A 30-year bibliometric analysis of the literature in the disciplines of orthopedics, surgery, or oncology on chondrosarcoma from 1993 to 2023.
Journal
Medicine
ISSN: 1536-5964
Titre abrégé: Medicine (Baltimore)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985248R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Feb 2024
09 Feb 2024
Historique:
medline:
9
2
2024
pubmed:
9
2
2024
entrez:
9
2
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A thorough bibliometric analysis of publications published in the field of chondrosarcoma research has not yet been performed using the Web of Science database, especially for publications published between 1993 and 2023. This study, with a focus on the fields of orthopedics, surgery, and oncology, aims to fill this knowledge gap by providing a thorough analysis of current knowledge in the field of chondrosarcoma. In this bibliometric study, a literature search was performed using the Web of Science database to find all publications on chondrosarcoma. A bibliometric software program was used for data visualization and analysis (opensource visualization application, Vosviewer). The Web of Science Core Collection data used for this retrospective bibliometric study, which covers the period from January 1993 to September 2023, revealed interesting trends in chondrosarcoma research. As the most popular fields of study, orthopedics, surgery, and oncology account for a sizable portion of publications. A noteworthy increase in research output from 2014 to 2023, accounting for 41.74% of the papers, reflects the thriving research environment. The leading countries for publication were China, Japan, and the United States, demonstrating cross-border cooperation in chondrosarcoma research. Their contributions were highlighted by their important affiliations with institutions such as Harvard University, Leiden University, and China Medical University Taiwan. A thorough keyword mapping analysis also highlighted research priorities and encouraged interdisciplinary cooperation. The field's scholarly importance and ongoing relevance are highlighted by the study's high citation count (30,076) and highly cited articles. Overall, this study offers crucial insights into the development and collaborative nature of the chondrosarcoma research landscape and its long-lasting influence on academic research and clinical practice.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
A thorough bibliometric analysis of publications published in the field of chondrosarcoma research has not yet been performed using the Web of Science database, especially for publications published between 1993 and 2023. This study, with a focus on the fields of orthopedics, surgery, and oncology, aims to fill this knowledge gap by providing a thorough analysis of current knowledge in the field of chondrosarcoma.
METHODS
METHODS
In this bibliometric study, a literature search was performed using the Web of Science database to find all publications on chondrosarcoma. A bibliometric software program was used for data visualization and analysis (opensource visualization application, Vosviewer). The Web of Science Core Collection data used for this retrospective bibliometric study, which covers the period from January 1993 to September 2023, revealed interesting trends in chondrosarcoma research.
RESULTS
RESULTS
As the most popular fields of study, orthopedics, surgery, and oncology account for a sizable portion of publications. A noteworthy increase in research output from 2014 to 2023, accounting for 41.74% of the papers, reflects the thriving research environment. The leading countries for publication were China, Japan, and the United States, demonstrating cross-border cooperation in chondrosarcoma research. Their contributions were highlighted by their important affiliations with institutions such as Harvard University, Leiden University, and China Medical University Taiwan. A thorough keyword mapping analysis also highlighted research priorities and encouraged interdisciplinary cooperation. The field's scholarly importance and ongoing relevance are highlighted by the study's high citation count (30,076) and highly cited articles.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Overall, this study offers crucial insights into the development and collaborative nature of the chondrosarcoma research landscape and its long-lasting influence on academic research and clinical practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38335420
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037182
pii: 00005792-202402090-00049
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e37182Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.
Références
Chow WA. Chondrosarcoma: biology, genetics, and epigenetics. Res Faculty Rev. 2018;7:F1000–1826.
Hogendoorn PCW, Bovée JV, Nielsen GP: Chondrosarcoma (grades I–III), including primary and secondary variants and periosteal chondrosarcoma. In: Fletcher CD, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn PC, et al. (eds). World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone. 4th edn. Lyon: IARC Press. 2013:264–68.
van Oosterwijk JG, Anninga JK, Gelderblom H, et al. Update on targets and novel treatment options for high-grade osteosarcoma and chondrosarcoma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2013;27:1021–48.
Choi JH, Ro JY. The 2020 WHO classification of tumors of bone: an updated review. Adv Anat Pathol. 2021;28:119–38.
Weinschenk RC, Wang WL, Lewis VO. Chondrosarcoma. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021;29:553–62.
Chow WA. Update on chondrosarcomas. Curr Opin Oncol. 2007;19:371–6.
Jeong W, Kim HJ. Biomarkers of chondrosarcoma. J Clin Pathol. 2018;71:579–83.
Polychronidou G, Karavasilis V, Pollack SM, et al. Novel therapeutic approaches in chondrosarcoma. Future Oncol. 2017;13:637–48.
Şahin S, Alkan S. Contribution of Turkey in heart transplant research: a web of science database search. Exp Clin Transplant. 2023;21:150–7.
Wu J, Ji S, Niu P, et al. Knowledge mapping of syringomyelia from 2003 to 2022: a bibliometric analysis. J Clin Neurosci. 2023;110:63–70.
Şevik AE. Bibliometric and visual analysis of the literature on electroconvulsive therapy in psychiatry between 2000 to 2023. J Contemp Med. 2023;13:639–47.
Chen C, Song M. Visualizing a field of research: a methodology of systematic scientometric reviews. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0223994.
Üzümcügil AO, Alkan S, Kurt M. A bibliometric study on charcot foot deformity. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2023;15347346231179850.
Zhang J, Song L, Xu L, et al. Knowledge domain and emerging trends in ferroptosis research: a bibliometric and knowledge-map analysis. Front Oncol. 2021;11:686726.
Ekici A, Alkan S, Aydemir S, et al. Trends in Naegleria fowleri global research: a bibliometric analysis study. Acta Trop. 2022;234:106603.
van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010;84:523–38.
Baik HU, Seo BK, Kim GR, et al. A keyword analysis study on postpartum obesity using big data. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:8807.
Bahşi A, Tekin AM, Bahşi I. A bibliometric keyword and term analysis of the articles published in the journal of craniofacial surgery between 1995 and 2020. J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32:2263–5.
Erivan R, Dartus J, Villatte G, et al. Bibliometric analysis of case report citations and their effect on the impact factor: how does publishing case reports impact journals? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020;106:1463–7.
Altun SK, Barlik F, Aydemir ME, et al. A bibliometric analysis on Dicrocoelium dendriticum. Iran J Parasitol. 2023;18:193–201.