Population-based integrated care funding values and guiding principles: An empirical qualitative study.

Health policy Healthcare care funding Integrated care Qualitative study Values

Journal

Heliyon
ISSN: 2405-8440
Titre abrégé: Heliyon
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101672560

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 16 05 2023
revised: 03 01 2024
accepted: 17 01 2024
medline: 6 2 2024
pubmed: 6 2 2024
entrez: 6 2 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

There is wide agreement on the benefits of integrated care; yet funding barriers persist. We suggest that funding models could currently hinder quality of care and that identifying values is necessary to designing adequate funding models. Yet it is currently unclear what are these values that ought to shape healthcare policy decisions. To fill in this gap, we conducted semi-structure interviews with fourteen health policy officials, managers, and researchers to elicit and explore how they conceptualize the values and guiding principles underlying these funding policies. Our findings suggest that values guide population-based integrated funding models, namely: accountability & integrity, transparency, equity, and innovation. Overall, funding mechanisms could incentivize integrated population-based care when the following conditions are met: a) there is transparent governance, with a whole-system approach, political will, and engagement and collaboration across health system partners, organizations and institutions, b) regulatory and evaluative frameworks support accountability including in decision-making, in outcomes and quality of care, as well as financial accountability; c) funding is equitable with a fair distribution of resources and supports accessibility to services; and d) funding mechanisms design and implementation include innovation enabling change, which are continuously evaluated. These values and guiding principles could be used in the development of funding models and future studies need to evaluate the effect of these values on decisions made by policy makers with respect to funding allocations and investments.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38317986
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24904
pii: S2405-8440(24)00935-6
pmc: PMC10839591
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e24904

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Maude Laberge (M)

Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, 1050 av de la Médecine, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, HÔpital du Saint-Sacrement, 1050, Chemin Ste-Foy, Québec, QC, G1S 4L8, Canada.
Vitam, Centre de Recherche en Santé Durable - Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada.

Francesca Brundisini (F)

Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, 1050 av de la Médecine, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Vitam, Centre de Recherche en Santé Durable - Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada.

Imtiaz Daniel (I)

Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto Health Sciences Building, 155 College Street, Suite 425, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M6, Canada.
Ontario Hospital Association, Toronto, Canada.

Maria Eugenia Espinoza Moya (ME)

Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, 1050 av de la Médecine, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, HÔpital du Saint-Sacrement, 1050, Chemin Ste-Foy, Québec, QC, G1S 4L8, Canada.

Classifications MeSH