Aggregation of type-2 diabetes, prediabetes, and metabolic syndrome in German couples.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Feb 2024
05 Feb 2024
Historique:
received:
19
09
2023
accepted:
31
01
2024
medline:
6
2
2024
pubmed:
6
2
2024
entrez:
5
2
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We aimed to examine the concordance of type-2 diabetes, prediabetes and the metabolic syndrome in couples. In cross-sectional analyses, we used data from 1173 couples with index persons from the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study (2011-2015), a population-based cohort study in Western Germany, and partners from the associated Heinz Nixdorf Multigeneration Study (2013-2016). Mean age (standard deviation) was 67.2 (6.6) years in index persons, and 67.8 (7.7) years in partners. The exposure was the presence of diabetes, prediabetes or metabolic syndrome in index persons, the outcome was the presence of the same health status in partners. Diabetes was defined by either self-reported diagnosis, intake of antidiabetic drugs or insulin, or HbA1c ≥ 6.5%. If the index person had prediabetes or diabetes, the partner was 1.46 (95% CI 1.07-2.00) times more likely to have diabetes than partners of index persons without the condition in the crude model (adjusted model: 1.33 (0.97-1.83)). For self-reported diabetes and for the metabolic syndrome, the corresponding prevalence ratios were 1.33 (0.90-1.97) and 1.17 (1.03-1.32), respectively (adjusted models: 1.23 (0.77-1.94), 1.04 (0.91-1.18)). In German couples, there was weak to moderate concordance of type-2 diabetes, prediabetes and the metabolic syndrome in crude, but poor concordance in adjusted models.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38316913
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53417-1
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-53417-1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2984Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Idf diabetes atlas 10th edn, (International Diabetes Federation, 2021).
Sarwar, N. et al. Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: A collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies. Lancet 375, 2215–2222. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60484-9 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60484-9
pubmed: 20609967
Rao Kondapally Seshasai, S. et al. Diabetes mellitus, fasting glucose, and risk of cause-specific death. N. Engl. J. Med. 364, 829–841. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1008862 (2011).
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1008862
pubmed: 21366474
pmcid: 4109980
Di Castelnuovo, A., Quacquaruccio, G., Donati, M. B., de Gaetano, G. & Iacoviello, L. Spousal concordance for major coronary risk factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Epidemiol. 169, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwn234 (2009).
doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn234
pubmed: 18845552
Leong, A., Rahme, E. & Dasgupta, K. Spousal diabetes as a diabetes risk factor: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 12, 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-12-12 (2014).
doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-12
pubmed: 24460622
pmcid: 3900990
Appiah, D., Schreiner, P. J., Selvin, E., Demerath, E. W. & Pankow, J. S. Spousal diabetes status as a risk factor for incident type 2 diabetes: A prospective cohort study and meta-analysis. Acta Diabetol. 56, 619–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-019-01311-y (2019).
doi: 10.1007/s00592-019-01311-y
pubmed: 30888538
pmcid: 6520150
Ramezankhani, A., Guity, K., Azizi, F. & Hadaegh, F. Sex differences in the association between spousal metabolic risk factors with incidence of type 2 diabetes: A longitudinal study of the Iranian population. Biol. Sex Differ. 10, 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-019-0255-5 (2019).
doi: 10.1186/s13293-019-0255-5
pubmed: 31439024
pmcid: 6704543
Watanabe, T., Sugiyama, T., Takahashi, H., Noguchi, H. & Tamiya, N. Concordance of hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidaemia in married couples: Cross-sectional study using nationwide survey data in Japan. BMJ Open 10, e036281. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036281 (2020).
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036281
pubmed: 32723739
pmcid: 7389765
Jurj, A. L. et al. Spousal correlations for lifestyle factors and selected diseases in Chinese couples. Ann. Epidemiol. 16, 285–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2005.07.060 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2005.07.060
pubmed: 16257231
Cunningham, S. A., Adams, S. R., Schmittdiel, J. A. & Ali, M. K. Incidence of diabetes after a partner’s diagnosis. Prev. Med. 105, 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.08.020 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.08.020
pubmed: 28823754
pmcid: 5673498
Gillies, C. L. et al. Pharmacological and lifestyle interventions to prevent or delay type 2 diabetes in people with impaired glucose tolerance: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 334, 299. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39063.689375.55 (2007).
doi: 10.1136/bmj.39063.689375.55
pubmed: 17237299
pmcid: 1796695
Tuomilehto, J. et al. Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. N. Engl. J. Med. 344, 1343–1350. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200105033441801 (2001).
