A genomic biomarker for the rapid identification of the rob(1;29) translocation in beef cattle breeds.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Feb 2024
05 Feb 2024
Historique:
received:
19
09
2023
accepted:
30
01
2024
medline:
6
2
2024
pubmed:
6
2
2024
entrez:
5
2
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Robertsonian translocations, specifically rob(1;29) translocation, have reportedly been the most prevalent chromosomal abnormalities in cattle, affecting various breeds and leading to a decrease in fertility and reproductive value. Currently, the identification of rob(1;29) carriers relies on cytogenetic analysis that has limitations in terms of accessibility, cost, and sample requirements. To address these limitations, a novel genomic biomarker was developed in this study for the rapid and precise identification of rob(1;29) carriers. Using q-PCR, a specific copy number variation associated with translocation was targeted, which effectively distinguished between wild-type, homozygous and heterozygous carriers. Crucially, the biomarker can be applied to DNA extracted from various biological matrices, such as semen, embryos, oocytes, milk, saliva, coat, and muscle, and it is compatible with fresh, refrigerated, or frozen samples. Furthermore, this approach offers significant reductions in cost compared to those associated with traditional cytogenetic analysis and provides results within a short turnaround time. The successful development of this genomic biomarker has considerable potential for widespread adoption in screening programs. It facilitates timely identification and management of rob(1;29) carriers while mitigating economic losses and preserving genetic integrity in bovine populations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38316831
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53232-8
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-53232-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2951Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Gustavsson, I. & Rockborn, G. Chromosome abnormality in three cases of lymphatic leukaemia in cattle. Nature 203, 990. https://doi.org/10.1038/203990a0 (1964).
doi: 10.1038/203990a0
pubmed: 14203527
Popescu, C. P. & Pech, A. Une bibliographie sur la translocation 1/29 de bovins dans le monde (1964–1990). Ann Zootech 40, 271–305 (1991).
doi: 10.1051/animres:19910405
Gustavsson, I. Cytogenetics, distribution and phenotypic effects of a translocation in Swedish cattle. Hereditas 63, 68–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.1969.tb02259.x (1969).
doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1969.tb02259.x
pubmed: 5399228
Gustavsson, I. Distribution of the 1/29 translocation in the A.I. Bull population of Swedish Red and White cattle. Hereditas 69, 101–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.1971.tb02422.x (1971).
doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1971.tb02422.x
pubmed: 5173414
Dyrendahl, I. & Gustavsson, I. Sexual functions, semen characteristics and fertility of bulls carrying the 1/29 chromosome translocation. Hereditas 90, 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.1979.tb01315.x (1979).
doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1979.tb01315.x
pubmed: 437991
Schmutz, S. M., Moker, J. S., Barth, A. D. & Mapletoft, R. J. Embryonic loss in superovulated cattle caused by the 1;29 Robertsonian translocation. Theriogenology 35, 705–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691x(91)90411-6 (1991).
doi: 10.1016/0093-691x(91)90411-6
pubmed: 16726939
Lonergan, P., Kommisrud, E., Andresen, O., Refsdal, A. O. & Farstad, W. Use of semen from a bull heterozygous for the 1 29 translocation in an IVF program. Theriogenology 41, 1379–1384. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691x(94)90189-p (1994).
doi: 10.1016/0093-691x(94)90189-p
pubmed: 16727492
Rodero-Serrano, E., Demyda-Peyrás, S., González-Martinez, A., Rodero-Franganillo, A. & Moreno-Millán, M.,. The rob(1;29) chromosome translocation in endangered Andalusian cattle breeds. Livestock Sci. 1, 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2013.10.001 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2013.10.001
Bonnet-Garnier, A. et al. Sperm nuclei analysis of 1/29 Robertsonian translocation carrier bulls using fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 112, 241–247. https://doi.org/10.1159/000089877 (2006).
doi: 10.1159/000089877
pubmed: 16484779
Bonnet-Garnier, A. et al. Meiotic segregation analysis in cows carrying the t(1;29) Robertsonian translocation. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 120, 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1159/000118744 (2008).
doi: 10.1159/000118744
pubmed: 18467829
Iannuzzi, A. et al. Frequency and distribution of rob(1;29) in eight Portuguese cattle breeds. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 120, 147–149. https://doi.org/10.1159/000118755 (2008).
doi: 10.1159/000118755
pubmed: 18467840
Iannuzzi, A., Parma, P. & Iannuzzi, L. Chromosome abnormalities and fertility in domestic bovids: A review. Anim. Open Access J. MDPI 11, 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030802 (2021).
doi: 10.3390/ani11030802
Jimenez, J. M., Morales, R., Molina, A., Moreno-Millan, M. & Demyda-Peyras, S. Effect of the rob(1;29) translocation on the fertility of beef cattle reared under extensive conditions: A 30-year retrospective study. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 57, 349–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.14073 (2022).
doi: 10.1111/rda.14073
pubmed: 34958697
Ducos, A. et al. Cytogenetic screening of livestock populations in Europe: An overview. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 120, 26–41. https://doi.org/10.1159/000118738 (2008).
doi: 10.1159/000118738
pubmed: 18467823
De Grouchy, J., Roubin, M. & Passage, E. Microtechnique pour l’etude des chromosomes humains a partir d’une culture de leucocytes sanguins (Microtechnic for the study of human chromosomes from a human leukocyte culture). Annales de genetique 45, 1 (1964).
Vozdova, M., Kubickova, S., Cernohorska, H. & Rubes, J. Detection of translocation rob(1;29) in bull sperm using a specific DNA probe. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 120, 102–105. https://doi.org/10.1159/000118746 (2008).
doi: 10.1159/000118746
pubmed: 18467831
Iannuzzi, A., Iannuzzi, L. & Parma, P. Molecular cytogenetics in domestic bovids: A review. Anim. Open Access J. MDPI 13, 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13050944 (2023).
doi: 10.3390/ani13050944
McNab, F. W., Rajsbaum, R., Stoye, J. P. & O’Garra, A. Tripartite-motif proteins and innate immune regulation. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 23, 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coi.2010.10.021 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2010.10.021
pubmed: 21131187
Switonski, M., Gustavsson, I. & Ploen, L. The nature of the 1;29 translocation in cattle as revealed by synaptonemal complex analysis using electron microscopy. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 44, 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1159/000132353 (1987).
doi: 10.1159/000132353
pubmed: 3568759
De Lorenzi, L. et al. Genomic analysis of cattle rob(1;29). Chromosome Res. Int. J. Mol. Supramol. Evolut. Aspects Chromosome Biol. 20, 815–823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10577-012-9315-y (2012).
doi: 10.1007/s10577-012-9315-y
Lewis, N. M. et al. The economic burden of chromosome translocations and the benefits of enhanced screening for cattle breeding. Anim. Open Access J. MDPI 12, 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12151982 (2022).
doi: 10.3390/ani12151982
Cortellari, M. et al. Identification of a common haplotype in carriers of rob(1;29) in 32 Italian cattle breeds. Sci. Rep. 14, 2057 (2024).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46341-3
pubmed: 38267480
pmcid: 10808231
Robinson, J. T. et al. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 24–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1754 (2011).
doi: 10.1038/nbt.1754
pubmed: 21221095
pmcid: 3346182
Bustin, S. A. et al. The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin. Chem. 55, 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797 (2009).
doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797
pubmed: 19246619
Iannuzzi, A. et al. Characterization of telomere length in Agerolese cattle breed, correlating blood and milk samples. Anim. Genet. 53, 676–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/age.13227 (2022).
doi: 10.1111/age.13227
pubmed: 35775462
pmcid: 9544343
Iannuzzi, A. et al. Evaluation of bovine sperm telomere length and association with semen quality. Theriogenology 158, 227–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.09.019 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.09.019
pubmed: 32980685