Impact of and interplay between proton arc therapy and range uncertainties in proton therapy for head-and-neck cancer.
IMPT
PAT
SPArc
proton arc therapy
proton therapy
range uncertainty
Journal
Physics in medicine and biology
ISSN: 1361-6560
Titre abrégé: Phys Med Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0401220
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Feb 2024
07 Feb 2024
Historique:
medline:
7
2
2024
pubmed:
7
2
2024
entrez:
7
2
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Proton therapy reduces the integral dose to the patient compared to conventional photon treatments. However, in vivo proton range uncertainties remain a considerable hurdle. Range uncertainty reduction benefits depend on clinical practices. During intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), the target is irradiated from only a few directions, but proton arc therapy (PAT), for which the target is irradiated from dozens of angles, may see clinical implementation by the time considerable range uncertainty reductions are achieved. It is therefore crucial to determine the impact of PAT on range uncertainty reduction benefits.
Approach: For twenty head-and-neck cancer patients, four different treatment plans were created: an IMPT and a PAT treatment plan assuming current clinical range uncertainties of 3.5% (IMPT3.5% and PAT3.5%), and an IMPT and a PAT treatment plan assuming that range uncertainties can be reduced to 1% (IMPT1% and PAT1%). Plans were evaluated with respect to target coverage and organ-at-risk doses as well as normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) for parotid glands (endpoint: parotid gland flow < 25%) and larynx (endpoint: larynx edema). 
Main results: Implementation of PAT (IMPT3.5%-PAT3.5%) reduced mean NTCPs in the nominal and worst-case scenario by 3.2 percentage points (pp) and 4.2 pp, respectively. Reducing range uncertainties from 3.5% to 1% during use of IMPT (IMPT3.5%-IMPT1%) reduced evaluated NTCPs by 0.9 pp and 2.0 pp. Benefits of range uncertainty reductions subsequently to PAT implementation (PAT3.5%- PAT1%) were 0.2 pp and 1.0 pp, with considerably higher benefits in bilateral compared to unilateral cases.
Significance: The mean clinical benefit of implementing PAT was more than twice as high as the benefit of a 3.5% to 1% range uncertainty reduction. Range uncertainty reductions are expected to remain beneficial even after PAT implementation, especially in cases with target positions allowing for full leveraging of the higher number of gantry angles during PAT.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38324904
doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad2718
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.