Instructional Video of a Standardized Interprofessional Postsimulation Facilitator-guided Debriefing of a Fatality in Plastic Surgery.


Journal

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open
ISSN: 2169-7574
Titre abrégé: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101622231

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 20 10 2023
accepted: 30 11 2023
medline: 9 2 2024
pubmed: 9 2 2024
entrez: 9 2 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Postsimulation facilitator-guided debriefing (PSFGD) is the process of intentional discussion of thoughts, actions, and events that took place during simulation amongst the facilitator(s) and trainees. Despite the significance of delivering high-quality debriefings, there is a lack of evidence-based guidelines. Our study aimed to provide an instructional video demonstration of a PSFGD of a fatality. Fifty surgical interns participated in a burn simulation scenario in two groups. Group 1 (control, or "no exposure," n = 25) consisted of residents who received oral postsimulation debriefing from an independent faculty member who had no exposure to our instructional video on how to debrief effectively. Group 2 (intervention, or "exposure," n = 25) consisted of interns who were debriefed by the second faculty member who did watch our instructional video before the simulation and learned about "advocacy and inquiry" techniques. The outcome measures were the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare score and the postdebrief multiple-choice question (MCQ) quiz scores to assess debriefers' performance and interns' knowledge consolidation, respectively. The "exposure" group presented statistically significantly higher values for the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare score ( Debriefers who followed the methodology as demonstrated in our instructional video were considered more competent, and the residents achieved higher MCQ scores. The quality of the debriefing ensures improved critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Safer practice and better patient outcomes are achieved by developing debriefing programs for educators.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Postsimulation facilitator-guided debriefing (PSFGD) is the process of intentional discussion of thoughts, actions, and events that took place during simulation amongst the facilitator(s) and trainees. Despite the significance of delivering high-quality debriefings, there is a lack of evidence-based guidelines. Our study aimed to provide an instructional video demonstration of a PSFGD of a fatality.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Fifty surgical interns participated in a burn simulation scenario in two groups. Group 1 (control, or "no exposure," n = 25) consisted of residents who received oral postsimulation debriefing from an independent faculty member who had no exposure to our instructional video on how to debrief effectively. Group 2 (intervention, or "exposure," n = 25) consisted of interns who were debriefed by the second faculty member who did watch our instructional video before the simulation and learned about "advocacy and inquiry" techniques. The outcome measures were the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare score and the postdebrief multiple-choice question (MCQ) quiz scores to assess debriefers' performance and interns' knowledge consolidation, respectively.
Results UNASSIGNED
The "exposure" group presented statistically significantly higher values for the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare score (
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
Debriefers who followed the methodology as demonstrated in our instructional video were considered more competent, and the residents achieved higher MCQ scores. The quality of the debriefing ensures improved critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Safer practice and better patient outcomes are achieved by developing debriefing programs for educators.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38333029
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005583
pmc: PMC10852376
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e5583

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.

Auteurs

Konstantinos Gasteratos (K)

Formerly of Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, N.Y.

James Michalopoulos (J)

Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, Greece.

Marven Nona (M)

Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada.

Antonios Morsi-Yeroyiannis (A)

Department of General Surgery, Hippokrateio General Hospital of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Jeremy Goverman (J)

Summer M. Redstone Burn Center, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass.

Hinne Rakhorst (H)

Department of Plastic Surgery, MST Enschede, ZGT Almelo, the Netherlands.

René R W J van der Hulst (RRWJ)

Department of Plastic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH