Comparison of real-time quantitative PCR and two digital PCR platforms to detect copy number variation in FCGR3B.
CNV
Digital PCR
Droplet digital PCR
FCGR3B
qPCR
Journal
Journal of immunological methods
ISSN: 1872-7905
Titre abrégé: J Immunol Methods
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 1305440
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Feb 2024
06 Feb 2024
Historique:
received:
06
11
2023
revised:
02
02
2024
accepted:
05
02
2024
medline:
9
2
2024
pubmed:
9
2
2024
entrez:
8
2
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The importance of structural genetic variants, such as copy number variations (CNVs), in modulating human disease is being increasingly recognized. Several clinical conditions require investigation of human neutrophil antigen (HNA-1), which is encoded by the Fc gamma receptor IIIb gene (FCGR3B), including suspicion of neutropenia, infections, and proactive testing of blood component donors to reduce the potential risk in transfusion. In this study, we compared real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) with two digital PCR (dPCR) platforms, namely droplet digital PCR and an array-based platform, to determine CNV in FCGR3B. We initially tested 400 anonymous blood donors with qPCR using a commercially available TaqMan probe assay (Applied Biosystems) on a Quant Studio 12 Flex. CNV was determined for all 400 tested individuals with copy numbers ranging from zero to four. Zero copies were detected in 0.2% (1/400), one copy was detected in 3.8% (15/400), two copies were detected in 87.8% (351/400), three copies were detected in 8.0% (32/400), and four copies were detected in 0.2% (1/400) of tested individuals. From this cohort, we selected 32 donors with copy numbers from zero to four for analyses with Digital Real-Time PCR (dPCR) using Lab on an array (LOAA) on an On-Point analyzer from Optolane Technologies Inc. and the Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR) platform from Bio-Rad Laboratories. We compared the obtained copy numbers of FCGR3B on the three platforms and found full concordance between the copy numbers obtained. We therefore conclude that all three platforms can be used for quantification of copy numbers for FCGR3B, and although dPCR has some advantages over qPCR, it was not necessary for reliably estimating CNV of the FCGR3B gene.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38331313
pii: S0022-1759(24)00013-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2024.113628
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
113628Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest All authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.