Characterizing ATP processing by the AAA+ protein p97 at the atomic level.


Journal

Nature chemistry
ISSN: 1755-4349
Titre abrégé: Nat Chem
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101499734

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 24 03 2023
accepted: 04 01 2024
medline: 8 2 2024
pubmed: 8 2 2024
entrez: 7 2 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The human enzyme p97 regulates various cellular pathways by unfolding hundreds of protein substrates in an ATP-dependent manner, making it an essential component of protein homeostasis and an impactful pharmacological target. The hexameric complex undergoes substantial conformational changes throughout its catalytic cycle. Here we elucidate the molecular motions that occur at the active site in the temporal window immediately before and after ATP hydrolysis by merging cryo-EM, NMR spectroscopy and molecular dynamics simulations. p97 populates a metastable reaction intermediate, the ADP·P

Identifiants

pubmed: 38326645
doi: 10.1038/s41557-024-01440-0
pii: 10.1038/s41557-024-01440-0
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation)
ID : 201302640
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation)
ID : 201302640
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation)
ID : 154113120
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation)
ID : EXC 2067/1-390729940
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation)
ID : 394455587
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation)
ID : 201302640

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Stach, L. & Freemont, P. S. The AAA+ ATPase p97, a cellular multitool. Biochem. J. 474, 2953–2976 (2017).
pubmed: 28819009 doi: 10.1042/BCJ20160783
Richly, H. et al. A series of ubiquitin binding factors connects CDC48/p97 to substrate multiubiquitylation and proteasomal targeting. Cell 120, 73–84 (2005).
pubmed: 15652483 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.013
Rabouille, C., Levine, T. P., Peters, J. M. & Warren, G. An NSF-like ATPase, p97 and NSF mediate cisternal regrowth from mitotic Golgi fragments. Cell 82, 905–914 (1995).
pubmed: 7553851 doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90270-8
Ju, J. S. et al. Valosin-containing protein (VCP) is required for autophagy and is disrupted in VCP disease. J. Cell Biol. 187, 875–888 (2009).
pubmed: 20008565 pmcid: 2806317 doi: 10.1083/jcb.200908115
Banerjee, S. et al. 2.3-Å resolution cryo-EM structure of human p97 and mechanism of allosteric inhibition. Science 351, 871–875 (2016).
pubmed: 26822609 pmcid: 6946184 doi: 10.1126/science.aad7974
Tang, W. K. et al. A novel ATP-dependent conformation in p97 N-D1 fragment revealed by crystal structures of disease-related mutants. EMBO J. 29, 2217–2229 (2010).
pubmed: 20512113 pmcid: 2905243 doi: 10.1038/emboj.2010.104
Pan, M. et al. Mechanistic insight into substrate processing and allosteric inhibition of human p97. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 28, 614–625 (2021).
pubmed: 34262183 doi: 10.1038/s41594-021-00617-2
Cooney, I. et al. Structure of the Cdc48 segregase in the act of unfolding an authentic substrate. Science 365, 502–505 (2019).
pubmed: 31249134 pmcid: 7362759 doi: 10.1126/science.aax0486
Twomey, E. C. et al. Substrate processing by the Cdc48 ATPase complex is initiated by ubiquitin unfolding. Science 365, eaax1033 (2019).
pubmed: 31249135 pmcid: 6980381 doi: 10.1126/science.aax1033
Puchades, C., Sandate, C. R. & Lander, G. C. The molecular principles governing the activity and functional diversity of AAA+ proteins. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 43–58 (2020).
pubmed: 31754261 doi: 10.1038/s41580-019-0183-6
Rydzek, S., Shein, M., Bielytskyi, P. & Schütz, A. K. Observation of a transient reaction intermediate illuminates the mechanochemical cycle of the AAA-ATPase p97. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 14472–14480 (2020).
pubmed: 32790300 doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c03180
Taylor, E. W., Lymn, R. W. & Moll, G. Myosin-product complex and its effect on the steady-state rate of nucleoside triphosphate hydrolysis. Biochemistry 9, 2984–2991 (1970).
pubmed: 5474799 doi: 10.1021/bi00817a008
Nam, K., Pu, J. & Karplus, M. Trapping the ATP binding state leads to a detailed understanding of the F1-ATPase mechanism. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 17851–17856 (2014).
pubmed: 25453082 pmcid: 4273398 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1419486111
Ma, W. & Schulten, K. Mechanism of substrate translocation by a ring-shaped ATPase motor at millisecond resolution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 3031–3040 (2015).
