparticles. Pharmacokinetics of IV versus PO BEN were determined by analysis of plasma samples collected from NSG mice treated with either IV or PO BEN. Plasma samples were analyzed using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) following a liquid-liquid extraction to determine peak BEN concentration (Cmax), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and the half-life (t1/2) Bendamustine at a high dose The novel oral BEN agent tested exhibits good oral bioavailability and systemic exposure for

Identifiants

pubmed: 38313301
doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3848777/v1
pmc: PMC10836110
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Preprint

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA023074
Pays : United States

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

CONFLICT OF INTEREST The authors MJC, LD, APM, DWD, MH, RJS, and EK declare no conflicts of interest regarding authorship or publication of this work.

Auteurs

Megan J Cracchiolo (MJ)

University of Arizona.

Lisa Davis (L)

University of Arizona.

Andrew P Matiatos (AP)

University of Arizona.

Dan W Davini (DW)

University of Arizona.

Muhammad Husnain (M)

University of Arizona.

Richard J Simpson (RJ)

University of Arizona.

Emmanuel Katsanis (E)

University of Arizona.

Classifications MeSH