doi: 10.1056/nejm200105033441801
pubmed: 11333990
Alieva, A. S. et al. Prevalence and relationship between metabolic syndrome and risk of cardiovascular disease: Evidence from two population-based studies. Atheroscler. Suppl. 42, e41–e48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosissup.2021.01.008 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosissup.2021.01.008
pubmed: 33589223
Kim, H. C. et al. Spousal concordance of metabolic syndrome in 3141 Korean couples: A nationwide survey. Ann. Epidemiol. 16, 292–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2005.07.052 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2005.07.052
pubmed: 16230025
Khan, A., Lasker, S. S. & Chowdhury, T. A. Are spouses of patients with type 2 diabetes at increased risk of developing diabetes?. Diabetes Care 26, 710–712. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.26.3.710 (2003).
doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.3.710
pubmed: 12610026
Hsu, W.-H. et al. Common risk factors in relatives and spouses of patients with type 2 diabetes in developing prediabetes. Healthcare 9, 1010. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9081010 (2021).
doi: 10.3390/healthcare9081010
pubmed: 34442147
pmcid: 8394279
Okuda, T. et al. Significant but weak spousal concordance of metabolic syndrome components in Japanese couples. Environ. Health Prev. Med. 19, 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12199-013-0361-7 (2014).
doi: 10.1007/s12199-013-0361-7
pubmed: 24068391
Domingue, B. W., Fletcher, J., Conley, D. & Boardman, J. D. Genetic and educational assortative mating among US adults. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 7996–8000. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1321426111 (2014).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1321426111
pubmed: 24843128
pmcid: 4050565
Howe, L. J. et al. Assortative mating and within-spouse pair comparisons. PLoS Genet. 17, e1009883. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009883 (2021).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009883
pubmed: 34735433
pmcid: 8594845
Schwartz, C. R. Trends and variation in assortative mating: Causes and consequences. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 39, 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145544 (2013).
doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145544
Schmermund, A. et al. Assessment of clinically silent atherosclerotic disease and established and novel risk factors for predicting myocardial infarction and cardiac death in healthy middle-aged subjects: Rationale and design of the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study. Risk factors, evaluation of coronary calcium and lifestyle. Am. Heart J. 144, 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1067/mhj.2002.123579 (2002).
doi: 10.1067/mhj.2002.123579
pubmed: 12177636
Stang, A. et al. Baseline recruitment and analyses of nonresponse of the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study: Identifiability of phone numbers as the major determinant of response. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 20, 489–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-005-5529-z (2005).
doi: 10.1007/s10654-005-5529-z
pubmed: 16121757
Heinz nixdorf recall studie und heinz nixdorf mehrgenerationenstudie. https://imibe.uk-essen.de/forschung/forschungsprojekte/#nixdorf .
Elsayed, N. A. et al. 2 Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of care in diabetes—2023. Diabetes Care 46, S19–S40. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc23-s002 (2023).
doi: 10.2337/dc23-s002
pubmed: 36507649
Alberti, K. G. M. M. et al. Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome. Circulation 120, 1640–1645. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.109.192644 (2009).
doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.109.192644
pubmed: 19805654
Nordestgaard, B. G. et al. Fasting is not routinely required for determination of a lipid profile: Clinical and laboratory implications including flagging at desirable concentration cut-points-a joint consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society and European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Eur. Heart J. 37, 1944–1958. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw152 (2016).
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw152
pubmed: 27122601
pmcid: 4929379
Kowall, B. et al. Associations between sleep characteristics and weight gain in an older population: Results of the Heinz Nixdorf recall study. Nutr. Diabetes 6, e225. https://doi.org/10.1038/nutd.2016.32 (2016).
doi: 10.1038/nutd.2016.32
pubmed: 27525820
pmcid: 5022146
Andrich, S. B. Der Zusammenhang von körperlicher Aktivität und koronarer Verkalkung - Ergebnisse aus der Heinz Nixdorf Recall Studie. Universität Duisburg-Essen (2013).
Lucht, S. et al. All-source and source-specific air pollution and 10-year diabetes incidence: Total effect and mediation analyses in the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study. Environ. Int. 136, 105493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105493 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105493
pubmed: 31991234
Winkler, G. & Döring, A. Kurzmethoden zur charakterisierung des ernährungsmusters: Einsatz und auswertung eines food-frequency-fragebogens. Ernährungs-Umschau 42, 289–291 (1995).
