Roles of the Red List of Ecosystems in the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.
Journal
Nature ecology & evolution
ISSN: 2397-334X
Titre abrégé: Nat Ecol Evol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101698577
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Feb 2024
08 Feb 2024
Historique:
received:
28
07
2023
accepted:
14
12
2023
medline:
9
2
2024
pubmed:
9
2
2024
entrez:
8
2
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) of the UN Convention on Biological Diversity set the agenda for global aspirations and action to reverse biodiversity loss. The GBF includes an explicit goal for maintaining and restoring biodiversity, encompassing ecosystems, species and genetic diversity (goal A), targets for ecosystem protection and restoration and headline indicators to track progress and guide action
Identifiants
pubmed: 38332025
doi: 10.1038/s41559-023-02320-5
pii: 10.1038/s41559-023-02320-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Department of Education and Training | Australian Research Council (ARC)
ID : FT190100234
Organisme : Department of Education and Training | Australian Research Council (ARC)
ID : LP170101143
Informations de copyright
© 2024. Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (CBD/COP/15/L.25) (Convention on Biological Diversity, 2022).
Decision Adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity 15/5. Monitoring framework for the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (CBD/COP/DEC/15/5) (Convention on Biological Diversity, 2022).
Keith, D. A. et al. Scientific foundations for an IUCN Red List of Ecosystems. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062111 (2013).
Leadley, P. et al. Achieving global biodiversity goals by 2050 requires urgent and integrated actions. One Earth 5, 597–603 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2022.05.009
Rowland, J. A. et al. Ecosystem indices to support global biodiversity conservation. Conserv. Lett. 13, e12680 (2020).
doi: 10.1111/conl.12680
Nicholson, E. et al. Scientific foundations for an ecosystem goal, milestones and indicators for the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1338–1349 (2021).
pubmed: 34400825
doi: 10.1038/s41559-021-01538-5
Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy (World Economic Forum, 2020).
Chaplin-Kramer, R. et al. Global modeling of nature’s contributions to people. Science 366, 255–258 (2019).
pubmed: 31601772
doi: 10.1126/science.aaw3372
Brondizio, E. S et al. (eds) Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES, 2019).
Watson, J. E. M. et al. Set a global target for ecosystems. Nature 578, 360–362 (2020).
pubmed: 32071453
doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-00446-1
Keith, D. A. et al. A function-based typology for Earth’s ecosystems. Nature 610, 513–518 (2022).
pubmed: 36224387
pmcid: 9581774
doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05318-4
Murray, N. J. et al. The role of satellite remote sensing in structured ecosystem risk assessments. Sci. Total Environ. 619–620, 249–257 (2018).
pubmed: 29149749
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.034
Edens, B. et al. Establishing the SEEA Ecosystem Accounting as a global standard. Ecosyst. Serv. 54, 101413 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101413
Keith, D. A. et al. The IUCN Red List of Ecosystems: motivations, challenges and applications. Conserv. Lett. 8, 214–226 (2015).
doi: 10.1111/conl.12167
Betts, J. et al. A framework for evaluating the impact of the IUCN Red List of threatened species. Conserv. Biol. 34, 632–643 (2020).
pubmed: 31876054
pmcid: 7318271
doi: 10.1111/cobi.13454
Brooks, T. M. et al. Analysing biodiversity and conservation knowledge products to support regional environmental assessments. Sci. Data 3, 160007 (2016).
pubmed: 26881749
pmcid: 4755129
doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.7
Raimondo, D. et al. Using Red List indices to monitor extinction risk at national scales. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 5, e12854 (2023).
doi: 10.1111/csp2.12854
Salomaa, A. & Arponen, A. The role of the Red Lists of Ecosystems in leveraging sustainability changes in Finland—perceptions of the assessors. Ecosyst. People 19, 2222185 (2023).
doi: 10.1080/26395916.2023.2222185
Botts, E. A. et al. More than just a (red) list: over a decade of using South Africa’s threatened ecosystems in policy and practice. Biol. Conserv. 246, 108559 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108559
Bland, L. M. et al. Impacts of the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems on conservation policy and practice. Conserv. Lett. 12, e12666 (2019).
doi: 10.1111/conl.12666
Keith, D. A. et al. Contributions of Red Lists of Ecosystems to risk-based design and management of protected and conserved areas in Africa. Conserv. Biol., https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14169 (2023).
Brooks, T. M. et al. Harnessing biodiversity and conservation knowledge products to track the Aichi targets and Sustainable Development Goals. Biodiversity 16, 157–174 (2015).
doi: 10.1080/14888386.2015.1075903
Lequiller, F. & Blades, D. Understanding National Accounts (OECD, 2014).
Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD) Recommendations v.1.0, https://tnfd.global/ (TNFD, 2023).
IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria v.3.1 (IUCN, 2001).
