Gut microbiota and polycystic ovary syndrome, focus on genetic associations: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study.

Background

The contribution of gut microbiota to the pathogenesis of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is controversial. The causal relationship to this question is worth an in-depth comprehensive of known single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with gut microbiota.

Methods

We conducted bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) utilizing instrumental variables associated with gut microbiota (N = 18,340) from MiBioGen GWAS to assess their impact on PCOS risk in the FinnGen GWAS (27,943 PCOS cases and 162,936 controls). Two-sample MR using inverse variance weighting (IVW) was undertaken, followed by the weighted median, weighted mode, and MR-Egger regression. In a subsample, we replicated our findings using the meta-analysis PCOS consortium (10,074 cases and 103,164 controls) from European ancestry.

Results

IVWMR results suggested that six gut microbiota were causally associated with PCOS features. After adjusting BMI, SHBG, fasting insulin, testosterone, and alcohol intake frequency, the effect sizes were significantly reduced. Reverse MR analysis revealed that the effects of PCOS features on 13 gut microbiota no longer remained significant after sensitivity analysis and Bonferroni corrections. MR replication analysis was consistent and the results suggest that gut microbiota was likely not an independent cause of PCOS.

Conclusion

Our findings did not support the causal relationships between the gut microbiota and PCOS features at the genetic level. More comprehensive genome-wide association studies of the gut microbiota and PCOS are warranted to confirm their genetic relationship.

Declaration

This study contains 3533 words, 0 tables, and six figures in the text as well as night supplementary files and 0 supplementary figures in the Supplementary material.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Wang, Fiori, Capobianco, Carru and Chen.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.