Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in the management of obese patients with early endometrial cancer in the sentinel lymph node era: a randomized controlled study (RObese).

Endometrial Neoplasms Laparoscopes Surgical Oncology Uterine Cancer

Journal

International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society
ISSN: 1525-1438
Titre abrégé: Int J Gynecol Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9111626

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Feb 2024
Historique:
medline: 8 2 2024
pubmed: 8 2 2024
entrez: 7 2 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Nearly 65% of patients with endometrial cancer who undergo primary hysterectomy have concurrent obesity. Retrospective data show advantages in using robotic surgery in these patients compared with conventional laparoscopy, namely lower conversion rate, increased rate of same-day discharge, and reduced blood loss. Nevertheless, to date no prospective randomized controlled trials have compared laparoscopic surgery versus robotic-assisted surgery in morbidly obese patients. The robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in the management of obese patients with early endometrial cancer in the sentinel lymph node era: a randomized controlled study (RObese) trial aims to find the most appropriate minimally invasive surgical approach in morbidly obese patients with endometrial carcinoma. Robotic surgery will reduce conversions to laparotomy in endometrial cancer patients with obesity compared with those who undergo surgery with conventional laparoscopy. This phase III multi-institutional study will randomize consecutive obese women with apparent early-stage endometrial cancer to either laparoscopic or robot-assisted surgery. The RObese trial will include obese (BMI≥30 kg/m Conversion rate to laparotomy between laparoscopic surgery versus robot-assisted surgery. RObese is a superiority trial. The clinical superiority margin for this study is defined as a difference in conversion rate of -6%. Assuming a significance level of 0.05 and a power of 80%, the study plans to randomize 566 patients. Patient recruitment will be completed by 2026, and follow-up will be completed by 2029 with presentation of data shortly thereafter. Two interim analyses are planned: one after the first 188 and the second after 376 randomized patients. NCT05974995.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Nearly 65% of patients with endometrial cancer who undergo primary hysterectomy have concurrent obesity. Retrospective data show advantages in using robotic surgery in these patients compared with conventional laparoscopy, namely lower conversion rate, increased rate of same-day discharge, and reduced blood loss. Nevertheless, to date no prospective randomized controlled trials have compared laparoscopic surgery versus robotic-assisted surgery in morbidly obese patients.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
The robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in the management of obese patients with early endometrial cancer in the sentinel lymph node era: a randomized controlled study (RObese) trial aims to find the most appropriate minimally invasive surgical approach in morbidly obese patients with endometrial carcinoma.
STUDY HYPOTHESIS OBJECTIVE
Robotic surgery will reduce conversions to laparotomy in endometrial cancer patients with obesity compared with those who undergo surgery with conventional laparoscopy.
TRIAL DESIGN METHODS
This phase III multi-institutional study will randomize consecutive obese women with apparent early-stage endometrial cancer to either laparoscopic or robot-assisted surgery.
MAJOR INCLUSION/EXCLUSION RITERIA UNASSIGNED
The RObese trial will include obese (BMI≥30 kg/m
PRIMARY ENDPOINT METHODS
Conversion rate to laparotomy between laparoscopic surgery versus robot-assisted surgery.
SAMPLE SIZE METHODS
RObese is a superiority trial. The clinical superiority margin for this study is defined as a difference in conversion rate of -6%. Assuming a significance level of 0.05 and a power of 80%, the study plans to randomize 566 patients.
ESTIMATED DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING RESULTS UNASSIGNED
Patient recruitment will be completed by 2026, and follow-up will be completed by 2029 with presentation of data shortly thereafter. Two interim analyses are planned: one after the first 188 and the second after 376 randomized patients.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
NCT05974995.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38326228
pii: ijgc-2023-005197
doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-005197
pii:
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05974995']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© IGCS and ESGO 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Giorgia Dinoi (G)

UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Vincenzo Tarantino (V)

UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Nicolò Bizzarri (N)

UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Emanuele Perrone (E)

UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Ilaria Capasso (I)

UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Diana Giannarelli (D)

Facility of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Denis Querleu (D)

UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Maria Consiglia Giuliano (MC)

UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Anna Fagotti (A)

UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

Giovanni Scambia (G)

UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

Francesco Fanfani (F)

UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy francesco.fanfani74@gmail.com.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

Classifications MeSH