Evaluating an academic radiation oncology position.


Journal

Practical radiation oncology
ISSN: 1879-8519
Titre abrégé: Pract Radiat Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101558279

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 15 11 2023
revised: 08 01 2024
accepted: 14 01 2024
medline: 9 2 2024
pubmed: 9 2 2024
entrez: 8 2 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

What are the factors that physicians could consider in an academic radiation oncology practice job offer? In this mini-review, we discuss how prospective academic faculty could evaluate the "big 3" domains: (1) the compensation, including the direct and indirect payments; (2) the daily job, including aspects of the clinic, research, and education; and (3) the location, including geography, atmosphere, environment, and culture. If a prospective academic radiation oncologist believes that the academic practice is "great" in at least 2 of the 3, and "good" in the remaining 1, then they should likely sign the contract.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38331245
pii: S1879-8500(24)00033-X
doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2024.01.003
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Nicholas G Zaorsky (NG)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH. Electronic address: nicholas.zaorsky@uhhospitals.org.

Daniel M Trifiletti (DM)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.

Neha Vapiwala (N)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

Classifications MeSH