Assessing the Landscape in Medical Education Literature in Medical Oncology: A Scoping Review.


Journal

JCO oncology practice
ISSN: 2688-1535
Titre abrégé: JCO Oncol Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101758685

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Feb 2024
Historique:
medline: 5 2 2024
pubmed: 5 2 2024
entrez: 5 2 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Medical oncology and medical education (ME) have both expanded exponentially over the past 50 years; thus, it is important to understand the current status of postgraduate medical oncology education and develop ways to advance this field. This study undertakes a scoping review of ME literature in medical oncology to inform future scholarship in this area. MEDLINE, Embase, ERIC, and Web of Science were searched to find peer-reviewed English language articles on postgraduate ME in medical oncology published from 2009 to 2020. Established scoping review methodologies were used in study design; articles were classified by specialty, learner training level, region of authorship, institution type, year of publication, journal type, study methodology, and research topic. Curriculum intervention, scholarship, and domain(s) of physician competency were also assessed. The results were interpreted using descriptive statistics and collated using predetermined conceptual frameworks. A total of 2,959 references were initially found across four databases. After title and abstract screening, 305 articles remained; after full-text review, 144 articles were included in final analysis. Postgraduate medical oncology education research is increasing, with the majority of articles published in North America. Quantitative studies were most common, primarily survey approaches. For physician competencies, professionalism and medical expertise comprised the large majority of article focuses, whereas very few articles addressed leadership or health advocacy. Curriculum development, professional development, and communication skills were dominant research themes while no articles discussed teacher training. Although areas such as professionalism and communication skills are well-studied, medical oncology ME research is lacking in leadership, health advocacy, and teacher training. This study provides valuable guidance for future ME research in medical oncology and establishes a benchmark to examine changes in educational scholarship over time.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38315938
doi: 10.1200/OP.23.00711
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

OP2300711

Auteurs

Ruijia Jin (R)

Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Sean Addison (S)

Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Victoria, BC, Canada.

Vanessa Kitchin (V)

University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Daniel W Golden (DW)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Chicago, Faculty of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
University of Chicago Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center at Silver Cross Hospital, New Lenox, IL.

Vincent Tam (V)

Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Department of Medical Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Paris-Ann Ingledew (PA)

Department of Surgery, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of British Columbia, Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Classifications MeSH