pubmed: 25646698 pmcid: 4393844 doi: 10.1021/ja512605w
Priess, M., Goddeke, H., Groenhof, G. & Schafer, L. V. Molecular mechanism of ATP hydrolysis in an ABC transporter. ACS Cent. Sci. 4, 1334–1343 (2018).
pubmed: 30410971 pmcid: 6202651 doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.8b00369
Zsolnay, V., Katkar, H. H., Chou, S. Z., Pollard, T. D. & Voth, G. A. Structural basis for polarized elongation of actin filaments. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 30458–30464 (2020).
pubmed: 33199648 pmcid: 7720195 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2011128117
Bock, L. V. & Grubmüller, H. Effects of cryo-EM cooling on structural ensembles. Nat. Commun. 13, 1709 (2022).
pubmed: 35361752 pmcid: 8971465 doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29332-2
Nogales, E. & Scheres, S. H. Cryo-EM: a unique tool for the visualization of macromolecular complexity. Mol. Cell 58, 677–689 (2015).
pubmed: 26000851 pmcid: 4441764 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.02.019
Dong, Y. et al. Cryo-EM structures and dynamics of substrate-engaged human 26S proteasome. Nature 565, 49–55 (2019).
pubmed: 30479383 doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0736-4
Wald, J. et al. Mechanism of AAA+ ATPase-mediated RuvAB-Holliday junction branch migration. Nature 609, 630–639 (2022).
pubmed: 36002576 pmcid: 9477746 doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05121-1
Eisele, M. R. et al. Expanded coverage of the 26S proteasome conformational landscape reveals mechanisms of peptidase gating. Cell Rep. 24, 1301–1315 (2018).
pubmed: 30067984 pmcid: 6140342 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.07.004
Flaherty, K. M., Wilbanks, S. M., DeLuca-Flaherty, C. & McKay, D. B. Structural basis of the 70-kilodalton heat shock cognate protein ATP hydrolytic activity. II. Structure of the active site with ADP or ATP bound to wild type and mutant ATPase fragment. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 12899–12907 (1994).
pubmed: 8175707 doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)99961-8
Reynolds, M. J., Hachicho, C., Carl, A. G., Gong, R. & Alushin, G. M. Bending forces and nucleotide state jointly regulate F-actin structure. Nature 611, 380–386 (2022).
pubmed: 36289330 pmcid: 9646526 doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05366-w
Heissler, S. M., Arora, A. S., Billington, N., Sellers, J. R. & Chinthalapudi, K. Cryo-EM structure of the autoinhibited state of myosin-2. Sci. Adv. 7, eabk3273 (2021).
pubmed: 34936462 pmcid: 8694606 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abk3273
Sobti, M., Ueno, H., Noji, H. & Stewart, A. G. The six steps of the complete F1-ATPase rotary catalytic cycle. Nat. Commun. 12, 4690 (2021).
pubmed: 34344897 pmcid: 8333055 doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25029-0
Gao, H. et al. Cryo-EM structures of human p97 double hexamer capture potentiated ATPase-competent state. Cell Discov. 8, 19 (2022).
pubmed: 35190543 pmcid: 8861141 doi: 10.1038/s41421-022-00379-1
Nandi, P. et al. Structural and functional analysis of disease-linked p97 ATPase mutant complexes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 8079 (2021).
pubmed: 34360842 pmcid: 8347982 doi: 10.3390/ijms22158079
Caffrey, B. et al. AAA+ ATPase p97/VCP mutants and inhibitor binding disrupt inter-domain coupling and subsequent allosteric activation. J. Biol. Chem. 297, 101187 (2021).
pubmed: 34520757 pmcid: 8517850 doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.101187
Tang, W. K. & Xia, D. Altered intersubunit communication is the molecular basis for functional defects of pathogenic p97 mutants. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 36624–36635 (2013).
pubmed: 24196964 pmcid: 3868774 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.488924
Schuetz, A. K. & Kay, L. E. A dynamic molecular basis for malfunction in disease mutants of p97/VCP. eLife 5, e20143 (2016).
pubmed: 27828775 pmcid: 5102582 doi: 10.7554/eLife.20143
Wendler, P., Ciniawsky, S., Kock, M. & Kube, S. Structure and function of the AAA+ nucleotide binding pocket. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1823, 2–14 (2012).
pubmed: 21839118 doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.06.014
Khan, Y. A., White, K. I. & Brunger, A. T. The AAA+ superfamily: a review of the structural and mechanistic principles of these molecular machines. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 57, 156–187 (2022).
