Cardiac Pulsed Field Ablation Lesion Durability Assessed by Polarization-Sensitive Optical Coherence Reflectometry.
atrial fibrillation
birefringence
myocytes, cardiac
phrenic nerve
pulmonary veins
Journal
Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology
ISSN: 1941-3084
Titre abrégé: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101474365
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2024
Mar 2024
Historique:
pubmed:
6
2
2024
medline:
6
2
2024
entrez:
6
2
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Pulsed field ablation uses electrical fields to cause nonthermal cell death over several hours. Polarization-sensitive optical coherence reflectometry is an optical imaging technique that can detect changes in the tissue ultrastructure in real time, which occurs when muscular tissue is damaged. The objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of a polarization-sensitive optical coherence reflectometry system to predict the development of chronic lesions based on acute changes in tissue birefringence during pulsed field ablation. Superior vena cava isolation was performed in 30 swine using a biphasic, bipolar pulsed field ablation system delivered with a nonirrigated focal tip catheter. Acute changes in tissue birefringence and voltage abatement were analyzed for each individual lesion. A high-resolution electroanatomical map was performed at baseline and 4 to 12 weeks after ablation to locate electrical gaps in the ablated area. A total of 141 lesions were delivered and included in the analysis. Acute electrical isolation based on the electroanatomical map was achieved in 96% of the animals, but chronic isolation was only seen in 14 animals (46%). The mean voltage abatement of lesions that showed recovery was 82.8%±14.6% versus 84.4%±17.4% for those that showed fibrosis ( Acute tissue birefringence changes assessed with polarization-sensitive optical coherence reflectometry during pulsed field ablation can predict chronic lesion formation and guide the ablation procedure although limited by the tissue thickness.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
UNASSIGNED
Pulsed field ablation uses electrical fields to cause nonthermal cell death over several hours. Polarization-sensitive optical coherence reflectometry is an optical imaging technique that can detect changes in the tissue ultrastructure in real time, which occurs when muscular tissue is damaged. The objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of a polarization-sensitive optical coherence reflectometry system to predict the development of chronic lesions based on acute changes in tissue birefringence during pulsed field ablation.
METHODS
UNASSIGNED
Superior vena cava isolation was performed in 30 swine using a biphasic, bipolar pulsed field ablation system delivered with a nonirrigated focal tip catheter. Acute changes in tissue birefringence and voltage abatement were analyzed for each individual lesion. A high-resolution electroanatomical map was performed at baseline and 4 to 12 weeks after ablation to locate electrical gaps in the ablated area.
RESULTS
UNASSIGNED
A total of 141 lesions were delivered and included in the analysis. Acute electrical isolation based on the electroanatomical map was achieved in 96% of the animals, but chronic isolation was only seen in 14 animals (46%). The mean voltage abatement of lesions that showed recovery was 82.8%±14.6% versus 84.4%±17.4% for those that showed fibrosis (
CONCLUSIONS
UNASSIGNED
Acute tissue birefringence changes assessed with polarization-sensitive optical coherence reflectometry during pulsed field ablation can predict chronic lesion formation and guide the ablation procedure although limited by the tissue thickness.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38318720
doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.123.012255
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e012255Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Heart Rhythm. 2023 Sep;20(9):1238-1245
pubmed: 37211146
Biomed Opt Express. 2015 Aug 07;6(9):3268-75
pubmed: 26417499
Lasers Surg Med. 2018 Mar;50(3):222-229
pubmed: 29168554
Europace. 2022 Sep 1;24(8):1256-1266
pubmed: 35647644
J Biomed Opt. 2010 May-Jun;15(3):030516
pubmed: 20614999
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jan 28;384(4):305-315
pubmed: 33197159
Heart Rhythm. 2017 Oct;14(10):e275-e444
pubmed: 28506916
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2021 Sep;14(9):e010086
pubmed: 34538095
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2023 Mar;16(3):e011780
pubmed: 36735937
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2022 Oct;15(10):e011110
pubmed: 36166690
Bioelectrochemistry. 2021 Oct;141:107871
pubmed: 34147013
Cells. 2013 Mar 06;2(1):136-62
pubmed: 24709649
Circulation. 2023 Jul 4;148(1):35-46
pubmed: 37199171
Opt Lett. 2014 Sep 1;39(17):5066-9
pubmed: 25166075
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2022 Jan;15(1):e010168
pubmed: 34964367
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2021 Jul;10(2):101-107
pubmed: 34401182
Heart Rhythm O2. 2022 May 25;3(4):433-440
pubmed: 36097449
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Mar;34(3):693-699
pubmed: 36640426
Europace. 2021 Apr 6;23(4):565-574
pubmed: 33200213
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jul 23;74(3):315-326
pubmed: 31085321
Europace. 2005 Sep;7 Suppl 2:146-54
pubmed: 16102512
Europace. 2018 Nov 1;20(FI_3):f366-f376
pubmed: 29267853
J Biomech Eng. 2018 Jun 1;140(6):
pubmed: 29560492