Feasibility and uptake of a digital mental health intervention for depression among Lebanese and Syrian displaced people in Lebanon: a qualitative study.
Step-by-Step
depression
digital interventions
displaced people
dropout
low-to-middle income countries
qualitative evaluation
uptake
Journal
Frontiers in public health
ISSN: 2296-2565
Titre abrégé: Front Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101616579
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
12
09
2023
accepted:
22
12
2023
medline:
7
2
2024
pubmed:
6
2
2024
entrez:
6
2
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Digital interventions are increasingly regarded as a potential solution for the inaccessibility of mental health treatment across low-and-middle-income settings, especially for common mental disorders. Step-by-Step (SbS) is a digital, guided self-help intervention for depression found effective in two Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) in Lebanon. For research implementation and further scale-up, this paper reports the results of a qualitative evaluation of SbS among the Lebanese and others and displaced Syrians in Lebanon. Thirty-four Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) were executed with participants of the RCTs, SbS staff members, and external stakeholders. Questions garnered feedback about the feasibility, acceptability, enabling factors, and barriers to adhering to the research, implementation, and the SbS intervention. A thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo, and key themes, topics, and recommendations, on research methods and the intervention itself, were generated and reported. Results showed a high level of acceptability of SbS among Lebanese and Syrians and identified sub-groups for whom acceptance or use might be lower, such as older adults and people with limited access to the internet or smartphones. Furthermore, interviews identified the main enabling factors and barriers to adherence related to the research design, content, and delivery approach. Barriers related to feasibility included lengthy assessments as part of the RCTs, and mistrust related to delays in study compensations. Other common challenges were forgetting login credentials, poor internet connection, being busy and competing needs. Enabling factors and best practices included motivating participants to use the intervention through the weekly support provided by helpers, setting an oral contract for commitment, and dividing the compensations into several installments as part of the RCTs. Recommendations regarding sustainability were given. The findings show that overall, SbS is feasible, acceptable, and much needed in Lebanon among the Lebanese and Syrians. This assessment identifies reasons for low adherence to the research and the intervention and presents improvement solutions. Recommendations generated in this paper inform the upscale of SbS and the planning, design, and implementation of future digital interventions in research and service provision settings in the mental health field.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38317685
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1293187
pmc: PMC10840138
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1293187Subventions
Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : 001
Pays : International
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Abi Ramia, Abi Hana, Noun, Cuijpers, Carswell, van't Hof, Heim, Zoghbi, Sijbrandij and El Chammay.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Evid Based Ment Health. 2018 Aug;21(3):116-119
pubmed: 29871870
PLoS Med. 2022 Jun 23;19(6):e1004025
pubmed: 35737665
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 12;10:986
pubmed: 32116815
Evid Based Ment Health. 2022 Dec;25(e1):e34-e40
pubmed: 35577536
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2015 Jul 14;2:e12
pubmed: 28596860
Internet Interv. 2016 Jan 06;4:1-10
pubmed: 30135786
J Affect Disord. 2018 Jul;234:193-200
pubmed: 29529553
BMJ. 2000 Jan 8;320(7227):114-6
pubmed: 10625273
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2022 May 7;16(1):23
pubmed: 35525972
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2022 Jun 14;9:250-263
pubmed: 36618716
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Jul 1;76(7):700-707
pubmed: 30994877
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 06;10(2):e0116820
pubmed: 25658103
Cogn Behav Ther. 2009;38(4):196-205
pubmed: 20183695
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Aug 24;20(8):e10351
pubmed: 30143479
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 16;9(7):e100674
pubmed: 25029507
Internet Interv. 2021 Mar 04;24:100380
pubmed: 33747798
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 24;23(3):e24387
pubmed: 33759801
Lancet. 2020 Oct 31;396(10260):1380-1382
pubmed: 32919521
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Jun 2;17(1):78
pubmed: 28577543
Front Public Health. 2014 Jun 11;2:65
pubmed: 24967221
Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;4(6):486-500
pubmed: 28433615
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jan 13;18(1):e10
pubmed: 26764181
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 25;9:663
pubmed: 30740065
Lancet. 2006 Mar 25;367(9515):1000-6
pubmed: 16564362
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Aug;28(4):376-388
pubmed: 30739625
J Med Internet Res. 2005 Mar 31;7(1):e11
pubmed: 15829473
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Jan 28;10(1):e21585
pubmed: 33507158
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 27;19(4):e136
pubmed: 28450271
Mhealth. 2018 Aug 13;4:34
pubmed: 30225240
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2018 Nov 27;5:e39
pubmed: 30637112
Br J Clin Psychol. 2010 Nov;49(Pt 4):455-71
pubmed: 19799804