Miller, B. R. III et al. MMPBSA.py: an efficient program for end-state free energy calculations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8, 3314–3321 (2012).
pubmed: 26605738 doi: 10.1021/ct300418h
Erzberger, J. P. & Berger, J. M. Evolutionary relationships and structural mechanisms of AAA+ proteins. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 35, 93–114 (2006).
pubmed: 16689629 doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.35.040405.101933
Murakami, K. et al. Structural basis for actin assembly, activation of ATP hydrolysis and delayed phosphate release. Cell 143, 275–287 (2010).
pubmed: 20946985 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.034
Merino, F. et al. Structural transitions of F-actin upon ATP hydrolysis at near-atomic resolution revealed by cryo-EM. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 25, 528–537 (2018).
pubmed: 29867215 doi: 10.1038/s41594-018-0074-0
O’Brien, M. C. & McKay, D. B. Threonine 204 of the chaperone protein Hsc70 influences the structure of the active site, but is not essential for ATP hydrolysis. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 24323–24329 (1993).
pubmed: 8226982 doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(20)80529-8
O’Donnell, J. P., Marsh, H. M., Sondermann, H. & Sevier, C. S. Disrupted hydrogen-bond network and impaired ATPase activity in an Hsc70 cysteine mutant. Biochemistry 57, 1073–1086 (2018).
pubmed: 29300467 doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b01005
Corbett, K. D. & Berger, J. M. Structural dissection of ATP turnover in the prototypical GHL ATPase TopoVI. Structure 13, 873–882 (2005).
pubmed: 15939019 doi: 10.1016/j.str.2005.03.013
Shin, M. et al. Structural basis for distinct operational modes and protease activation in AAA+ protease Lon. Sci. Adv. 6, eaba8404 (2020).
pubmed: 32490208 pmcid: 7239648 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba8404
de la Pena, A. H., Goodall, E. A., Gates, S. N., Lander, G. C. & Martin, A. Substrate-engaged 26S proteasome structures reveal mechanisms for ATP-hydrolysis-driven translocation. Science 362, eaav0725 (2018).
pubmed: 30309908 pmcid: 6519459 doi: 10.1126/science.aav0725
Jurrus, E. et al. Improvements to the APBS biomolecular solvation software suite. Protein Sci. 27, 112–128 (2018).
pubmed: 28836357 doi: 10.1002/pro.3280
Jensen, L. M., Walker, E. J. & Ghildyal, R. (eds) Rhinoviruses, Methods and Protocols (Humana Press, 2014).
Vranken, W. F. et al. The CCPN data model for NMR spectroscopy: development of a software pipeline. Proteins 59, 687–696 (2005).
pubmed: 15815974 doi: 10.1002/prot.20449
Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017).
pubmed: 28250466 pmcid: 5494038 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4193
Zivanov, J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. eLife 7, e42166 (2018).
pubmed: 30412051 pmcid: 6250425 doi: 10.7554/eLife.42166
Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. CTFFIND4: fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 192, 216–221 (2015).
pubmed: 26278980 pmcid: 6760662 doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2015.08.008
Wagner, T. et al. SPHIRE-crYOLO is a fast and accurate fully automated particle picker for cryo-EM. Commun. Biol. 2, 218 (2019).
pubmed: 31240256 pmcid: 6584505 doi: 10.1038/s42003-019-0437-z
Kimanius, D., Dong, L., Sharov, G., Nakane, T. & Scheres, S. H. W. New tools for automated cryo-EM single-particle analysis in RELION-4.0. Biochem. J. 478, 4169–4185 (2021).
pubmed: 34783343 doi: 10.1042/BCJ20210708
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486–501 (2010).
pubmed: 20383002 pmcid: 2852313 doi: 10.1107/S0907444910007493
Liebschner, D. et al. Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix. Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. 75, 861–877 (2019).
pubmed: 31588918 pmcid: 6778852 doi: 10.1107/S2059798319011471
Salomon-Ferrer, R., Gotz, A. W., Poole, D., Le Grand, S. & Walker, R. C. Routine microsecond molecular dynamics simulations with AMBER on GPUs. 2. Explicit solvent particle mesh Ewald. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9, 3878–3888 (2013).
pubmed: 26592383 doi: 10.1021/ct400314y
AMBER 2018 (Univ. California, 2018).
Maier, J. A. et al. ff14SB: improving the accuracy of protein side chain and backbone parameters from ff99SB. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 3696–3713 (2015).
pubmed: 26574453 pmcid: 4821407 doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00255
Berendsen, H. J. C., Grigera, J. R. & Straatsma, T. P. The missing term in effective pair potentials. J. Phys. Chem. 91, 6269–6271 (1987).
doi: 10.1021/j100308a038
