Dentine Remineralisation Induced by "Bioactive" Materials through Mineral Deposition: An In Vitro Study.

Ca/P ratio EDS MTA SEM bioactive dental materials calcium silicate materials pulp capping vital pulp therapy

Journal

Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2079-4991
Titre abrégé: Nanomaterials (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101610216

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 18 12 2023
revised: 24 01 2024
accepted: 25 01 2024
medline: 9 2 2024
pubmed: 9 2 2024
entrez: 9 2 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This study aimed to assess the ability of modern resin-based "bioactive" materials (RBMs) to induce dentine remineralisation via mineral deposition and compare the results to those obtained with calcium silicate cements (CSMs). The following materials were employed for restoration of dentine cavities: CSMs: ProRoot MTA (Dentsply Sirona), MTA Angelus (Angelus), Biodentine (Septodont), and TheraCal LC (Bisco); RBMs: ACTIVA BioACTIVE Base/Liner (Pulpdent), ACTIVA Presto (Pulpdent), and Predicta Bioactive Bulk (Parkell). The evaluation of the mineral deposition was performed through scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) on the material and dentine surfaces, as well as at the dentine-material interface after immersion in simulated body fluid. Additionally, the Ca/P ratios were also calculated in all the tested groups. The specimens were analysed after setting (baseline) and at 24 h, 7, 14, and 28 days. ProRoot MTA, MTA Angelus, Biodentine, and TheraCal LC showed significant surface precipitation, which filled the gap between the material and the dentine. Conversely, the three RBMs showed only a slight ability to induce mineral precipitation, although none of them was able to remineralise the dentine-material interface. In conclusion, in terms of mineral precipitation, modern "bioactive" RBMs are not as effective as CSMs in inducing dentine remineralisation; these latter represent the only option to induce a possible reparative process at the dentin-material interface.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38334546
pii: nano14030274
doi: 10.3390/nano14030274
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Auteurs

Marta Kunert (M)

Department of General Dentistry, Medical University of Lodz, 251 Pomorska St., 92-213 Lodz, Poland.

Ireneusz Piwonski (I)

Department of Materials Technology and Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Lodz, 163 Pomorska St., 90-236 Lodz, Poland.

Louis Hardan (L)

Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Saint-Joseph University, Beirut 1107 2180, Lebanon.

Rim Bourgi (R)

Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Saint-Joseph University, Beirut 1107 2180, Lebanon.
Department of Biomaterials and Bioengineering, INSERM UMR_S 1121, University of Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France.

Salvatore Sauro (S)

Dental Biomaterials and Minimally Invasive Dentistry, Departamento de Odontología, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad CEU-Cardenal Herrera C/Del Pozo ss/n, Alfara del Patriarca, 46115 Valencia, Spain.
Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.

Francesco Inchingolo (F)

Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.

Monika Lukomska-Szymanska (M)

Department of General Dentistry, Medical University of Lodz, 251 Pomorska St., 92-213 Lodz, Poland.

Classifications MeSH