Winkler, G. & Döring, A. Validation of a short qualitative food frequency list used in several german large scale surveys. Z. Ernährungswiss. 37(3), 234–241 (1998).
pubmed: 9800314
Heidemann, C. et al. Temporal changes in the prevalence of diagnosed diabetes, undiagnosed diabetes and prediabetes: Findings from the German health interview and examination surveys in 1997–1999 and 2008–2011. Diabet. Med. 33, 1406–1414. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.13008 (2016).
doi: 10.1111/dme.13008
pubmed: 26498983
Greenland, S. Basic methods for sensitivity analysis of biases. Int. J. Epidemiol. 25, 1107–1116 (1996).
doi: 10.1093/ije/25.6.1107
pubmed: 9027513
Fox, M. P., MacLehose, R. & Lash, T. L. Applying Quantitative Bias Analysis to Epidemiologic Data 2nd edn. (Springer, 2021).
doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-82673-4
Fox, M. Applying quantitative bias analysis to epidemiologic data. https://sites.google.com/site/biasanalysis/Home?authuser=0 .
Mothojakan, N. B., McCafferty, S. H. K., Yaqobb, M. M. & Chowdhury, T. A. Comparison of spousal and family history of diabetes, hypertension and renal disease between haemodialysis patients with diabetes and haemodialysis patients without diabetes. Diabet. Med. 33, 159–159 (2016).
Jun, S. Y., Kang, M., Kang, S. Y., Lee, J. A. & Kim, Y. S. Spousal concordance regarding lifestyle factors and chronic diseases among couples visiting primary care providers in Korea. Korean J. Fam. Med. 41, 183–188. https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.18.0104 (2020).
doi: 10.4082/kjfm.18.0104
pubmed: 32456386
pmcid: 7272367
Sackett, D. L., Deeks, J. J. & Altman, D. G. Down with odds ratios!. Evid. Based Med. 1, 164–166 (1996).
Davies, H. T., Crombie, I. K. & Tavakoli, M. When can odds ratios mislead?. BMJ 316, 989–991. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7136.989 (1998).
doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7136.989
pubmed: 9550961
pmcid: 1112884
Deeks, J. et al. When can odds ratios mislead?. BMJ 317, 1155–1155. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7166.1155a (1998).
doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7166.1155a
pubmed: 9784470
pmcid: 1114127
Schechtman, E. Odds ratio, relative risk, absolute risk reduction, and the number needed to treat–which of these should we use?. Value Health 5, 431–436. https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1524-4733.2002.55150.x (2002).
doi: 10.1046/J.1524-4733.2002.55150.x
pubmed: 12201860
Al-Sharbatti, S. S., Abed, Y. I., Al-Heety, L. M. & Basha, S. A. Spousal concordance of diabetes mellitus among women in Ajman, United Arab Emirates. Sultan Qaboos Univ. Med. J. 16, e197-202. https://doi.org/10.18295/squmj.2016.16.02.010 (2016).
doi: 10.18295/squmj.2016.16.02.010
pubmed: 27226911
pmcid: 4868519
Stimpson, J. P. & Peek, M. K. Concordance of chronic conditions in older Mexican American couples. Prev. Chronic Dis. 2, A07 (2005).
pubmed: 15963309
pmcid: 1364516
Sun, J. et al. Prevalence of diabetes and cardiometabolic disorders in spouses of diabetic individuals. Am. J. Epidemiol. 184, 400–409. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwv330 (2016).
doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv330
pubmed: 27530336
He, D. et al. Association between particulate matter 2.5 and diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. J. Diabetes Investig. 8, 687–696. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.12631 (2017).
doi: 10.1111/jdi.12631
pubmed: 28122165
pmcid: 5583950
Sui, H. et al. Association between work-related stress and risk for type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. PLoS One 11, e0159978. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159978 (2016).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159978
pubmed: 27513574
pmcid: 4981307
Huth, C. et al. Job strain as a risk factor for the onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus: Findings from the Monica/Kora Augsburg cohort study. Psychosom. Med. 76, 562–568. https://doi.org/10.1097/psy.0000000000000084 (2014).
doi: 10.1097/psy.0000000000000084
pubmed: 25102002
Beulens, J. W. J. et al. Environmental risk factors of type 2 diabetes—An exposome approach. Diabetologia 65, 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-021-05618-w (2022).
doi: 10.1007/s00125-021-05618-w
pubmed: 34792619