Trends in Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Applications in the Year After Abortion Access Changes.


Journal

JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Feb 2024
Historique:
medline: 7 2 2024
pubmed: 7 2 2024
entrez: 7 2 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

State-specific abortion restrictions currently affect the training of approximately 44% of obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) residents in the US. Examination of where future trainees apply for residency is important. To assess changes in the percentage of applicants to OBGYN residency programs by state based on abortion restrictions in place after the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization (hereafter, Dobbs v Jackson) US Supreme Court decision and examine whether applicants' preference for programs, as suggested by the distribution of application signals that express higher interest, was associated with abortion bans. This serial cross-sectional study used anonymized data for all applicants to OBGYN residency programs in the US during September and October from 2019 to 2023. Data were obtained from the Association of American Medical Colleges Electronic Residency Application Service. Applications and program preference signals sent to OBGYN residency programs, analyzed by applicants' self-reported demographics. The primary outcome was differences in the percentage of unique applicants to OBGYN residency programs from 2019 to 2023, with programs categorized by state-based abortion restrictions after the Dobbs v Jackson decision. Secondary outcomes included the distribution of program signals by state abortion ban status. A total of 2463 applicants (2104 [85.4%] women) who applied to OBGYN programs for the 2023 residency match cycle were the focal sample of this study. While overall applicant numbers remained stable between 2019 and 2023, the number of applicants differed significantly by state abortion ban status in the 2022 (F2,1087 = 10.82; P < .001) and the 2023 (F2,1087 = 14.31; P < .001) match cycles. There were no differences in the number of signals received by programs in states with bans after controlling for known covariates such as number of applications received and program size, and there were no differences in the percentage of signals sent by out-of-state applicants to programs in states with different abortion laws than their home states (F2,268 = 2.41; P = .09). In this cross-sectional study, there was a small but statistically significant decrease in the number of applicants to OBGYN residency programs in states with abortion bans in 2023 compared with 2022. However, applicant signaling data did not vary by states' abortion ban status. While OBGYN residency programs almost completely filled in 2023, continued monitoring for the potential consequences of state abortion bans for OBGYN training is needed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38324311
pii: 2814621
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.55017
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e2355017

Auteurs

Maya M Hammoud (MM)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.

Helen K Morgan (HK)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.

Karen George (K)

Larner College of Medicine at University of Vermont, Burlington.

Arthur T Ollendorff (AT)

Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke.

John L Dalrymple (JL)

Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Dana Dunleavy (D)

Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC.

Min Zhu (M)

Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC.

Erika Banks (E)

NYU Long Island School of Medicine, New York, New York.

Bukky Ajagbe Akingbola (BA)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

AnnaMarie Connolly (A)

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC.

Classifications MeSH