Comparison of real-time quantitative PCR and two digital PCR platforms to detect copy number variation in FCGR3B.

CNV Digital PCR Droplet digital PCR FCGR3B qPCR

Journal

Journal of immunological methods
ISSN: 1872-7905
Titre abrégé: J Immunol Methods
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 1305440

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 06 11 2023
revised: 02 02 2024
accepted: 05 02 2024
medline: 9 2 2024
pubmed: 9 2 2024
entrez: 8 2 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The importance of structural genetic variants, such as copy number variations (CNVs), in modulating human disease is being increasingly recognized. Several clinical conditions require investigation of human neutrophil antigen (HNA-1), which is encoded by the Fc gamma receptor IIIb gene (FCGR3B), including suspicion of neutropenia, infections, and proactive testing of blood component donors to reduce the potential risk in transfusion. In this study, we compared real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) with two digital PCR (dPCR) platforms, namely droplet digital PCR and an array-based platform, to determine CNV in FCGR3B. We initially tested 400 anonymous blood donors with qPCR using a commercially available TaqMan probe assay (Applied Biosystems) on a Quant Studio 12 Flex. CNV was determined for all 400 tested individuals with copy numbers ranging from zero to four. Zero copies were detected in 0.2% (1/400), one copy was detected in 3.8% (15/400), two copies were detected in 87.8% (351/400), three copies were detected in 8.0% (32/400), and four copies were detected in 0.2% (1/400) of tested individuals. From this cohort, we selected 32 donors with copy numbers from zero to four for analyses with Digital Real-Time PCR (dPCR) using Lab on an array (LOAA) on an On-Point analyzer from Optolane Technologies Inc. and the Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR) platform from Bio-Rad Laboratories. We compared the obtained copy numbers of FCGR3B on the three platforms and found full concordance between the copy numbers obtained. We therefore conclude that all three platforms can be used for quantification of copy numbers for FCGR3B, and although dPCR has some advantages over qPCR, it was not necessary for reliably estimating CNV of the FCGR3B gene.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38331313
pii: S0022-1759(24)00013-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2024.113628
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

113628

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest All authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Kirstine Kløve-Mogensen (K)

Department of Clinical Immunology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark. Electronic address: k.kloevemogensen@rn.dk.

Simone Karlsson Terp (SK)

Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark; Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark. Electronic address: s.terp@rn.dk.

Rudi Steffensen (R)

Department of Clinical Immunology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark. Electronic address: rns@rn.dk.

Classifications MeSH