Guidelines for Using a Global Standard for the Identification of Key Biodiversity Areas v.1.2 (IUCN, 2022).
A Global Standard for the Identification of Key Biodiversity Areas v.1.0, 1st edn (IUCN, 2016).
Murray, N. J. et al. Myanmar’s terrestrial ecosystems: status, threats and conservation opportunities. Biol. Conserv. 252, 108834 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108834
Nicholson, E. et al. Towards consistency, rigour and compatibility of risk assessments for ecosystems and ecological communities. Austral Ecol. 40, 347–363 (2015).
doi: 10.1111/aec.12148
Nicholson, E., Keith, D. A. & Wilcove, D. S. Assessing the threat status of ecological communities. Conserv. Biol. 23, 259–274 (2009).
pubmed: 19245533
doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01158.x
Alaniz, A. J., Pérez-Quezada, J. F., Galleguillos, M., Vásquez, A. E. & Keith, D. A. Operationalizing the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems in public policy. Conserv. Lett. 0, e12665 (2019).
doi: 10.1111/conl.12665
Guidance Note 6: Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Management of Living Natural Resources (International Finance Corporation, 2019).
Rowland, J. A. et al. Selecting and applying indicators of ecosystem collapse for risk assessments. Conserv. Biol. 32, 1233–1245 (2018).
pubmed: 29528525
doi: 10.1111/cobi.13107
Venegas-Li, R. et al. An operational methodology to identify critical ecosystem areas to help nations achieve the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. Preprint at BioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.03.539215 (2023).
Jones, K. R. et al. Spatial analysis to inform the mitigation hierarchy. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 4, e12686 (2022).
doi: 10.1111/csp2.12686
Etter, A., rade, A., Nelson, C. R., Cortés, J. & Saavedra, K. Assessing restoration priorities for high-risk ecosystems: an application of the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems. Land Use Policy 99, 104874 (2020).
Valderrábano, M. et al. Using Ecosystem Risk Assessment Science in Ecosystem Restoration: A Guide to Applying the Red List of Ecosystems to Ecosystem Restoration (IUCN, 2021).
Cohen-Shacham, E. et al. Core principles for successfully implementing and upscaling nature-based solutions. Environ. Sci. Policy 98, 20–29 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.04.014
Bland, L. M. et al. Using multiple lines of evidence to assess the risk of ecosystem collapse. Proc. R. Soc. B https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0660 (2017).
Obura, D. et al. Vulnerability to collapse of coral reef ecosystems in the Western Indian Ocean. Nat. Sustain. 5, 104–113 (2022).
doi: 10.1038/s41893-021-00817-0
Burns, E. L. et al. Ecosystem assessment of mountain ash forest in the Central Highlands of Victoria, south-eastern Australia. Austral Ecol. 40, 386–399 (2015).
doi: 10.1111/aec.12200
Xiao, H. et al. Synergies and complementarities between ecosystem risk assessment and ecosystem accounting. Preprint at EcoEvoRxiv https://doi.org/10.32942/osf.io/y86ar (2022).
Mönkkönen, M. et al. More wood but less biodiversity in forests in Finland: a historical evaluation. Memo. Soc. Fauna Flora Fenn. 98, 1–11 (2022).
Kontula, T. & Raunio, A. Threatened Habitat Types in Finland 2018—Red List of Habitats Results and Basis for Assessment (Finnish Environment Institute and Ministry of the Environment, 2019).
Skowno, A. L. & Monyeki, M. S. South Africa’s Red List of Terrestrial Ecosystems (RLEs). Land 10, 1048 (2021).
doi: 10.3390/land10101048
Brownlie, S. et al. Biodiversity offsets in South Africa—challenges and potential solutions. Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais. 35, 248–256 (2017).
doi: 10.1080/14615517.2017.1322810
Tremarctos Colombia, Como Sistema de Alertas Tempranas 3.0 (UPME, 2015); http://www.tremarctoscolombia.org/
Norwegian Red List for Ecosystems and Habitat Types 2018 (Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre, 2018).
Skowno, A. L., Jewitt, D. & Slingsby, J. A. Rates and patterns of habitat loss across South Africa’s vegetation biomes. South Afr. J. Sci. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2021/8182 (2021).
Hoffmann et al. The impact of conservation on the status of the world’s vertebrates. Science 330, 1503–1509 (2010).
pubmed: 20978281
doi: 10.1126/science.1194442
Hoban, S. et al. Genetic diversity targets and indicators in the CBD post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework must be improved. Biol. Conserv. 248, 108654 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108654
Scherer, M. et al. Sand Dunes System of Southern South America—Assessment Report (IUCN, 2020).
Red List of Baltic Sea Underwater Biotopes, Habitats and Biotope Complexes Baltic Sea Environmental Proceedings No. 138 (Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission—HELCOM, 2013).
