State-Level Analysis of Intimate Partner Violence, Abortion Access, and Peripartum Homicide: Call for Screening and Violence Interventions for Pregnant Patients.


Journal

Journal of the American College of Surgeons
ISSN: 1879-1190
Titre abrégé: J Am Coll Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9431305

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Feb 2024
Historique:
medline: 8 2 2024
pubmed: 8 2 2024
entrez: 8 2 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Despite representing 4% of the global population, the United States has the 5th highest number of intentional homicides in the world. Peripartum people represent a unique and vulnerable subset of homicide victims. This study aims to understand the risk factors for peripartum homicide. We used data from the 2018-2020 National Violent Death Reporting System to compare homicide rates of peripartum and non-peripartum people capable of becoming pregnant (12-50 years of age). Peripartum was defined as currently pregnant or within one year postpartum. We additionally compared state-level peripartum homicide rates between states categorized as restrictive, neutral, or protective of abortion. Pearson's chi-squared and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used. There were 496 peripartum compared to 8,644 non-peripartum homicide victims. The peripartum group was younger (27.4 ± 71 vs 33.0 ± 9.6, p<0.001). Intimate partner violence (IPV) causing the homicide was more common in the peripartum group (39.9% vs. 26.4%, p<0.001). Firearms were used in 63.4% of homicides among the peripartum group compared to 49.5% in the comparison (p<0.001). There was a significant difference in peripartum homicide between states based on policies regarding abortion access (protective 0.37, neutral 0.45, restrictive 0.64; p<0.01); the same trend was not seen with male homicides. Compared to non-peripartum peers, peripartum people are at increased risk for homicide due to IPV, specifically due to firearm violence. Increasing rates of peripartum homicide occur in states with policies that are restrictive to abortion access. There is a dire need for universal screening and interventions for peripartum patients. Research and policies to reduce of violence against pregnant people must also consider the important role that abortion access plays in protecting safety.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Despite representing 4% of the global population, the United States has the 5th highest number of intentional homicides in the world. Peripartum people represent a unique and vulnerable subset of homicide victims. This study aims to understand the risk factors for peripartum homicide.
STUDY DESIGN METHODS
We used data from the 2018-2020 National Violent Death Reporting System to compare homicide rates of peripartum and non-peripartum people capable of becoming pregnant (12-50 years of age). Peripartum was defined as currently pregnant or within one year postpartum. We additionally compared state-level peripartum homicide rates between states categorized as restrictive, neutral, or protective of abortion. Pearson's chi-squared and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used.
RESULTS RESULTS
There were 496 peripartum compared to 8,644 non-peripartum homicide victims. The peripartum group was younger (27.4 ± 71 vs 33.0 ± 9.6, p<0.001). Intimate partner violence (IPV) causing the homicide was more common in the peripartum group (39.9% vs. 26.4%, p<0.001). Firearms were used in 63.4% of homicides among the peripartum group compared to 49.5% in the comparison (p<0.001). There was a significant difference in peripartum homicide between states based on policies regarding abortion access (protective 0.37, neutral 0.45, restrictive 0.64; p<0.01); the same trend was not seen with male homicides.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Compared to non-peripartum peers, peripartum people are at increased risk for homicide due to IPV, specifically due to firearm violence. Increasing rates of peripartum homicide occur in states with policies that are restrictive to abortion access. There is a dire need for universal screening and interventions for peripartum patients. Research and policies to reduce of violence against pregnant people must also consider the important role that abortion access plays in protecting safety.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38329176
doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000001019
pii: 00019464-990000000-00892
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 by the American College of Surgeons. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Grace Keegan (G)

University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.

Mark Hoofnagle (M)

Washington University, St Louis, MO.

Julie Chor (J)

University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.

David Hampton (D)

University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.

Jennifer Cone (J)

University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Washington University, St Louis, MO.
Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC.

Abid Khan (A)

University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.

Susan Rowell (S)

University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.

Timothy Plackett (T)

University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.

Andrew Benjamin (A)

University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.

Neha Bhardwaj (N)

University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.

Selwyn O Rogers (SO)

University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.

Tanya L Zakrison (TL)

University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.

Justin M Cirone (JM)

Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC.

Classifications MeSH