Comparison of ventriculoperitoneal shunt versus endoscopic third ventriculostomy in managing hydrocephalus due to tuberculous meningitis: a randomized controlled trial with a 30-day follow-up.

Background

Hydrocephalus is a significant complication arising from tuberculous meningitis (TBM). While ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) remains the primary surgical approach for TBM-related hydrocephalus, there is a rising trend in the use of endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV).

Materials and methods

This randomized controlled trial, conducted from February 2018 to July 2019, enroled 60 patients aged 20-50 with TBM-related hydrocephalus. Patients underwent either VPS or ETV. Both groups were followed up for a minimum of 30 days, evaluating clinical outcomes and modifications in the modified Vellore grading system. Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) assessments were conducted at 7-days and 30-day post-surgery for both groups.

Results

The mean GCS scores were comparable between the two groups on the 7th and 30th postoperative days. The association between modified Vellore Grade and treatment modality did not show statistically significant differences (

Conclusions

Both VPS and ETV demonstrate efficacy in managing hydrocephalus secondary to TBM in adult patients. Our 30-day outcomes did not reveal discernible differences between the two procedures. Therefore, considering technical expertise and experience with ETV, it may be considered as the primary choice for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion in TBM-associated hydrocephalus, owing to its avoidance of several lifelong complications linked with VPS.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

There are no conflicts of interest.Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.