Ghana Spatial Biodiversity Assessment v.2 (National Biosafety Authority and the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research,2021).
Uganda Spatial Biodiversity Assessment v.1 (CONNECT Project, 2020).
Mapping Biodiversity Priorities: A Practical, Science-Based Approach to National Biodiversity Assessment and Prioritisation to Inform Strategy and Action Planning (UNEP-WCMC, 2016).
Wilkinson, M. D. et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 3, 160018 (2016).
pubmed: 26978244
pmcid: 4792175
doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
Obura, D. O. et al. Achieving a nature- and people-positive future. One Earth 6, 105–117 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2022.11.013
Díaz, S. et al. Set ambitious goals for biodiversity and sustainability. Science 370, 411–413 (2020).
pubmed: 33093100
doi: 10.1126/science.abe1530
Bachman, S. P. et al. Progress, challenges and opportunities for Red Listing. Biol. Conserv. 234, 45–55 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.03.002
Gallagher, R. V. et al. Global shortfalls in threat assessments for endemic flora by country. Plants People Planet 5, 885–898 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10369
Danovaro, R. et al. Ecological variables for developing a global deep-ocean monitoring and conservation strategy. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 181–192 (2020).
pubmed: 32015428
doi: 10.1038/s41559-019-1091-z
Seymour, C. L. et al. Horizon scanning for South African biodiversity: a need for social engagement as well as science. Ambio 49, 1211–1221 (2020).
pubmed: 31564051
doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01252-4
Han, X. et al. Monitoring national conservation progress with indicators derived from global and national datasets. Biol. Conserv. 213, 325–334 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.023
Son, H. H. A Welfare-Based Approach to Aggregating Growth Rates Across Countries https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1807453 (SSRN, 2011).
Payet, K. et al. The effect of land cover and ecosystem mapping on ecosystem risk assessment in the Little Karoo, South Africa. Conserv. Biol. 27, 531–541 (2013).
pubmed: 23692019
doi: 10.1111/cobi.12065
Sievers, M. et al. Indian Sundarbans mangrove forest considered endangered under Red List of Ecosystems, but there is cause for optimism. Biol. Conserv. 251, 108751 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108751
Pereira, H. M. et al. Essential biodiversity variables. Science 339, 277–278 (2013).
pubmed: 23329036
doi: 10.1126/science.1229931
Kim, H. et al. Essential biodiversity variables and essential ecosystem services variables for the implementation of biodiversity conservation and sustainable development goals. Preprint at EcoEvoRxiv https://doi.org/10.32942/X2130Z (2023).
Schrodt, F. et al. To advance sustainable stewardship, we must document not only biodiversity but geodiversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 16155–16158 (2019).
pubmed: 31409742
pmcid: 6697798
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1911799116
Bax, N. J. et al. Linking capacity development to GOOS monitoring networks to achieve sustained ocean observation. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00346 (2018).
Bland, L. M., Keith, D. A., Miller, R. M., Murray, N. J. & Rodríguez, J. P. Guidelines for the application of IUCN Red List of Ecosystems Categories and Criteria, version 1.1 (IUCN, 2017).
Murray, N. J., Keith, D. A., Simpson, D., Wilshire, J. H. & Lucas, R. M. Remap: an online remote sensing application for land cover classification and monitoring. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 2019–2027 (2018).
doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.13043
Lee, C. K., Keith, D. A., Nicholson, E. & Murray, N. J. Redlistr: tools for the IUCN Red Lists of ecosystems and threatened species in R. Ecography 42, 1050–1055 (2019).
doi: 10.1111/ecog.04143
Andersen, I. et al. Defining ‘science-based targets’. Nat. Sci. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa186 (2020).
Mair, L. et al. A metric for spatially explicit contributions to science-based species targets. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 836–844 (2021).
pubmed: 33833421
doi: 10.1038/s41559-021-01432-0
Ferrer-Paris, J. R. et al. An ecosystem risk assessment of temperate and tropical forests of the Americas with an outlook on future conservation strategies. Conserv. Lett. 12, e12623 (2019).
doi: 10.1111/conl.12623
Ghoraba, S. M. M., Halmy, M. W. A., Salem, B. B. & Badr, N. B. E. Assessing risk of collapse of Lake Burullus Ramsar site in Egypt using IUCN Red List of Ecosystems. Ecol. Indic. 104, 172–183 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.075
Lindgaard, A. & Henriksen, S. The 2011 Norwegian Red List for Ecosystems and Habitat Types (Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre, 2011).
Etter, A. et al. Colombian Ecosystems, Threats and Risks. An Application of the Red List of Ecosystems to the Continental Terrestrial Ecosystems (Pontificia Universidad Javeriana and Conservación Internacional-Colombia, 2020).