A new reliable device to assess trunk extensors strength.


Journal

Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics
ISSN: 1509-409X
Titre abrégé: Acta Bioeng Biomech
Pays: Poland
ID NLM: 101194794

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
medline: 1 1 2022
pubmed: 1 1 2022
entrez: 5 2 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This study aimed to examine the reliability of trunk extensor strength assessment with a functional electromechanical dynamometer (FEMD). Thirty-one men performed strength assessment at different velocities (V) (V1 = 0.15 m⋅s-1 , V2 = 0.30 m⋅s-1,V3 = 0.45 m⋅s-1) and range of movement (R) (R1 = 25% cm; R2 = 50% cm), and isometric contraction at 90°. Reliability was obtained through the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), typical error (TE), and coefficient of variation (CV). The absolute reliability provided stable repeatability of the average eccentric strength in the V1R1 condition (CV = 9.52%) and the maximum eccentric strength in V1R1 (CV = 9.63%) and V2R2 (CV = 9.66%). The relative reliability of the trunk extensor's average strength was good (ICC = 0.77-0.83) for concentric and good (ICC = 0.78-0.85) and moderate (ICC = 0.67-0.74) for eccentric contraction. Also, good (ICC = 0.77-0.81) and moderate (ICC = 0.55-0.74) reliability of the maximum strength were obtained for concentric and eccentric contraction. The most reliable manifestation to evaluate the concentric (CV = 11.33%) and eccentric (CV = 9.52%) strength was the average strength in the V1R1 condition and the maximum strength (CV = 10.29%) to isometric assessment. The average concentric strength in the V2R2 condition (r = 0.69) and the maximum eccentric strength in the V1R1 condition (r = 0.65) were the best related to the maximum isometric strength. FEMD is a highly reliable device to evaluate trunk extensors strength.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38314488
pii: 101194794

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

49-57

Auteurs

Waleska Reyes-Ferrada (W)

Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences Laboratory, School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile.

Luis Chirosa-Ríos (L)

Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

Ignacio Chirosa-Ríos (I)

Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

Darío Martínez-García (D)

Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences Laboratory, School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile.

Paola Barboza-Gonzalez (P)

Department of Sports Sciences and Physical Conditioning, Faculty of Education, Universidad Católica de La Santísima Concepción, Concepción, Chile.

David Ulloa-Díaz (D)

Department of Sports Sciences and Physical Conditioning, Faculty of Education, Universidad Católica de La Santísima Concepción, Concepción, Chile.

Daniel Jerez-Mayorga (D)

Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences Laboratory, School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile.

Ángela Rodríguez-Perea (Á)

Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

Classifications MeSH