Li, P., Song, L. F. & Merz, K. M. Jr. Parameterization of highly charged metal ions using the 12-6-4 LJ-type nonbonded model in explicit water. J. Phys. Chem. B 119, 883–895 (2015).
pubmed: 25145273 doi: 10.1021/jp505875v
Meagher, K. L., Redman, L. T. & Carlson, H. A. Development of polyphosphate parameters for use with the AMBER force field. J. Comput. Chem. 24, 1016–1025 (2003).
pubmed: 12759902 doi: 10.1002/jcc.10262
Wang, J., Wolf, R. M., Caldwell, J. W., Kollman, P. A. & Case, D. A. Development and testing of a general amber force field. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1157–1174 (2004).
pubmed: 15116359 doi: 10.1002/jcc.20035
Fox, T. & Kollman, P. A. Application of the RESP methodology in the parametrization of organic solvents. J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 8070–8079 (1998).
doi: 10.1021/jp9717655
Frisch. M. J. et al. Gaussian 09, Revision A. 02 (Gaussian, Inc., 2016).
Goga, N., Rzepiela, A. J., de Vries, A. H., Marrink, S. J. & Berendsen, H. J. Efficient algorithms for Langevin and DPD dynamics. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8, 3637–3649 (2012).
pubmed: 26593009 doi: 10.1021/ct3000876
Åqvist, J., Wennerström, P., Nervall, M., Bjelic, S. & Brandsdal, B. O. Molecular dynamics simulations of water and biomolecules with a Monte Carlo constant pressure algorithm. Chem. Phys. Lett. 384, 288–294 (2004).
doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2003.12.039
Darden, T., York, D. & Pedersen, L. Particle mesh Ewald: an N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J. Chem. Phys. 98, 10089–10092 (1993).
doi: 10.1063/1.464397
Andersen, H. C. Rattle: a ‘velocity’ version of the shake algorithm for molecular dynamics calculations. J. Comput. Phys. 52, 24–34 (1983).
doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(83)90014-1
Hopkins, C. W., Grand, S. L., Walker, R. C. & Roitberg, A. E. Long-time-step molecular dynamics through hydrogen mass repartitioning. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 1864–1874 (2015).
pubmed: 26574392 doi: 10.1021/ct5010406
Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph 14, 33–38 (1996).
pubmed: 8744570 doi: 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5
Roe, D. R. & Cheatham, T. E. III. PTRAJ and CPPTRAJ: software for processing and analysis of molecular dynamics trajectory data. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9, 3084–3095 (2013).
pubmed: 26583988 doi: 10.1021/ct400341p
Dolinsky, T. J. et al. PDB2PQR: expanding and upgrading automated preparation of biomolecular structures for molecular simulations. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W522–W525 (2007).
pubmed: 17488841 pmcid: 1933214 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm276
Sievers, F. et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 539 (2011).
pubmed: 21988835 pmcid: 3261699 doi: 10.1038/msb.2011.75
Waterhouse, A. M., Procter, J. B., Martin, D. M., Clamp, M. & Barton, G. J. Jalview Version 2—a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics 25, 1189–1191 (2009).
pubmed: 19151095 pmcid: 2672624 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).
pubmed: 15264254 doi: 10.1002/jcc.20084
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators and developers. Protein Sci. 30, 70–82 (2021).
pubmed: 32881101 doi: 10.1002/pro.3943
Waskom, M. seaborn: statistical data visualization. J Open Source Softw 6, 3021 (2021).
doi: 10.21105/joss.03021
Goody, R. S. & Eckstein, F. Thiophosphate analogs of nucleoside di- and triphosphates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 93, 6252–6257 (2002).
doi: 10.1021/ja00752a042
Yount, R. G., Babcock, D., Ballantyne, W. & Ojala, D. Adenylyl imidiodiphosphate, an adenosine triphosphate analog containing a P-N-P linkage. Biochemistry 10, 2484–2489 (1971).
pubmed: 4326768 doi: 10.1021/bi00789a009
Heinig, M. & Frishman, D. STRIDE: a web server for secondary structure assignment from known atomic coordinates of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, W500–W502 (2004).
pubmed: 15215436 pmcid: 441567 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh429
Ramachandran, G. N., Ramakrishnan, C. & Sasisekharan, V. Stereochemistry of polypeptide chain configurations. J. Mol. Biol. 7, 95–99 (1963).
pubmed: 13990617 doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(63)80023-6
Fraústo da Silva, J. J. R. The Biological Chemistry Of The Elements: The Inorganic Chemistry Of Life (Clarendon, 1991).
Hanzelmann, P. & Schindelin, H. Structural basis of ATP hydrolysis and intersubunit signaling in the AAA+ ATPase p97. Structure 24, 127–139 (2016).
pubmed: 26712278 doi: 10.1016/j.str.2015.10.026

Auteurs

Mikhail Shein (M)

Faculty for Chemistry and Pharmacy, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany.
Bavarian NMR Center, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.
Institute of Structural Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.

Manuel Hitzenberger (M)

Physics Department and Center of Protein Assemblies, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany. manuel.hitzenberger@tum.de.

Tat Cheung Cheng (TC)

Institute for Neuropathology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Multiscale Bioimaging: from Molecular Machines to Networks of Excitable Cells (MBExC), University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

Smruti R Rout (SR)

Multiscale Bioimaging: from Molecular Machines to Networks of Excitable Cells (MBExC), University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Institute for Auditory Neuroscience, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

Kira D Leitl (KD)

Faculty for Chemistry and Pharmacy, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany.
Bavarian NMR Center, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.
Institute of Structural Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.

Yusuke Sato (Y)

Center for Research on Green Sustainable Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan.
Department of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Graduate School of Engineering, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan.

Martin Zacharias (M)

Physics Department and Center of Protein Assemblies, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany. martin.zacharias@ph.tum.de.

Eri Sakata (E)

Multiscale Bioimaging: from Molecular Machines to Networks of Excitable Cells (MBExC), University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany. eri.sakata@med.uni-goettingen.de.
Institute for Auditory Neuroscience, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany. eri.sakata@med.uni-goettingen.de.

Anne K Schütz (AK)

Faculty for Chemistry and Pharmacy, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany. anne.schuetz@cup.lmu.de.
Bavarian NMR Center, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany. anne.schuetz@cup.lmu.de.
Institute of Structural Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany. anne.schuetz@cup.lmu.de.

Classifications MeSH